~ By Benjamin Cheah ~

“Hougang is not for sale!” Mr Png Eng Huat declared. In his maiden rally of the Hougang by-election, this is the battle cry of the Workers’ Party (WP) as it kicks off its campaign for Hougang in earnest.

The rally focused on a central narrative: the residents of Hougang voting for the Workers’ Party, in spite of threats and promises from the People’s Action Party. “For the past 20 years, Hougang voters have been zapped by lightning,” Party Chairman Ms Sylvia Lim said. After consistently returning a WP candidate to Parliament in past elections, the government has reduced public transport routes in Hougang and gave opposition-held wards the least priority for flat upgrading schemes. The People’s Action Party (PAP) has also promised Hougang a hundred million-dollar flat upgrading program should voters send a PAP candidate to Parliament. In spite of this, she said, the voters of Hougang stood firm and continued to vote in the Workers’ Party. She thanked the voters for continuing to vote for the opposition,saying “we’ve only just begun” and “the best is yet to come”.

Supporting this narrative was a hailstorm of criticism aimed at the PAP’s policies. “Many problems faced by Hougang residents are national issues,” Member of Parliament (MP) Mr Chen Show Mao said, mentioning the income gap, job prospects and cost of living. Speaker after speaker followed this theme, pointing their fingers at the PAP.
 
Party veteran Mr Lim Ee Ping argued that achieving better work-life balance is a better solution to the falling birth rate than increasing the number of immigrants. Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) Yee Jenn Jong criticised the number of scholarships awarded to foreign students, arguing that many of them do not achieve high academic standards and do not contribute to Singapore, and questioning the policy’s effectiveness. MP Mr Pritam Singh launched a scathing review of corrupt PAP politicians, such as Choo Wee Khiang and Teh Cheang Wan, saying that the people “cannot rely on the PAP to set the standards of politics.” “We will put things right, no matter what the cost!” Mr Singh added.
 
NCMP Mr Gerald Giam criticised the recent MRT breakdowns, stating that the government imported a large number of foreigners without upgrading the infrastructure to match the increased capacity. Mr Giam said that the WP has voiced the people’s concerns, and the WP needs more MPs in Parliament to better represent the people’s wishes.
 
Mr Png continued the narrative, saying the PAP “does not know anything about building an inclusive society” and “one thing you should never do is threaten voters”. Mr Png pointed out that Anson constituency, once held by the opposition, had disappeared, and Potong Pasir might suffer the same fate. He said Hougang must never forget this fact, and the children of Hougang must never forget that their parents had sacrificed much for their country. He argued that the PAP “threatened” democracy, and urged the crowd to “keep our fragile democracy alive”. Adding that Singapore has “a long way to go towards a First World Parliament”, he asked voters to vote WP for a First World Parliament.
 
Inevitably, the speakers drew comparisons between Mr Png and his PAP rival, Mr Desmond Choo. Speakers were initially content to highlight Mr Png’s positive traits. They spoke about his dedication to his family and community, his technical know-how, and his familiarity with the workings of Parliament thanks to his background as Mr Low’s Legislative Assistant. Mr Giam emphasised that he is a “good man” who has the ability to “analyze policies that affect the lives of the people”.
 
During his closing speech, Mr Low drew comparisons between Mr Png and his PAP counterpart, Mr Desmond Choo. Focusing on Mr Png’s affiliations, Mr Low questioned Mr Choo’s previous assertions that he can be an independent voice, saying that Mr Choo could not be truly independent unless he ran as an independent candidate. Mr Low also implied that Mr Choo’s candidacy was irrelevant. Mr Choo is a grassroots advisor and a unionist, Mr Low said, so Mr Choo would need to fulfil his election promises anyway.
 
The shadow of the Yaw Shin Leong scandal briefly emerged during the rally. Mr Singh’s remark on making things right might have been a veiled reference to the party expelling Mr Yaw, which triggered the by-election. Mr Low said that the WP had to show “political courage” by sacking Mr Yaw. Just as briefly, all mentions of Mr Yaw disappeared. It appeared to be an attempt to address the still-ongoing concerns about the incident, but the
rally was clearly focused on promoting the party and Mr Png.
 
