~ By Bertha Henson ~

Another day of bad memories. I am referring to the case of the ex-SPH executive Peter Khoo, who was charged in court for filching money and receiving kickbacks from a supplier. I have been waiting for this day for close on two years now, ever since my ex-Editor called me into his room to tell me the news that Pete had confessed to what he did. He asked me to take on Pete’s job and clean house. I felt as though my head was about to burst; the blood was pounding in my skull so hard…I would never have thought Pete needed the money…

The day went by in a blur. Meetings with management to cobble out a press statement, a trip to the National Council of Social Service – then administrator of the School Pocket Money Fund (SPMF) to alert them to what’s happening, editorial meetings to decide how to ”play” the story. The ST editors decided that the story would be dealt with like any other story – even though/or especially since it involved one of our own. Stake-outs started. People who might have an inkling of what went on were pounced upon by their own colleagues.

But the impact fell hardest on the staff closest to Pete. Through the day, I had been busy contacting each one, telling those who were out of the office organising outside events to return, getting people on their rest day out of home to the office and telling one who was away on holiday to take the next plane home. Like now. Now.

When all went finally brought before the Editor to be told the news, they were shell-shocked. I thought to myself, “Oh my God, I am going to have a very hard time pulling them together to clean house,” I was wrong.

After a day of daze, they picked themselves up with a vengeance and we went about sorting through all the standard operating procedures and introducing new ones. I tied so much stuff in red tape that we were strangling ourselves with it.

The main thing was to ensure that DONATIONS would not have a way of slipping into somebody else’s pockets. Thinking back, some of the things we did were really over-the-top. Not enough to have one safe but two. Not enough to have one signature but two/three. There was the problem with cash donations. Cheques were pretty straightforward since they were in the name of the Fund, but all those coins and notes? 

Dealing with small change became a big chore. Bags and tags and counting once, twice, timings to get to the bank. It became so that I was tempted to say no cash please. It was just a small percentage of total donations but enough to be a big headache. Several times, staff came to me to ask that we convert the cash into a cheque. My chequebook would come out, and I would have several stacks of $2 bills that couldn’t fit into my handbag.

Of course, we didn’t clean house alone. Internal and external auditors were killing entire forests with reports on what was the case, now the case and would be the case. Those vouchers – and we had plenty – were a pain. New records were started, everything serialised, and procedures put in place for the drawing of any voucher. Essentially, staff had to record my permission for every single voucher drawn.

What was worse was that Pete had admitted taking Capita vouchers too. So there I was at one dinner with the Capitaland folks, a cheque in hand, to make restitution. I don’t when I have ever felt so shame-faced. But the Capitaland folks were gracious and more than willing to work with us again…I mean, they could have really made me feel worse.

I am not talking about the ins-and-outs of the kickbacks etc, since a court case is coming up. I know SPH has declined comment, but an assurance that things are in order is, well, in order. So dare I say this:  We cut off all links with Sino-British, the suppliers, as soon as we possibly could. The SPMF was ring-fenced even further. It is now a full-fledged charity, rather than the half-being it was. It is now properly staffed, with its own board and governance rules. There’s so much red tape on collection and distribution of money we could use them as Christmas decorations. At least, that was the way I left it.

Some people thought that we made too big a deal out of a small amount of money. I mean, $190K or so is nothing like City Harvest’s $23m…I don’t think so. When a publishing company gets into trouble, it has to come clean, be whiter than white.

After all, the media is the outfit that gets on its high horse whenever others commit breaches of trust. What more when it’s one of its own? Some self-flagellation is in order to restore the public trust. That’s part of maintaining editorial integrity as well.

Go buy ST.

This article first appeared on her blog. Bertha Henson is a former Associate Editor of The Straits Times.

 

You May Also Like

为缓解人手短缺问题 政府放宽工作准证和S准证申请

据英语媒体《亚洲新闻台》报导,为了缓解各行业面临的人手短缺问题,政府将放宽所有领域的新工作准证和S准证申请。 据了解,人力部和卫生部、国家发展部及贸工部商讨,决定对上述准证的新申请程序进行调整。 报导也指建筑领域的雇主已面对工人短缺问题,该领域特别仰赖印度籍和孟加拉籍工友;至于饮食业也面临人手困难。 此前,人力部只处理冠病疫情低风险国家的准证新申请。其中包括中国。 不过,人力部称本地疫情趋向稳定,且具备“强大的公共卫生措施”和检测能力。为此,仍有空间“容纳”(accommodate)工作准证持有者,以缓解人手短缺问题。 为此,如今当局正处理所有受批准的来源国之准证申请,也允许一些国家或地区的工友,在本地特定领域工作。 不过,申请者和雇主仍需遵守现有入境管制措施,包括提前获得许可、出发前检测等,入境后也要遵守居家通知。

