By Tan Jee Say

With global financial woes dominating the world’s headlines, it is easy to forget about the existence of ethical banks. They continue to thrive in their quiet understated ways, living out the moral principles and causes for which they are established.  Their principal motivation is not maximize profits or rake in huge bonuses, but to promote charity or a religious mission.

I had the opportunity of visiting one such bank last Thursday, the Kingdom Bank in Nottingham where Robin Hood and his Merry Men used to roam in nearby Sherwood Forest. What an ins0iration!

The bank’s chairman Adrian Lewis is an old college mate. It is a UK based independent Christian Bank, authorized and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. It has a history of over 50 years, providing funds to build and develop churches and Christian ministries within the UK. Adrian sees a great future for a small niche bank like Kingdom’s. Although traditional churches experience declining attendances, new churches are coming up fast with innovative ways of reaching out to the young and they have succeeded in building up even bigger congregations.

Their funding needs will increase and Kingdom Bank will grow with them. Adrian said it will remain strictly as a savings and loans bank with a religious mission and will not venture into esoteric banking products that have brought so much grief to the community. The world will be a much happier place if banks stick to their traditional role of channeling savings into development of real economic activities rather than into speculative investment products. (There is a similar lesson for us in investing Singapore’s surplus savings but we will address that issue in another forum at an appropriate time.)

As a momento of my visit, Adrian gave me a book that contained all references to money and possessions in the Bible.

The biblical reflections on prudent saving and investment surfaced again in the evening when I met another old friend Tim Tacchi for dinner. Tim is a global fund manager. I asked him for his views on what lay ahead for Europe’s financial problem. He said he would watch out for Europe’s “tail risks” which he referred to as events with low probability of happening but if they do occur, will have significant consequences.

If France succeeds in its “fiscal consolidation” and brings its deficit to within 3% of GDP, then it can tell Germany that it is an example of economic austerity for countries in southern Europe. But if Germany ends up bailing out everybody, then German bond yields will go up to where they were at the beginning of the crisis.

Then liquidity will be severely stretched. We would be in for a rough ride. And it all started with the big banks pushing aggressive loans and investment products to “unsuspecting” customers in southern Europe. If only they had stuck to the traditional savings and loans practices of ethical banks like thy Kingdom Bank.

 

You May Also Like

Dr Lee Weiling: AGC lodged a complaint of 500 pages to Law Society about Lee Hsien Yang’s wife over preparation of LKY’s will

Dr Lee Weiling shared that the Attorney-General’s Chambers has lodged a complaint…

Veteran architect Tay Kheng Soon slams poor design of pedestrian walkways in Singapore

Veteran architect and Adjunct Professor at the Department of Architect at the…

从行动党铁粉到人民之声 毕博渊道来从政路

新加坡人民之声党成员毕博渊(brad Bowyer),日前接受本社采访,谈及他早年如何参与行动党,而后为何又失望退出,走上截然不同的道路。 毕博渊在1985年来到新加坡,曾在英华初级学院(ACJC)就读。为了实现当特种部队的梦想,他曾返回英国受训,但很快就因为受伤而放弃这个念头。 他在1991年返回新加坡并在此定居。热爱演艺的毕博渊,在六岁开始就在舞台表演,此事他参与本地剧场,之后兴趣还延伸到动漫和艺术创作,以及电视制作。 他表示曾涉猎电影和电视制作、教学或担任顾问。甚至曾几次开办自己的影像制作业务。近期他涉足的特效公司至今都运转良好。可惜他因为健康原因而必须离开,专心养病。 为了早日康复,毕博渊去年一整年都在休假,不过自去年10月开始,他为投入政治工作做准备,积极在脸书发帖、做文章和研究社会政治课题等。 2011年后加入行动党 毕博渊虽然是林鼎创办的人民之声党成员,但是毕博渊最早踏足政治,却是从人民行动党开始的。 他解释,2011年大选后,发现社会存在许多问题,便和妻子讨论,希望可以做点什么。“当时想从内部着手,看看我能为改善事物做什么,这是我踏足政治的原因,也加入了行动党。” 毕博渊从志愿者做起,参与了许多借接见活动(MPS)。他负责聆听选民问题,依据与课题相关的部门起草公函,再交给议员过目。 之后,毕博渊在大选时被调到中区社区发展理事会。“我还被推举为支部候选人…当时我也参与协调全国对话会,在行动党总部和不同的公民群体讨论,整理他们的想法后提呈最终报告。” 当询及离开行动党的主要原因,毕博渊表示有两个。其一是新加坡成为跨太平洋伙伴(TPP),他认为此举形同“典当国家”;其二则是总统遴选制,哈莉玛还没当总统,国会中的议员就拿“总统女士”称呼来开玩笑。…

抨击现有公共组屋政策 半辈子供房  最后一无所有

针对近期总理李显龙在国庆群众大会上,宣称将确保提供国人可负担的公共组屋、医疗服务和教育,让国人无需担心。 不过,在总理宣布了数项新政策后,仍令一些网民感到失望。 网民Calvin Goh认为现有公共住宅政策根本就不是“可负担”,我们几乎花大半辈子,把大部分积蓄花在上面,但是到最后,缺什么也不能传承给下一代。 “当你买下组屋并偿还房贷好些年,房子应该属于你的。但在新加坡,到最后房子却不属于你的。你只是偿还房租和长期住在那间组屋。供了这么多年房贷,但最后好多人还是一无所有,什么也不能传承给子孙后代。” 他提问:究竟新加坡属于谁的?国人的存在,是否就只是为了还房贷和贡献给政府?我们究竟是为了谁打拼? 公共住宅理应负担得起 我指的是公共组屋,或者公共住宅。至于私有产业不管是永久屋契还是租赁权,都属私人“拥有”,开放给本地或外国人购买(设定一些条规限定只有国人能购买土地财产),又或者较少法规限制。 他认为,建屋发展局的公共住宅,理应让民众负担得起或真正拥屋。但实际上只要看看售屋合同,就很明白所谓屋主其实都只是租户。 公共住宅理应让人民有瓦遮头,不应让国人对房屋产权有其他的猜测。“我不认为用20-40年偿还公共组屋房贷是可负担的。真正的可负担,指的是国人只需要数年时间,即5至10年就可清还所有房贷。” 如此,在清还房贷之后,国人才有余钱储蓄,或追求其他梦想。 但是,在现有制度下,国人几乎大部分收入都花在房贷,可是一旦屋契到期,价值归零。形同公积金一样,所有的价值只能看,却用不了。…