By Raymond Anthony Fernando

Workers Party Member of Parliament, Gerald Giam made a very valid point during the party’s election rally when he mentioned that Medishield had collected 130 million in premiums, but the payouts were so little. I fully agree with Mr Giam’s observation.

I have been paying medishield premiums for both myself and my wife since its inception, but we find it so difficult to make a claim. Recently, I went for a colonoscopy at Tan Tock Seng Hospital and was charged $484.50, but was told that I cannot claim a single cent from medishield because the scheme is only for operations and bigger bills. This scheme needs to be reviewed so that more of our older citizens can benefit from the paying insurance at an affordable cost.

There have been other instances where both my wife and I could not make similar claims. What is the point of paying premiums year in and year out when no claims can be made? There must also be greater transparency on medishield premiums paid through the annual CPF statements so that account holders are aware of how much they have paid. This has never been done. Why is this so?

For senior citizens, the rising medical costs are indeed worrisome and the government needs to provide more support for this group who have contributed to the economy in the past.

There are no subsidies given on non-standard drugs for some medications such as Glucobay, which can cost as much as $78 for 3 months supply. A bottle of 200ML Lactus purchased at the polyclinic cost $1.40 while the same amount purchased at Tan Tock Seng cost $3.50. So why the big difference? Blood tests for patients suffering from diabetes at polyclinics have shot up from $12 to $13.50, and nobody notices it until they scrutinise the bill.

Psychiatric patients cannot buy health insurance for their physical illnesses because no insurance company wants to cover them even for non-psychiatric illnesses. Is this what an inclusive society is all about?

 

You May Also Like

Teachers of West Spring Primary School banned to work outside working hours to have work-life balance

West Spring Primary School has made exceptional rules to ensure its staff’s happiness…

牵导盲犬竟被店员赶出去 Subway致歉允诺一同提升意识

女子牵着导盲犬,进入三文治连锁店Subway,店员却称Subway是清真店(Halal),不允许导盲犬进入,女子也声称被店员怒喝。 网友Sophie Soon昨日(13日)在脸书上发文控诉,位于加隆威商场(Kallang Wave Mall)内的Subway不允许她携带导盲犬进入,她也因此与店员起争执。 这名网友声称,当时店员不仅拒绝她进入店内,也拒绝随同的朋友进入店内。女子欲与他沟通时,还对着她大吼大叫,不让两人进行沟通。 “他不仅拒绝我进入,也拒绝和我交流,我尝试和他交流可是他却对我大吼大叫,不仅如此,也拒绝我朋友进入。” 据Sophie指出,店员坚称Subway是一家清真店,因此即使是导盲犬也不允许进入,还搬出新加坡回教理事会,称他们也不支持导盲犬进入清真店内。 新加坡回教理事会于2010年曾发表文告,为方便更多残障人士,允许导盲犬进入清真店内,为障友制造更友善的环境。 Sophie在文末也指出,上述的行为如同“未被教育”,也呼吁网友能够分享此事,提高人民的意识。 帖文发出后引发网友的关注,截至目前已经获得了320次转载。 根据Sophie最新帖文指出,Subway也和她取得联系,除了致歉以外,Subway也邀请Sophie一同提高民众对于导盲犬的意识,并且承诺会对爆粗员工采取行动,和教育员工相关知识。…

Minister's Facebook post comes under fire

Controversial posting by Minister Khaw Boon Wan on joint-exercise A Facebook posting…

SNEF President says work pass scheme provides foreign talents for SGs to spar with

In an interview last week, Singapore National Employers Federation (SNEF) president Robert…