~ By Ng Yi Shu ~

21st May 2012 marked the 25th anniversary of Operation Spectrum, where an alleged Marxist plot sent waves of shock and awe through the Singaporean socio-political scene. This scene has developed and gone a long way since then, but we are still trapped within the dictated OB markers set up by the government through various litigation threats and ISA arrests. Being born after 1987, I did not experience as much fear as the older generations did at that time. Still, I was given the ‘say anything wrong, police catch you’ mentality – which stuck even as I became an intern at TOC. I remember my parents reiterating that I should not say or write any allegation without absolute proof that it was true. Sure, there was definitely wisdom in that belief, but it was rather clear that it stemmed from a simple fear – that of arrest and the ISA.

Even then, it has been 25 years since Operation Spectrum.

It has been 25 years.

We all know it – that things have changed since. Your ability to read this article today on this socio-political blog – which survived a gazette to become a political organization and litigation threats (remember Vikram Nair?) – is proof that change has occurred. We do not deny it too – headlines often talk about a new political climate; a new future. Opposition parties talk about hope of diversity in representation. Changes in legislation increased freedom of media – freedom in political film and in social media campaigning catalysed the General Elections of 2011 and continues today with the Hougang by-election. We have witnessed the change hailed as a new political era.

We have come to a point where oppression will only result in revolution; where citizens have become more critical; where censorship and cover-ups will only lead to the ugly revelation of the truth. We desire dignity, opportunity and justice and there is nothing the ISA can do to stop us.

So what is?

I’d suggest that there is nothing to stop us to act – and we are already acting. The sheer number of voices we hear on the Internet is proof that we enjoy a larger degree of freedom of speech than before. Interest groups are springing up to protect people’s rights and the rights of the voiceless. Civil society is growing, however small it may seem.

Thus today, people have begun to act.

Yes, the ISA has been a constant bind on our freedom of speech. Yes, the ISA has provided grounds for political activists to be arrested. Yes, the ISA must be removed. Even then, people have begun to set themselves free from the out-of-bounds markers that caged our political conversation. Alternative media and social media have allowed for increased political awareness and activism and this in turn has allowed Singaporeans to begin to grow civil and civic society.

Therefore, are we truly free? I genuinely believe so.

With this freedom, however, comes responsibility. Not that we should not bar ourselves from saying some things (especially some things about the ruling government), but that we must be responsible as Singaporeans in working for our vision for our nation – to bring hope, dignity, justice and equality for future generations.

You May Also Like

女企业家吁政府介入 避免业主持续调涨租金

餐饮公司JC Global Concepts总监刘婉贞最近在脸书上帖文,强调政府应该介入地产业,避免业主每次乘续租时起租户租金。 《商业时报》在5月27日刊载一则题为《新加坡商联敦促私人产业主落实公平租赁条款》的报导。文章提及新加坡工商联合总会(SBF)有意敦促私人业主,遵循公平租赁协议(Fair Tenancy Agreement)的原则,包括更透明化的租赁成本和管理租户分享的数据。 不公平租约加剧商家负担 文章强调工商总会目前正重检有关的租赁协议,并让业主遵循和采用该框架。但是如果他们采取的方式皆宣告失败,工商总会可能推动立法执行。 此外,租户也必须参与业主的销售点系统,使业主可得知租户的营业情况 文章还强调,由于受政府减少对外国员工依赖政策的影响,已陷入困境的餐饮业者,现在又面对更有利于业主的“新加坡不公平租约”,致使业者的情况雪上加霜。 业主不愿为旧租户减租金 文中也提到一些包括短期租约的问题,这些租赁协议都让业主受益,甚至在个人保证条款还注明,“若租户停业,租户有责任支付剩余期限的租金”。…

AWARE: Rethinking fundamental approaches to budget making

This is AWARE’s official press release for its recommendations regarding the upcoming…

Singapore’s economy shrinks by 5.8% in 2020 despite seeing improvement in industries in Q4

Singapore’s economy contracted by 5.8 per cent in a pandemic-hit 2020, according…

How about a Yellow Noose Project?

– By Gangasudhan – We have heard so much about the Yellow…