The most striking observation throughout the rally was the reaction of the crowd. About 8,000 people turned out during the rally, but they were significantly quieter than rally-goers during the 2012 general elections. Despite multiple attempts to rally the crowd, most notably by Mr Giam during his speech, much of the audience failed to respond to the speakers. Much of the cheering seemed to have come from WP supporters and volunteers near the front; the back ranks of the crowd were noticeably quiet. The crowd only came to life when Ms Lim and Mr Low took the stage — and during certain pointed remarks aimed at the PAP. Even Mr Low had to encourage the crowd to cheer for Mr Png when it was his turn to speak, and even that
did not result in much greater enthusiasm.
 
The crowd reaction, coupled with the WP’s focus on national issues, suggests that the WP is banking on its brand name for this by-election. Mr Choo arguably has greater ground experience and visibility than Mr Png, first by being the PAP’s Hougang candidate during the general election and later by serving as the grassroots advisor. Mr Png’s reception indicates that he has won the support of relatively few people who are not already WP supporters.
 
While the speakers did take time to paint Mr Png in a positive light, the primary purpose of the rally was to criticise the PAP and further promote the WP concept of a First World Parliament and the general notion of democracy in Singapore.
 
This may be the only logical approach for the WP. Mr Png cannot hope to close the gap in exposure and experience with Mr Choo during the hustings. The party has to use its brand to counter Mr Choo’s personality, and to play the underdog opposition card as much as it can. If the crowd reaction is any gauge, the contest for Hougang is too close to call at this stage. One thing seems to be sure, though: the WP needs to fight hard to come anywhere close to the heights of popularity it achieved during GE2011.
 
This article is published by The Online Citizen, 20 Maxwell Road, #09-17 Maxwell House, Singapore 069113.
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

印尼巴淡岛吁居民暂停访新行程 防止病毒传染

自我国颁布新的边境限制后,印尼廖内群岛的巴淡岛政府也要求居民暂停前往我国,以防止病毒传染。 《雅加达邮报》报道,巴淡市副市长阿姆萨卡尔(Amsakar)表示,“我们将发布一份通告,建议居民在未来两周内暂停出国旅游,尤其是新加坡。” 他表示,他一直在与新加坡驻巴淡总领事官员商讨旅行限制一事。 他也补充,该新令并不适用于全印尼人民,然而他也提醒,若印尼人想要在此刻入境新加坡,可能会花上很长的时间,因为在他们入境那一刻将会被隔离两周。 阿姆萨卡尔也说明,他能够理解部分印尼人会前往新加坡寻求医疗资源,但他们也不希望印尼人因为新加坡的检疫政策而在新加坡逗留太久。 而他也补充道,当地政府无法在技术上限制新加坡人入境巴淡岛,因为外国人的健康检测是由港口卫生办公室(KKP)负责,而该办事处隶属卫生部。 “虽然新加坡也在试图阻止民众出国,但入境我国的新加坡人也会接受严格的检查。” 我国早前是宣布从16日起,过去14天曾去过东盟(ASEAN)国家、瑞士、英国、日本等地的旅客、本地居民和长期准证持有者,都需要遵守14天的居家通知(Stay-Home Notice)。 不过,国家发展部长黄循财表示,以上措施不会针对每日从海路或陆路出入境的我国或马国人士。“这是有鉴于两国由很高程度的相互依赖关系,因此需单独作出考量,双方官员正通过两国的疫情对策小组商讨,另作安排。”

PA created to ‘blur line between Government and PAP” – SPP

Statement by Benjamin Pwee of the Singapore People’s Party The People’s Association…

Singapore should stop calling itself a 'global leader' on climate change; young climate strikers are determined to fight for change despite investigations

On 13 March, Singapore saw its first climate strike when an 18-year-old…

港万人机场集会 所有航班遭取消

据新加坡驻香港总领事馆在脸书专页通知,有鉴于香港机场出现逾万名港民聚集接机大堂集会,当地机场管理局于今日(12日)下午4时许宣布,机场运作严重受阻,所有航班已即时取消。 该领事馆促请在当地或前往旅游的新加坡人宜检查航班情况,并吁请国人在港期间保持警惕,注意安全,并留意当地动态和听从有关当局的指令。 当局也鼓励到港旅游国人宜在外交部官网https://eregister.mfa.gov.sg/注册,以方便该部在必要时期可联络他们。 如需驻港领事馆或外交部协助,可联系: 新加坡驻香港总领事馆 电话: +852-2527-2212 或 +852-9466-1251 (下班时间之后) 传真:+852-2861-3595 电邮: [email protected]