~ By Bertha Henson ~

Another day of bad memories. I am referring to the case of the ex-SPH executive Peter Khoo, who was charged in court for filching money and receiving kickbacks from a supplier. I have been waiting for this day for close on two years now, ever since my ex-Editor called me into his room to tell me the news that Pete had confessed to what he did. He asked me to take on Pete’s job and clean house. I felt as though my head was about to burst; the blood was pounding in my skull so hard…I would never have thought Pete needed the money…

The day went by in a blur. Meetings with management to cobble out a press statement, a trip to the National Council of Social Service – then administrator of the School Pocket Money Fund (SPMF) to alert them to what’s happening, editorial meetings to decide how to ”play” the story. The ST editors decided that the story would be dealt with like any other story – even though/or especially since it involved one of our own. Stake-outs started. People who might have an inkling of what went on were pounced upon by their own colleagues.

But the impact fell hardest on the staff closest to Pete. Through the day, I had been busy contacting each one, telling those who were out of the office organising outside events to return, getting people on their rest day out of home to the office and telling one who was away on holiday to take the next plane home. Like now. Now.

When all went finally brought before the Editor to be told the news, they were shell-shocked. I thought to myself, “Oh my God, I am going to have a very hard time pulling them together to clean house,” I was wrong.

After a day of daze, they picked themselves up with a vengeance and we went about sorting through all the standard operating procedures and introducing new ones. I tied so much stuff in red tape that we were strangling ourselves with it.

The main thing was to ensure that DONATIONS would not have a way of slipping into somebody else’s pockets. Thinking back, some of the things we did were really over-the-top. Not enough to have one safe but two. Not enough to have one signature but two/three. There was the problem with cash donations. Cheques were pretty straightforward since they were in the name of the Fund, but all those coins and notes? 

Dealing with small change became a big chore. Bags and tags and counting once, twice, timings to get to the bank. It became so that I was tempted to say no cash please. It was just a small percentage of total donations but enough to be a big headache. Several times, staff came to me to ask that we convert the cash into a cheque. My chequebook would come out, and I would have several stacks of $2 bills that couldn’t fit into my handbag.

Of course, we didn’t clean house alone. Internal and external auditors were killing entire forests with reports on what was the case, now the case and would be the case. Those vouchers – and we had plenty – were a pain. New records were started, everything serialised, and procedures put in place for the drawing of any voucher. Essentially, staff had to record my permission for every single voucher drawn.

What was worse was that Pete had admitted taking Capita vouchers too. So there I was at one dinner with the Capitaland folks, a cheque in hand, to make restitution. I don’t when I have ever felt so shame-faced. But the Capitaland folks were gracious and more than willing to work with us again…I mean, they could have really made me feel worse.

I am not talking about the ins-and-outs of the kickbacks etc, since a court case is coming up. I know SPH has declined comment, but an assurance that things are in order is, well, in order. So dare I say this:  We cut off all links with Sino-British, the suppliers, as soon as we possibly could. The SPMF was ring-fenced even further. It is now a full-fledged charity, rather than the half-being it was. It is now properly staffed, with its own board and governance rules. There’s so much red tape on collection and distribution of money we could use them as Christmas decorations. At least, that was the way I left it.

Some people thought that we made too big a deal out of a small amount of money. I mean, $190K or so is nothing like City Harvest’s $23m…I don’t think so. When a publishing company gets into trouble, it has to come clean, be whiter than white.

After all, the media is the outfit that gets on its high horse whenever others commit breaches of trust. What more when it’s one of its own? Some self-flagellation is in order to restore the public trust. That’s part of maintaining editorial integrity as well.

Go buy ST.

This article first appeared on her blog. Bertha Henson is a former Associate Editor of The Straits Times.

