~By Foo Jun Kai ~

As a 20 year old Hougang resident who cannot exercise his right to vote in the upcoming by-election (due to the voting age in Singapore not being in line with many developed countries as the government knows that allowing those between the age of 18-21 to vote is not advantageous to them), I thought the least I can do is to pen my thoughts.

Please help to share this if you know of Hougang voters in your friends list. One criticism of Singaporeans is that we whine so much about the government but ironically, we are the creators of our own unhappiness as we are the one who voted for the government we have. Well, at least 60.4% of us, but Hougang residents have been bucking this trend for the past 20 years. 

The government has tried to frame this by-election as a 'local' election rather than a 'national' election. Residents in Opposition wards have been discriminated over the years. The PAP government has politicised supposedly 'neutral' organisations such as the PA and HDB. For those who don't know, losing PAP candidates stay on in Opposition wards as grassroots advisers. 

Instead of our elected Opposition MPs, the grassroots advisers are the ones who announce lift upgrading in Opposition wards. 

When a Hougang resident contacted HDB to repair a leaking toilet pipe, he was told to get the PAP grassroots adviser to request for a subsidy from HDB. 

When Opposition MPs want to organise events in their own constituency, they have to get approval from the PA if the piece of land belongs to the PA. 

When residents organise events and wish to invite their MPs, they are told they have to invite the grassroots advisers instead. 

As we all know, Opposition wards are placed at the back of the queue for upgrading programmes even though the funds come from all taxpayers. In 2011, PM Lee justified that "there has to be a distinction because the PAP wards supported the Government and the policies which delivered these good things." So how can elections be solely 'local' and not 'national'? 

In 2012, PM Lee justified that it is his discretion whether or not to call for a by-election because in our Westminster system of parliamentary government, voters not only choose candidates but also the party to form the government. So how can elections by solely 'local' and not 'national'? 

Going by this line of thinking, voting for an MP is also a referendum on the government policies and views, which include issues such as the ISA, Lim Chong Yah's wage proposal, and the need to continuously expand our population. These are issues the ruling party has refused to budge on. 

We, the citizens of Hougang SMC, pay the same taxes and suffer the same two year delay (NS) in our education, career, life, and future as any other citizens in other constituencies. 

DPM Tharman has said that the WP takes elections lightly. Now, who is the one who takes elections lightly? We have been disrespected by the ruling party who put in their own grassroots advisers instead of OUR OWN ELECTED MPs.

To voters of Hougang SMC, if you truly believe in equality, please continue voting for the WP. The only way to stop all these things that are so wrong with the system is to have more and more opposition wards over the next few General Elections, till this government realises that they cannot continue in their approach of discriminating against their own citizens. Please think hard before you cast your vote on 26th May 2012.

This article is published by The Online Citizen, 20 Maxwell Road, #09-17 Maxwell House, Singapore 069113.

You May Also Like

12 new cases of Zika over the weekend; new cluster at Hougang Ave 7

The National Environment Agency (NEA) has stated that as of 19 September,…

Over 7,400 cartons of duty-unpaid cigarettes seized

A total of 7498 cartons and 16 packets of duty-unpaid cigarettes hidden…

Goh Chok Tong to undergo radiation therapy to ensure all cancerous cells are killed off

Emeritus Senior Minister (ESM) Goh Chok Tong took to his Facebook on…

民调反映选民认为行动党可信度下降

李光耀公共政策学院研究所,透过手机、互联网等访问4027名选民进行民意调查,了解选民的投票考量和倾向。 其中各年龄层选民对于人民行动党的可信赖程度(credibility)下降,40至49岁年龄阶层的选民跌幅最为急促,达13巴仙。35岁以下年轻选民,认为工人党比行动党更可信赖。 65岁以上选民,认为工人党可靠的反而增加至少20巴仙。认为行动党可靠的选民比率,从93下降至86巴仙。认为工人党可靠的选民,则从2015年的71巴仙,增至79巴仙。非常认同工人党可靠的选民,也从8巴仙,激增至20巴仙。 再者,认为政治应趋向多元的选民比例有所增加,至22.4巴仙。至于认同维持现状、应维持行动党一党独大局面的受访者,也从2015年的44.3巴仙,锐减至仅18.5巴仙。 在疫情当前,人们更关注政府管理的效率和民生课题,此次则要求政策的公平、确保有需要的群体能够获得帮助。不过多达89巴仙选民,如何应对冠病疫情,也左右选民的选票。