~ By Cheong Yaoming ~

The NUSS organised a Post Hougang By-Election Dialogue yesterday with special speakers Mr Baey Yam Keng from the PAP and Mr Low Thia Khiang from WP.

The following is the transcript of Mr Low's speech during that event:

Photo by Desmond Wee, The Straits Times

Good Evening, Ladies and Gentlemen,

Hougang SMC is a unique constituency in Singapore and is known beyond Singapore. It is unique because it represents the political conscience of Singapore!

By following their political conscience, the Hougang voters humbled both the PAP and the WP! To the PAP, their message is loud and clear – they want justice and fairness and will not bow down to bullying tactics.

The Hougang voters have also sent a message to WP that we have to do our best to live up to our promises, to serve the people and not be afraid to admit our shortcomings and mistakes, even if it embarrasses us.

The Hougang residents, in that sense, keep both the PAP and WP in check!

Voting for Workers’ Party was not an easy decision for Hougang voters. They have made huge personal sacrifices for more than 20 years in voting for the Workers’ Party. The PAP government punishes them by withholding infrastructure development and improvement to the estate.

The Main Upgrading Program and Interim Upgrading Program were not extended to Hougang. As for the Lift Upgrading Program (LUP), Hougang was thrown to the end of the queue. As of today, LUP work has not even started for about 80% or more of the HDB flats in Hougang.

The PAP leaders even tell Hougang voters during elections that the value of their HDB flats will fall behind other PAP constituencies if they voted for Workers’ Party and threatened them that Hougang would become a slum one day.

This is the reality of the PAP government. Where is the First World standard they claimed to be building? We have pledged ourselves to build a democratic society based on justice and equality. Where is the justice and equality for Hougang and how successful are we in our nation building process? I leave it to you to judge.

Hougang does not have complete covered walkways to link all the blocks in a precinct, a common facility in PAP wards. The Hougang residents are still waiting for the Lift Upgrading Program although many of them are aging as in other constituencies. Yet despite the generous offer of 100 million to upgrade Hougang estate to entice voters to vote for the PAP candidate during election, they decided to follow their conscience and not give in to the bullying and unjust tactics of the PAP.

In the recent By-election, there were some hiccups in the Workers’ Party. These were reported prominently by all media and could have shaken the faith of Hougang voters in Workers’ Party.

However, the By-election results show that the voters of Hougang are sharp to discern the truth and make their own independent judgment. I salute the voters of Hougang.

They understand that it is not easy to become a truly First World country with a First World parliament although a step has been taken at the last General Election in 2011 with the support of Aljunied GRC voters and Singaporeans in general.

They also understand that under our political system and our political climate where the ruling party, PAP, has been the government for nearly 50 years, it is not easy to build up an opposition political party, an organization with discipline and integrity and not just a grouping of like-minded individuals.

They appreciate the importance of a more balanced political system where the people are able to keep the government on its toes and hold it to account so that it will be more responsive to the needs and aspiration of Singaporeans. They believe that people, being the masters of the nation, must preserve the fundamental mechanism to enable them to exercise their power through the ballot box.

The political awakening and experience of Hougang voters in the last 20 years with the Workers’ Party has enabled them to closely monitor the development of opposition politics in Singapore and share the aspiration and vision of WP.

There are some who believe that the result of the Hougang By-Election is a personal result of Low Thia Khiang who had been there for 20 years, implying that it would have been a different story if Low Thia Khiang were no longer in politics.

People who hold this view fail to understand the people of Hougang. While it is true that I know a lot of people in Hougang over the years and have even become good friends with some, the majority of Hougang voters demand a standard of service and conduct from their MP that is worthy of their support.

It is based on this understanding that the Workers’ Party decided to expel Yaw Shin Leong and to let the voters in Hougang to decide again if they would give WP a fresh mandate to represent them in Parliament. This was a difficult decision with high political risk but we owe it to the Hougang voters.