 

You May Also Like

因路线意见不同 司机乘客争执不断

透过第三方进行召车服务,有时会遇到司机说要“要跟我的路”,而乘客说“我还钱要听我的”的情况,但是网民认为其实大家要多体谅和互相尊重,更不应该故意刁难司机,“他们的收入在这困难时期已经变的更少了”。 网民Kenneth Chan昨早(9月28日)在脸书上帖文,分享发生在德士上的司机和乘客之“公说公有理,婆说婆有理”事件。 Kenneth指出,乘客当时通过德士公司或第三方的召车程序召车,虽然车费便宜,但是必须根据GPS导航系统所制定的路线,非常复杂。 帖文中,网民分析道,类似情况对乘客来说较为有利,因为车票便宜,可以最大限度地“驱使”司机,路途长。但是对司机而言,却是花时间和汽车燃料的。“看看这乘客如何欺负德士司机……就因为是他付款……他其实可以不用这样要求的,可以很好的询问是否能够解决问题。” Kenneth Chan表示,他了解司机的状况,他若通过第三方应用程序或召车应用程序接受载客,就必须遵守导航上的中央高速公路(CTE)路线。但是,德士司机在接到这名乘客之前,似乎刚刚经过中央高速公路时看见该处塞车或交通拥挤,因此决定在接到乘客后,因意见不合而发生争执。 乘客要求使用中央高速公路,完全不考虑司机的意见,就算司机已经尝试解释说该处塞车。“很显然的,乘客并没有将司机的困难放在眼里,对司机而言,时间就是金钱,而塞车将导致司机付出沉重的代价。” “如果是现场召车或用德士计程表计费,或许乘客就会同意司机所建议的,没有堵车的路线了。这能造就双赢局面,乘客提早抵达目的地,而司机也能够有时间赚取更多收入。” 网民同时批评道,似乎很多本地人都有这种态度,都是‘我’、‘我’、‘我的’的心理。而且对于短片中乘客的“我付钱,我有权拒绝”一席话,他认为司机在面对如此无礼对待时,也有权利取消订单,拒绝任何付款方式并请乘客下车。 他希望司机能够获得和一般人同样的对待和尊敬,更何况若他一天下来都面对类似的刁难客,心情怎么不会差?“最重要的是,他们需要注意路况,还要面对其他的无礼驾驶者和乘客、长时间待在车龙中,尤其是人有三急的时候,这些种种都是为了应付房租和车油费,收入也因这困难时期而变得更少。” 他坦承难以责怪这些脾气暴躁的司机,因为他们都受困于这些烦躁的框架中。“他们之中,有些也是很友善的人士,甚至是很好的谈话对象。”…

单周病例达到最高点! 骨痛热症累积病例刷新2013年记录

国家环境局指出,本地骨痛热症病例在上周增加了872起,将我国今年截至上周的累计病例攀升到了9839起,刷出了自2013年以来,最高的同期纪录。 据国家环境局的数据显示,上周截止6月6日,本地骨痛热症病例增加了872起,并之前一周多出了140起,所累积的单周病例总数也于2013年和2014年蚊疫高峰期的病例总数相近。我国在2013年累积了2万2170起病例,单周最高病例数量达840起,当年也是我国骨痛热症疫情爆发最严重的一年。 截止6月8日,我国骨痛热症热点区达190个,其中西林道有105个、宏茂桥3道有78个以及裕廊路的65个热点已经在民众的努力下,被消除了。惟,兀里弄、淡滨尼7到、阿裕尼路、波东巴西1道及伊丽莎白通道一带的蚊疫情况严重。 当局也指出,他们发现在阻断措施实施期间,住家和走廊的黑斑蚊滋生地比前两个月增加了五倍,而在上述热点区内的蚊子滋生地中,八成以上是在住家发现,因此促请屋主和住户更加关注,努力积极灭蚊行动。

Face to Face forum: That elephant in the room

by Donaldson Tan So it turned out that the People’s Action Party…

民主党成功办选前集会 陈清木、林瑞莲录视频寄语

“信任,这是总理李显龙请大家做的:信任人民行动党。”新加坡民主党秘书长徐顺全揶揄,信任源于信守承诺,但如果不守承诺,那么信任就好比厕纸般,用过即弃。 民主党在上周六(19日)成功于芳林公园举办选前集会,吸引约两千人出席。 在集会上致词时,徐顺全在致词时批评行动党要求人民给予该党信任,但自身却未能信守承诺。例如在2015年大选时承诺要照顾年长者,然而越来越多年长者必须继续工作维生;至于消费税、水电费、停车费、学费等等百物价格调涨,加重人民负担。 “信任不是你说了什么,而是你做了什么”( Trust is not what you say but what you…