By Dr James Gomez –

The ISA has scared Singaporean society at three fundamental levels.

At the first level it has scared the individuals directly arrested and detained. Years after their release, almost all remain traumatized and psychological scarred from the experience. It takes a life-time to break out of this experience. I am glad to note a change as more from this group have come forward.

At the second level immediate family members, friends, associates from work and members from social organizations (e.g. church, welfare group, the arts, etc. that those detained under the ISA belonged to), also bear the long-time psychological effects. The fear of having being so near to those arrested and detained also does have a bearing on how this immediate group interacted with others especially when it came to engaging in political matters critical of the PAP government. There is certainly less fear among them now.

At the third level, in the general body politic, it had scarred a whole nation into self-censorship. It prevented many for the longest time from taking an active stance in our domestic politics, leaving it to a few to lead the charge. Even today it is not unusual to evoke the comment that the “ISD is watching or listening” whenever we hear an electronic crackle over the telephone line or an audio interference over a PA system at a meeting. Yes we laugh it off, but it belies a deep psychological fear. That is extent of ISA’s scar on Singaporean society. But we now have come a long way.

Collectively, this scar also extends to foreigners and visitors to Singapore and how they have and continue to conduct themselves when it comes to speaking up on political injustices in Singapore or undertaking critical commentary. This the extents of the ISA’s psychological reach beyond our borders. I think to effect a change across the border would take a little bit longer as the ripple of change out of Singapore would need more time to travel.

Thus, 22 years ago when, I was an Arts and Social Science student in NUS I asked Lee Kuan Kew at the 1990 NUS Forum: Lee Kuan Yew on ISA and Marxist Conspiracy whether Singapore would consider abolishing the ISA given the region had become much more stable. I was not convinced of the answer.

Back then, those of us who spoke up against the ISA were few, now we are a little more and from all three levels. I am confident that together we can work to abolish the ISA.

 

Dr. James Gomez, a 3rd year undergrad at NUS in 1990, asked Lee Kuan Yew whether he would abolish the ISA.

This article is published by The Online Citizen, 20 Maxwell Road, #09-17 Maxwell House, Singapore 069113.

You May Also Like

之前七患者皆在中国染病 台湾爆发首宗本土感染病例

台湾爆发首宗本土传染武汉肺炎确诊病例,当地政府立刻向前往中国者发出警告,呼吁人民若非必要,避免前往中国。 台湾和中国有着密切的经济和文化联系,而该岛至今已经出现了八宗确诊病例。 台湾中央及流行疫情指挥中心召开紧急发布会指出,岛上最新的第八宗病例是岛上的首宗本土传染病例,之前的病例患者都是在中国感染上的。 最新确诊病例患者为居住在台湾中部的50余岁男子,他是受到自中国工作返乡的妻子感染。目前男子的情况稳定。 另一方面,指挥中心表示已经向居民们发出警告,尽管香港和澳门除外,但是若非必要就不要到中国湖北省。 台湾也限制了大部分中国游客入境。 台湾政府于上周宣布一项为期一个月的禁令,禁止出口医务人员专用口罩,并表示必须先照顾自己人民的需要。 目前当地一些药房都面临口罩货源不足问题,而政府已经表示会努力确保供应,并宣布将发布更多口罩,但是限制每个人最多只能购买三个口罩。 台湾总统蔡英文在新年会民活动上指出,政府已经做好充分准备应对武汉肺炎的袭击,促请人们不要惊慌。“我们的防疫工作不会放假,而是每天24小时进行。”

二匪闯入金店抢劫 持枪保安行动网民褒贬参半

真实枪战在现实生活上演?当你是遭劫金店的持枪保安时,你会开枪还是逃跑呢? 有网民于周日(23日)分享了一段金店抢劫案的视频,并指该抢劫案发生在我们的邻国,马来西亚。 帖文中写道,“马来西亚勇敢的保安,尝试阻止两名抢劫金店的匪徒逃跑”。 短短只有15秒的视频中,只见在一家购物广场内的金饰商店遭两名匪徒抢劫,而商店的保安则拿着枪支站在店外面,枪头朝着店内。 而当时金店内藏着两名抢匪,其中一人在接近商店出口的柜子旁边。 当时情景非常紧张,甚至有声音说道,“躲着,躲着,柜子后面”。而事后,两名匪徒成功逃跑。 视频在脸书上疯传,吸引了超过7万6000人观看,以及579人反应。不少网民质疑保安的素质,谴责他不应该持枪却将自己暴露在匪徒可攻击的范围,“若匪徒持枪,那么保安就‘拜拜’了”、“怎么不开抢,金店的保安不是都获得持枪准证吗?”。 然而,事实上,保安并不能胡乱开枪,尤其是在公众场合之下,因此不少网民也为保安说话缓颊。 据马来西亚《星报》指出,金店抢劫案发生在马来西亚巴生的武吉丁宜一家购物广场内,金店的员工当时已准备关门结束一天的工作了,两名戴着深色电单车头盔的男子闯入店内,并用锤头敲破玻璃,抢走摆设的金饰。 虽然在视频中见到两名抢匪成功逃走,然而他们并没有成功逃出购物广场。抢匪最终在数名商家的合作之下被逮捕,并被移交警察。

国大生犯非礼罪判缓刑遭质疑 法官:不应视缓刑为“判刑较轻”

今年9月,国大生萧凯运(译音)于地铁站和车厢内三度非礼女性大腿和臀部被控上法庭,却因成绩好判处21个月缓刑,引起公众不满,认为判决过轻。法官对此回应,不应将缓刑视为“判刑较轻”的判决。 《海峡时报》报道,地方法官Jasvender Kaur表示,“在21个月的缓刑期间,他必须完成150个小时的社区服务,接受宵禁与参加针对罪行而设置的课程,减低再犯风险,使他能够再重回社会。” 23岁的被告萧凯运(译音)为一名国大生,他承认于去年9月12日晚上11时25分,在乘搭朝榜鹅地铁站方向的东北列车上,用左手触碰一名28岁女郎的双腿以及臀部。 地方法官认为被告在犯罪时显然是不成熟的心智状态,才会犯下罪行,所以目前的判处不仅符合被告,也符合社会最佳利益。 然而,对检察官而言,非礼行为是严重的指控,尤其是发生在公共交通工具上。检察官Deborah Lee和 Benedict Chan评估,萧凯运已符合成年人嫌犯条件,因此缓刑对他而言更像是一起例外,而非常态。 检察官进一步补充道,萧凯运自2016年8月开始,便出现恶习。针对萧凯运过往的行为,其表现并未出现强烈的改变意图,也正因他过去曾在公共交通工具上非礼,而强化了他的犯罪行为,成为根深蒂固的恶习。目前检察官将对判决提出上诉,要求判处6周监禁。 法官称罪行为受害者带来痛苦,但却未有受害者受到心理创伤 对此,法官承认,在公共交通上犯下非礼罪为严重罪行,但即使罪行相当严重,但伤害性质相对较轻,因此更应该注重其后的康复工作。…