~ By Leong Sze Hian ~

Billy (not his real name) thanks the numerous valuable suggestions (here) and words of encouragement that he has received from TOC readers on how he can resolve his housing problem. Billy has already taken action based on some of the suggestions that were posted in the comments section. Below are some of the suggestions that he has followed up on. He also seeks further advice from TOC readers on how he can overcome the bureaucratic roadblocks that he has run into.

Billy conveys his gratitude

To TOC Reader ‘Clown’

Thank you for your suggestion to check on the recent resale transactions. According to HDB's web site, the 3-room resale flat transactions in his street over the last two months range from $316,000 to $395,000. This is almost $100,000 higher than the foreclosure value of $229,000 offered by HDB.

To TOC Reader ‘just a suggestion’

Thank you for your suggestion to apply for a court order. Billy has been communicating with the Legal Aid Bureau and in the last letter to him about two months ago, they said the following:

"We refer to the letter dated 13 February 2012 from your Member of Parliament which we received on 21 February 2012. You had previously applied for legal aid to commence Court proceedings such that (your wife's) share of the matrimonial flat is transferred to yourself as the sole owner of the said flat. The Legal Aid Bureau had considered your case and refused aid to you. You were informed in our letter that you have to furnish a copy of the Divorce Court Order granted by the US Courts which would prove that you are no longer married to (her). This order is necessary before any court proceedings in Singapore can be commenced to deal with the matrimonial flat. You were also informed that once you obtain a copy of the said Court Order, you can reapply for legal aid. Please note legal aid was refused for your last application because you did not produce the Divorce Court Order.”

Billy has given the Legal Aid Bureau in Singapore, a copy of a "Notice of Entry of Judgement" which he received from the United States of America in the mail, indicating that (a marriage) dissolution was entered in the Supreme Court of California, Orange County, U.S.A.  However, the Legal Aid Bureau does not accept this document as they require the "Divorce Court Order." Billy seeks solutions and suggestions so that he can overcome this deadlock.

Focus on helping Billy now

To TOC reader ‘Chan Joon Yee’  

Thank you for your remarks. I concur that we should focus on Billy's predicament and unfortunate circumstances and please continue to give your views and suggestions.

Billy has communicated with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) and has sought their help in locating or contacting his wife. I am wondering whether it would it be possible to ask MFA and the Singapore Embassy to assist him obtain a copy of the "Divorce Court Order" from the USA that the Legal Aid Bureau requires? Please let us know as to how we can go about getting a copy of this document?

More suggestions

Do keep your suggestions coming so that we can try to help Billy save his home and possibly avert HDB's Compulsory Acquisition on the 16 May 2012.

We also hope that the HDB will give him more time to liaise with the Legal Aid Bureau, MFA and the other relevant authorities. 

_________________

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【选举】尚穆根指前进党不热衷打义顺 毕博渊:有人惧怕对手

在今日(1日)的线上记者会,原律政兼内政部长尚穆根,指前进党似乎对于攻打义顺“三心两意”,而上周还曾与其他政党协调对换其他选区。 事实上,早在上月26日,前进党既已决定攻打义顺集选区的人选,包括毕博渊(Bradley Bowyer)、郑财成、卡拉(Kala Manickam)、道菲克(Taufik Supan)以及斯里纳拉(Sri Nallakaruppan)。 尚穆根称,本身不想揣测,但似乎前进党在此事“三心两意”。 前进党候选人毕博渊则很快作出回应,遗憾主流媒体的偏驳报导,似乎让义顺选民不用认真看待前进党,他也指这显示对方惧怕竞争对手,因此试图在选民面前施障眼法。 毕博渊也强调,前进党团队在选区划分检讨委会报告出炉后,就一直在义顺筹备,且根据阻断措施下的规则备战,但却没人愿意提起此事。

A Seismic Loss of Faith

by Lim Tean When the Prime Minister and his two Deputy Prime…

Oil trading company Hin Leong covered up US$800 million losses from creditors

According to sources, the founder of Singapore oil trading company Hin Leong…

感谢英女皇御用大状彭立克建言 李绳武分享仍遭新加坡政府起诉

“朋友很常问我,即便是到现在,新加坡政府是否还在起诉我。答案是,是的。我才刚提呈我的书面证词。” 李显扬之子、也是哈佛经济教授的李绳武,今日(25日)在脸书分享近况,他的朋友关心,他此前的脸书贴文,被指涉嫌藐视法庭一案,是否还遭到新加坡政府起诉。对此李绳武证实,他刚提交书面证词。 回顾2017年7月15日,身为建国总理李光耀孙子、也是现任总理李显龙侄子的李绳武,在脸书贴文批评我国政府“好诉讼”(ligitious),法庭制度“温顺”(pliant),被总检察署指控藐视法庭。 他透露,过去两年,他的法律团队都得到英女皇御用律师彭力克(David Pannick,也是知名宪法专家)的建言,他感谢后者的引导和协助,“即便他仍努力赢取英国最具有里程碑意义的宪法诉讼之中。” 陈清木也曾针对总统选举议题,请教彭力克 据了解,彭力克男爵此人非同小可,在英国乃至国际都是知名的法律人士,最擅长公民法、公民自由和人权,也曾多次参与香港的法律诉讼。 除了李绳武,实际上前总统候选人、也是现任前进党秘书长的陈清木,曾在2017年请教彭力克,询问他有关民选总统是否从黄金辉算起。对此,彭力克提出不同意总检察长的建议,并指出有关民选总统选举(修正) 法令第22节条文是不符合宪法的。 今年四月,由大法官梅达顺、上诉庭法官郑永光和庄泓翔所组成的三司,裁定驳回李绳武的上诉,总检察署获准在美国递交法律文件给李绳武。 当时,李绳武对上诉裁决表达失望,不过也指出,总检察署仍要拿出足够理据证明,他的私人脸书贴文何种程度上贬砥了新加坡的司法机构。