The voters in Hougang had supported the Workers’ Party and me as their MP for 20 years; they have also supported the WP candidate in GE 2011 when I moved out to contest in Aljunied GRC. The candidate for Hougang who was then elected as MP failed to live up to the expectations of both Hougang voters and WP. If Workers’ Party had failed to do what was right, we would have shortchanged the Hougang voters and betrayed their trust.

People in Hougang are People with 义气. This is the essence of the Hougang Spirit. I do not know how to accurately translate this into English; it is more than just personal loyalty or sense of brotherhood. The Chinese meaning of 义 encompasses the meaning of justice, fairness and morality. I believe that so long as Workers’ Party keep faith with the voters of Hougang, they will continue to support the Workers’ Party candidate in future elections.

Thank you.

Mr Low Thia Khiang's speech first appeared on the Workers' Party website.

You May Also Like

Balakrishnan issues statement on Vincent Wijeysingha video

Andrew Loh People’s Action Party (PAP) candidate for Holland-Bukit Timah Group Representation…

政府对非主流媒体处处提防,是天生的恐惧?

两周前,《雅虎新闻》记者Nicholas Yong上载了一篇文章,揭露非主流媒体在采访工作上和政府打交道时,往往会面对各种困难,例如无法第一时间获得重要官方通知、未获通知和邀请出席政府部门的记者会或重要活动。 他诉苦道,主流媒体新闻出街几小时后后,他们才收到官方文告;重要的官方活动亦会以“仅限本地媒体”为由,限制非主流媒体出席。 Nicholas 写道,“还有一次,我们向政府要求预先提供国庆日当天的演说稿–这可是一整年里面最重要的政治演说,但我们却被各个资深官员以“我手头上没有”而拒绝提供。相反地,主流媒体一天前就拿到讲稿了。” 主流与非主流媒体的差别待遇已不是新鲜事,Nicholas也曾提及,前两年的国会新闻采访上,非主流媒体被迫挤在狭窄的国会新闻发布室上,室内禁止携带手机,而且无法第一时间获得演讲稿。反观新加坡报业控股与新传媒记者,却可以获得国会实况。 “今时今日,为什么仍给予主流媒体抢占先机,难道是为了主导论述吗?”他质问。 同样地,本社对于这种厚此薄彼的偏驳,也感同身受。有准证的非主流媒体不会收到政府文告,而且有时这些完整文告也不会上载到政府部门官网,但主流媒体却可以率先报导出街。 举个例子:学术界联署反对《防假消息法》,但是教育部的回应声明,并没有第一时间上载到官方网站上,反而独家给了《海峡时报》。即便到今天,这则教育部声明也没办法在该部官网找到。 然而,有别于《雅虎新闻》获得媒体认证,本社则是注册在新闻与艺术部下的其中一家受监督媒体机构。 本社也曾在去年申请媒体认证,然而却被告知本社不需要取得认证即可报导本地新闻,而要不要发出认证,也取决于政府的斟酌: 如同Nicholas所提,政府真的对主流与非主流媒体有差别待遇,不论对已注册在新闻及艺术部下的媒体如《雅虎新闻》或本社,都有限制?…

狮城教授禁课堂带入政治理念 港城大学生会致函校长抗议

香港反送中热潮持续至今已五个月,如今反送中运动抗争燃烧到学校。香港城市大学上周爆出一名狮城教授为了不让学生在课堂上宣扬政治议题,因此发电邮告知学生若涉及宣扬政治理念,就给予全组同学零分。 据报道,该名教授为新加坡籍陈勇锦,目前任教于香港城市大学市场学系助理教授。 香港《苹果日报》接获读者报料,指该名教授于电邮中指出,在未来的课堂上,如若有任何同学欲讨论政治议题,或以简报作为宣扬政治理念,将予以全组同学零分。 最后,陈勇锦在电邮中直指,“我们是来学习的,请不要把你的政治理念带进教室里。”(We are here to learn. Do not bring your…

South Korean woman tests positive for coronavirus after traveling in Thailand

South Korea confirmed its 16th case of coronavirus, as a 42-year-old South…