~ By Ho Kwon Ping ~

The words “some day” resonate with many people of my generation. They were the final words of the refrain from the song “We Shall Overcome” which marked the civil rights movement of America in the 1960’s and ‘70s. As a wide-eyed freshman in the US, I attended student rallies and demonstrations, and I still recall the poignant, hopeful idealism of many young people, black and white, as they sang, arms linked and waiting for that “some day”.

For my parents’ generation, “some day” was a longing for a future when they would control their own destinies free from colonial masters; for freedom from poverty, hunger, illiteracy. The PAP when it came to power delivered on all its promises – and more – and “some day” became today.

Basic civil rights – equality of gender, race, and religion – became such a reality that for most of our younger generation, “some day” as an expression of hope, has little meaning since they have not had need to hope. Not having to yearn for a distant and perhaps unreachable future is a blessing our prosperity and security has given to younger people today.

But there is still a group of ordinary Singaporeans, of different races, religion, and gender, for whom “some day” remains elusive, distant, and yet fervently yearned for.

These are the people whose identities have become marginalized at worst and unclear at best, because of their sexual orientation. Once labelled pejoratively “homosexual”, then “gay”, and now for the politically correct — LGBT ( lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender ) – men and women who happen to love and desire others of their same gender, have yet to become just ordinary people in the eyes of society as they pursue their love lives. Worse, sex between males remains a criminal activity – though the government has declared that it will not enforce the law.

The rationale for not simply decriminalizing Section 377A is presumably the social conservatism of the very religious Singaporeans – whether Christian, Muslim, or Hindu. Whether there will indeed be a groundswell of anger if Section 377A is repealed or not, I do not know. We still do not have polls which can accurately survey public opinion. As to whether public opinion should even be the basis for discrimination against people is another matter altogether.

In some other societies, not being of the majority race or religion was reason enough to be an outcast – itself the start of the slippery slope to legal and institutionalised discrimination.

Thankfully, in Singapore we have embraced diversity as the foundation of our social cohesion, so it is unimaginable to us that people of a different race or religion can be legally discriminated against. How then do we justify the discrimination of people with a different sexual orientation?

I still recall when as a child, I was scolded and discriminated against in school because I was left-handed. My teacher thankfully, made a cursory attempt to make me right-handed, then gave up and accepted my deviancy. Today, being left-handed is so normal that no one even gives it a second thought.

The point is, as societies mature and progress, what was previously considered deviant behaviour generally becomes part of a larger “normal”. This is after all, the vision behind an inclusive society. Inclusive across different religions and races, and yes, even between people of different sexual orientation.

The Government has recently created the vision of an inclusive society as the basis of its programs. This is a very timely and relevant vision: during decades of impressive economic growth, segments of Singapore society have not enjoyed the fruits of development as others. But diversity and inclusiveness is not just about income levels.

Nor is it just about tolerance. Instead, it is recognising that not only should we be tolerant of those who are different from us, but indeed, that having a high level of diversity is a more positive assurance of creative continuation than unrelenting homogeneity.

It is about celebrating, as we do in the culture of Singapore Management University and Banyan Tree group, the very differences in our colleagues and stakeholders, which makes us stronger.

Long ago, my left-handedness made me a deviant in school. Today, our society accepts LGBT people as part of our social fabric. Perhaps gay love will even be decriminalised. Some day ….

Ho Kwon Ping is Executive Chairman of Banyan Tree Holdings, and  Chairman of Singapore Management University (SMU).  In 2011, he was voted Top Thinker in Singapore in the Yahoo! Singapore 9 Awards, a testament to his business innovations and leadership in civic causes. 

TOC thanks Pink Dot and Ho Kwon Ping for this article, which first appeared on Pink Dot’s website.

 

You May Also Like

CASE: 15 complaints against furniture company, Artmani Italia

The Consumers Association of Singapore (Case) said that it had received 15 complaints…

Police officer jumps into Rochor Canal to save drunk suspect

The Ministry of Home Affairs posted a video on their Facebook page…

Your candidate: Ang Yong Guan – Stepping out of the grassroots

[youtube id=”X14E8xJufb0″ align=”center” mode=”normal”] By Biddy Low Dr Ang Yong Guan is…

凯发集团申请展延还债期限至明年4月30日

面对财务问题的本地上市水务公司凯发集团(Hyflux),获高庭批准,展延原本下月18日到期的还债期限,至明年4月30日。 高庭批准凯发把还债期限再展延四个月。其代表律师称,将在未来一、两个月,同各债权人商谈债务重组安排。 目前凯发债务高达29亿5000万元,该公司今年5月向高庭申请法院监督程序,以重组债务和业务。 高庭当时也批准集团的六个月的债务延期偿付令(moratorium),以免集团被起诉、接管产业和清盘。这项禁令原本在12月18日到期。 凯发集团创办人林爱莲,曾是新加坡企业界红人,2001年凯发成为本地首个上市的水净化公司。集团多次获奖、市值一度高达21亿元,股价超过两元。林爱莲甚至有“水皇后”美誉。 然而,她在不适当时机进军能源领域,使集团陷入财困。公司股价暴跌39巴仙。受到新加坡近年电力批发价疲软的冲击,大泉水电厂持续亏损,导致集团一个季度就亏损超过2000万元。 印尼财团收购凯发60巴仙股权 在上月,凯发宣布和印度尼西亚财团SM Investment(SMI)签署合作协议,财团注资5亿3000万元,收购凯发的60巴仙股权。 SMI由印尼三林集团和Medco集团组成。但在面对媒体提问,外国集团持股六成,是否会稀释凯发作为新加坡品牌的代表性,林爱莲曾指出“所有资产还在新加坡,她也还在,凯发仍视新加坡公司。” 而三林集团董事经理林逢生(Anthony Salim)则指出凯发在净水、电力以及废料转化能源(waste-to-energy)方面都有经验,不少业务与三林集团重叠。…