口罩政策U转 显现政府决策的缺陷

尽管新加坡政府在疫情爆发初阶,其检测被国际誉为“黄金标准”,但因对疫情采取“反应性”的预防措施而遭许多人抨击,包括较为争议的戴口罩立场。 在短时间内犹如经历“大风吹”转变,从建议身体不适才戴口罩,到不再劝导不戴口罩,最后强制戴口罩,甚至不惜对不带口罩者处以罚款的重罚。 总理李显龙于今年1月份时还向媒体透露,根据医生的建议,民众无需长时间戴口罩出门。 “这毫无帮助,事实上反而会出现适得其反的情况,因为他会制造毫无意义的安全感。你会认为你是安全,但其实你的手和口罩都是肮脏的,你会碰到口罩当摘下的时候,这也会促进感染。” 此番言论也获得主流媒体的支持,《海峡时报》于2月份时曾报道,卫生部医药服务总监麦锡威副教授,反驳新加坡四名医生的公开信。 四名医生呼吁公众应该出门戴口罩,减少感染风险,与此同时信内也呼吁公众应该勤于洗手和减少不必要社交。 医生也强调,戴口罩总比不戴口罩来得更好。当两人近距离接触时戴上口罩能够形成双向保护,避免将病毒传染到对方身上。 然而麦锡威则指出,在控制冠状病毒19时,“如今戴口罩并非是最重要的事情,反而是要留意经常接触的东西”,意味着戴口罩比保持良好的卫生习惯来得更不重要。 今年3月,国际两名医学专家认为戴口罩相当重要,有助于减低病毒传染,与世界卫生组织(WHO)的报告相违。 中国疾病预防控制中心主任高福接受《科学》杂志的采访时也透露,在疫情期间不戴上口罩,反而是错误的选择。 “病毒是通过飞沫和密切接触传染,因此飞沫是值得关注的,当你在说话时,飞沫会从嘴巴出来,所以必须戴上口罩。” “而且许多人是无症状感染,如果他们能够戴上口罩,就可以防止带有病毒的飞沫从嘴巴喷出,传染到别人身上。”…

IPS releases 2-yr-old survey results endorsing Minister Ong’s view 1 week after he said to bring in more FT

In an interview with Bloomberg on 19 Sep, Education Minister Ong Ye…

台湾赠口罩何晶“呃…”回应 台外交部:双边政策不受个人发言影响

日前,台湾政府宣布有意落实下一波口罩捐赠计划,将对有提出需求的新南向国家捐赠总计100万片的口罩,这些国家包括新加坡、马来西亚、菲律宾、越南、印度、缅甸、印尼等七国。 此前台湾已捐赠口罩给美国200万片、部分疫情严重欧洲国家700万片、友邦国家100万片等,支援这些国家的医护人员。 不过,我国总理夫人何晶昨日下午的一则贴文,却引起新加坡和台湾网民热议,事缘何晶在脸书分享有关台湾将捐赠口罩给新加坡的新闻报导,但贴文并未提及感谢、评论等,仅以“Errr…”带过。 相信连本地网民对于总理夫人兼淡马锡控股首席执行长的言论都感到“惊吓”,有者留言认为这种反应是否有欠妥当?即便“礼物不合心意”也至少出于礼貌表达谢意。 有者则揣测,有可能是基于早前有传言台湾在宣布禁止出口口罩时,新科工程设于台湾的两条生产线无法及时运返,直至二月初在移回我国;有者则酸台方只是在争取“政治分数”等。 不过根据台湾中央社报导,台湾外交部则回应,新加坡政府当时出于防疫需求,也因应台湾的口罩禁令,当时已将在台湾的两条生产线转移回新加坡。再者,生产口罩的机器设备并不在限制出口范围。 台湾外交部则强调,台湾和新加坡关系“长远深厚,不论政府或民间的关系都相当密切”,也指兩地政府也极为珍惜此特殊友谊,双边政策将持续以政府发言为主,不会受到任何个人发言影响。台湾外交部也呼吁珍惜新台两地得来不易的情谊。