This email was sent to TOC and other media outlets by a group of SMRT bus drivers who requested that they be allowed to remain anonymous.

With regards to the various reports by the local newspapers, a group of bus drivers from SMRT Bus Service would like to point out that in actual fact, there is no salary increase for a large group of bus drivers.

The salary adjustment given by SMRT Bus Service is different from that given by SBS Transit. In the case of SBS Transit, they have really given a monetary addition to the salary of all its bus drivers without any withdrawal of variable allowances/incentives or working duration.

However, this is not the case with SMRT Bus Service.
 
Main Change by SMRT Bus Service:
 
For a Singaporean bus driver, the salary adjustment is $225 per month.
For a SPR/Malaysian bus driver, the salary adjustment is $100 per month.
However a crucial point to note is that all bus drivers now have to work a 6-days week instead of a 5-days week.
 
The folllowing 5 reasons will highlight how SMRT Bus Service has misrepresented the salary adjustment and in actual fact a large majority of the bus drivers who have been employed for a long time with SMRT Bus Service will lose out:
 
1. With the salary adjustment, all bus drivers are required to work 6 days instead of 5 days. In 2005, we were all on a 6 days work week. Citing work-life balance, SMRT Bus Service changed it to 5 days. Now, they are changing it back to a 6 days work week. By cutting down on our rest days, we will spend more days driving which will make us more tired. This can result in more accidents and increased MCs.
 
2. The change from a 5 days work week to a 6 days work week will result in a pay loss for bus drivers who have a gross monthly salary of about $1150 and above.
 
The formula for calculating the daily gross renumeration of a bus driver is (12 months x gross salary) divided by (52 weeks x No. of days worked in a week).
 
The following scenarios will show how bus drivers earning above $1100 will lose out in terms of monetary gains:
 
Scenario A:
For a Singaporean Bus Driver previously earning $1100, the daily gross renumeration for a 5 day week is $50.769. After the salary adjustment of $225, the daily gross renumeration for a 6 day week is $50.961 (increase)
 
Scenario B: For a Singaporean Bus Driver previously earning $1300, the daily gross renumeration for a 5 day week is $60.00. After the salary adjustment of $225 the daily gross renumeration for a 6 day week is $58.654 (decrease)
 
Scenario C: For a Singaporean Bus Driver previously earning $1500, the daily gross renumeration for a 5 day week is $69.231. After the salary adjustment of $225, the daily gross renumeration for a 6 day week is $66.346 (decrease)
 
As you can see from above scenarios, only Scenario A will result in a gain in gross salary for a Singaporean bus driver.
 
The daily difference may seem negligible however, when taken as a whole on an annual basis, this results in a substantial reduction in annual renumeration for the bus drivers who are already trying hard to make ends meet to support their families.
 
3. Based on the examples shown in the above point, the salary adjustment will also result in a lower annual renumeration for bus drivers earning more than $1150, those who work on their rest day/ public holiday and the encashment of annual leave. Having the policy changed by SMRT Bus Service from a 5 days work week to a 6 days work week will result in bus drivers having less time for their families, which is contrary to the Singapore government's policy of work-life balance. Bus drivers will only have 1 rest day a week and have to apply leave should they wish to spend more time with their family. Currently, on a 5 days work week, it is already very hard for us to apply leave as there is a quota set for each service route. With only one rest day now, it will only make matters worst. How does SMRT Bus Service expect to recruit more locals with 6 days work week?
 
4. Another point that was not reported is that SMRT Bus Service has also grouped the Singapore Permanent Residents (SPR) and Malayians in the same category, and are giving a salary adjustment of only $100 to SPR and Malayian bus drivers. This decision has left many SMRT Bus Service bus drivers holding SPR status wondering why this is so when no Foreign Worker Levy is needed to be paid by SMRT Bus Service for the SPRs unlike non-SPR bus drivers.
 
5. Lastly, the reports by the local newspapers also left out the fact that SMRT Bus Service had factored in the salary increment into the salary adjustment ($225 for Singaporean bus drivers and $100 for the SPR and Malayian bus drivers). That is to say, the salary adjustment is even less than reported. With this year's inflation forcasted at 5.2%, NTUC has called companies to give employees a pay rise to beat inflation. Taking an average of $1300, a 5.2% increment for us is around $80. We need to therefore deduct $80 from the $225/$100 to reflect our actual salary adjustment.
 
