By Tan Jee Say

I wish to thank all my friends and netizens for your very kind words of support with regard to the misleading report in the Straits Times of 21 July 2012. Quite a few articles have been written following my initial FB posting on 13 August 2012, for example, 

The story behind Jee Say's exchange with Straits Times

Hatchet job on Tan Jee Say

Tan Jee Say should take The Straits Times to task and seek a full apology

Toh Yi residents:Straits Times also unfairly reported about us

 

I reproduce below one of them entitled "Hatchet job on Tan Jee Say" by 'Apolitical'.

Tan Jee Say, a losing contender for the position of President of Singapore against the ruling party’s preference for Tony Tan is obviously not on the Christmas list of the Prime Minister Office. 

Be that as it may, it is one thing to be selective in choosing one’s friends but quite another to demonise anyone it doesn’t like. It is not only unChristian but socially incompatible with gentlemanly conduct in daily life.

But then again in justification, the ruling party never claimed they are a gentlemanly lot what with their daily harangue against anyone with anything bad to say about them and the ‘founding father’s’ penchant for fixing the opposition and carrying axes in dark alleys. In his defence he claimed without the axe Singapore will be finished in four or five years. That explains why there are only two courses of action for him: try to live forever or train more axe carriers.

Straits Times wrote a piece that made Tan Jee Say looked bad because he had the misfortune of choosing a place of work which the tenant is in arrears of rental payment. Legally speaking it has nothing to do with him. He was an invitee to the premises to conduct his business whatever it may be as long as it is legal and in compliance with the law. Whether it is on an ex gratis basis, token payment or even full and proper market rate basis it matters not. Just because the tenant failed to pay his rent the owner of the premises has no right to drag his name in mud let alone any other third party be it Straits Times, our government or even the Pope.

If Straits Times and/or the government think/s Tan Jee Say is not in compliance with the law if he goes ahead to use the premises as planned then they should come right out and say so. In this instance it will be fair comments and proper news to be reported to a interested public. That it didn’t pursue this angle is not merely an act of hypocrisy but a calculated attempt to belittle and defame him.

The ruling party and its stakeholders display such ingenuity and long term vision when it comes to protecting their own tuff. If only they applied a fraction of the effort to promote the interest of Singapore, we would well have accomplished Swiss standard of living decades ago rather than banana republic polity that can hold its own against any Third World tinpot dictators.

This is a classic example of Straits Times being used by the government to push its agenda of demonising anyone with the courage to speak up against injustices and blatant wrong doings.

It could be the government didn’t actually ‘pull the trigger’ and Warren Fernandaz acted ‘instinctively’ as a person having lived under an oppressive society for so long he naturally knows which side his bread is buttered on. If so, PM Lee should openly declare the old days of curry favouring the incumbent for personal gains are gone. This one act alone will be the first genuine break from his father’s authoritarian modus operandi and set the tone for a true new beginning to right all that is wrong in Singapore (emphasis is mine, TJS).

Sometimes I really wonder about the intelligence of people in power. Even if they own the whole world they can’t live forever. They may succeed in punishing anyone that has differing views from them but they can never escape history judging them.

So what if you can bribe or threaten the inspector of your piling works thus allowing you to provide structural unsound foundation for a magnificent tall building that impresses at first sight. You can never bribe or threaten mother nature or its agent: time. Any structurally unsound building will not stand the test of time. The emperor with no clothes may learn a trick of two reading fairy tales and move ahead of the curve by frightening even little children and silencing them. But can they silence the wisdom of the crowd forever?

Abraham Lincoln said it best when he articulated these immortal words:“You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.”.

 

 

You May Also Like

许文远称公众搭公共交通需戴口罩

基础建设统筹部长兼交通部长许文远,今日(11日)在脸书发文,指出公众乘搭公共交通时都必须戴口罩。 他称,在落实“阻断措施”期间,地铁和巴士不再拥挤,公众能保持安全距离。不过若上述措施结束,等候公交的人潮重现,可想而知安全距离措施将迫使通勤者排队人龙。 “我可想象届时有许多不耐烦、愤怒的通勤者。我想较实际的折衷方法是所有通勤者都要戴口罩。” 他表示从现在起将要求通勤者戴口罩,也会透过交通大使、海报不断提醒。 另一方面,本地餐饮业所有负责售卖和准备餐点的员工,本月13日开始也必须戴口罩;明起(12日)要进入巴刹也要戴口罩。本地有40个实施人流控管措施的巴刹。

“Zahari 17 Years” continues to be banned in S’pore – BFC

BFC replies to Martyn See’s submission of six films for classification under the Films Act.

自由业者摄影师自揭影视圈内幕 被制作人拖欠薪酬长达四个月

一名初级摄影师Eskay Seah,在脸书上揭发他身为自由业者被欠款的可怕经历。日前他曾与名为Ignasia Incorporated Pte Ltd的制作人阿里(译名)合作,但他却未支付薪酬,结果当事人要追讨长达四个月。 事情由今年2月开始,当事人谢小姐(译名)获一名制片经理Noel(非真名)邀请,担任两周的电视剧制片助理。尽管她的职务是身为制片助理,领着较低的薪水(一天120新元而非150新元一天),但他必须身兼多职,无奈生活所迫使她接受薪水较低的工作。 文中她也表示一直都保持良好的心态,认为制片经理“为了制作更好的电视剧,或许会将钱投资在其他地方让本地广播节目得以扩展。“ 在拍摄期间,谢小姐被要求协助艺术部门和担任临时演员。此外,他也被要求拍摄幕后花絮,并在部分临时演员来到的半小时,以不支付任何赔偿下取消他们的演出(不支付任何赔偿),同时还要确保节目持续进行。据她的观察,这两项额外的工作要求都是因为人手不足造成。 她也表示,必须一个人管理逾16人的临时演员,面临巨大压力,阿里甚至开玩笑地威胁她,如果未能随传随到,及时集合这些临时演员,他不会支付谢小姐任何费用。 但是,当阿里再次表明仅支付谢小姐担任的女配角(先前为临时演员)3小时30新元的低薪酬,种种行为加上先前所受的委屈,让谢小姐极为愤怒。 她写道,阿里曾告诉他人,隔日只需要拍摄3小时,支付30新元即可,而再隔天则支付完整数额给谢小姐,确保她不会临阵逃脱,谢小姐知道后顿时火冒三丈。” “随后,我也向Noel要求,将我的薪资调整为一小时150新元,他也向我确保会考虑。随着他的要求,我将我的账单都转寄给他,以为这些荒唐事会在我的工作日最后一天,2019年2月15日结束。”她说。…