We hope that the correct facts can be made public and that our union did not help us. This has led to much confusion and unhappiness among fellow colleagues and members of the public.
 
This article is published by The Online Citizen, 20 Maxwell Road, #09-17 Maxwell House, Singapore 069113.
You May Also Like

ELD: Uneven voter turnout, COVID-19 safety measures, limited resources at large polling stations resulted in “long queues” during GE2020

The “abnormally long queues” that voters experienced during the recent General Election…

Pawn shop loans increase 81%

By Leong Sze Hian – Record pawn shop loans According to the…

“动用“泼马”不能否定问题” 民主党向人力部申请撤更正指示

据了解,新加坡民主党已在上周五正式向人力部提出申请,要求撤回后者援引《防假消息法》,向该党三则网络贴文发出的更正指示。 上周四(2日),民主党要求人力部长杨莉明撤回更正指示,并作出公开道歉,也坚称该党的相关声明乃是事实。 不过人力部在隔日表示,仍未接到民主党提出的要求撤回指示的申请,并要求该党依循《防假消息法》下的程序提出申请。 对此民主党则在上周五2时50分,向上述部门提出有关申请。 在《防假消息法》下,若相关人士不满部长的更正指示,可向相关发出指示的部长提出上诉。包括可在www.pofmaoffice.gov.sg,填写表格,挑战相关部长/下指示机构的指示。 而在周六发布的贴文,民主党继续针对就业课题穷追猛打,指国人这些年经历行动党政府引进外籍员工政策,特别是PMET(专业人士、经理、执行员和技师),对问题感同身受。 该党强调,即便人力部动用“泼马”法也不能否认问题的存在,“以泼马对付民主党,显示人力部试图把人民的愤怒转移开来,或扼杀政策的辩论。” 时事网申请撤销指示被驳回 另一方面,内政部长兼律政部长尚穆根,已在本月3日驳回时事网States Times Review主编陈智祥,要求撤销假信息更正指示的申请。 去年11月28日,内政部祭出防假消息法,要求来自澳洲的脸书专页State…

清寒子弟欠费领不到成绩单正本 教育部澄清吁家长正视义务

此前,社运份子吴家和在脸书分享,有清寒子弟因家里经济状况因素,学校费用未缴清,致使他们只能领取小六会考(PSLE)成绩单的影印本,幸得善心人士解围,才顺利获得成绩单正本。 对此,教育部透过媒体澄清,有关学生仍能继续申请中学入学,不过也证实,若学费未缴清,有关学生只能拿到影印本而不是成绩单正本,且这是该部“一贯的政策。” 该部表示,此事无关乎“回收款项”,并解释考量到教育费大部分都是公共拨款,那么基于一项原则,大家仍能共同承担和正视义务,不管这些费用多小。该部希望家长们一同来强化此举带出的意义。 教育部续而解释,有关家长近两年未缴付杂费,也没有提出任何经济援助申请。 教育部又补充,每年为每位小学生补助约1万2000新元,分担下每个学生每月仅付13元杂费。该部强调低收入家庭可以申请财务援助,来减轻制服、课本、交通、学校伙食和学杂费等负担。 “贴文旨在质问教育部的价值” 事实上,在吴家和的贴文,也提出教育部已竭尽所能提供所有学生帮助,但仍会有需要帮助的“落单”群体。 但教育部指出,经济状况不应成为孩子成长的绊脚石,而教育机构的首要任务是确保学生成长和发挥潜能。 该部认为吴家和的贴文旨在“质问教育部的意图和价值”,也反问教育者、家长和群众,来决定教育部的决策是否公平和具有教育意义。 一些网民在《亚洲新闻台》的脸书留言,教育部奉行上述政策许久,有者现身说法,指孩子小六会考时自己正好有些财务拮据;孩子领到成绩单影印本,不过老师并没有大事宣扬。最后自己向校方申请财务援助。 但也有网民要求大家停止责怪有关清寒家庭的家长,“你们对他们的处境有深入了解吗?他们很可能正是落单的群体?又或者他们完全不知道有辅助计划可申请?或者是年长者或教育水平低?也不知道面对这些情况该怎么做?”他认为真正的受害者是学生。 网民Low…