Press statement issued by Tan Jee Say 

I welcome the Prime Minister's decision to call for a by-election in Hougang.

In addition to allowing the people of Hougang to be represented in Parliament, the Hougang by-election has also put the issue of opposition unity into focus. Our first priority is to ensure that Hougang remains with the opposition and not fall into the hands of the PAP. At this juncture of our  political development post-GE2011, the best way forward is for all of us to support WP in its defence of the seat against the PAP. I am sure WP will appreciate this gesture of political cooperation from individuals and other opposition parties alike and will reciprocate accordingly in the run up to the 2016 general election.
 
Opposition unity is the concern of every one and is not a one-way street. All must play their part. Supporters of opposition unity rightly expect all opposition parties to work together, cooperating and complementing each other to maximize their chances of success at the polls  to advance democracy in Singapore.
 
There is much for every opposition party to do to ensure victory in the 2016 GE. Going forward, voters want more than a mere opposition voice in Parliament. They want alternative policies to be presented to them to deal with the pressing issues facing Singaporeans that the ruling party seems unable to handle. The next GE will be fought on quality of candidates and coherence of policy proposals. We have the  responsibility  to offer good candidates with well thought out policy alternatives to our fellow Singaporeans. We should concentrate our resources on recruiting the best candidates to join our ranks and together formulate good policy alternatives. Intruding into fellow opposition parties' wards will dilute our resources and not maximize our strengths.
 
The Hougang by-election is an opportunity to demonstrate oppositon unity and build opposition co-operation towards the next general election.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

UWS dolphins and otters kept in poor conditions: Wildlife groups

A report by Wildlife Watcher Singapore in collaboration with the Sea Shepard Conservation Society has…

近三百人失候选人资格 党委不得参政 泰法院宣判爱国党解散

泰国大选在即,泰国爱国党(Thai Raksa Chart)因推荐公主成为首相候选人闹上官司,昨日泰国宪法法院正式宣判解散爱国党,该党所有282名候选人即刻失去参选资格,而党行政执委也被限制在未来10年内不能参与任何政治活动。 泰国将于本月24日举行全国大选,登记候选人的截止日期已过,因此爱国党面对解散判决,意味着其候选人将无缘此次大选。换言之,在来届大选中,军政府的敌手就少了一个劲敌,而前首相他信回国之路再添阻。 宪法法院于昨日下午宣判,指爱国党推选皇室成员为候选人违反了《政党法》、抵触君主制在政治立场上的中立立场。法院也重申宪法规定皇室成员凌驾于政治之说,必须在政治立场上保持中立,不能参政。 法院指出,虽然爱国党有选择候选人的自由和权力,但是他们的选择不可为君主立宪制政体带来不利影响,也不可以破坏或损坏君主制的政治中立立场。 爱国党接受判决 爱国党党魁布伊普查在超过20名党员和党委的陪同下,到法院聆听审判。接获有关宣判后,他虽然显得情绪激动,但是仍然对记者表示接受判决,感谢支持者一路的支持,但是仍然会怀着对国家有利的善意去做事。 现场的支持者对有关的判决感到无力,甚至落泪。现场也见警员戒备。基于案件的特殊性,泰国警方出动了超过1200人部署在法院内外和四周。据悉,现场更安装了愈70部监视器,媒体不获准进入法院内,只能在大厅外观看电视现场直播。 公主:令人沮丧的消息 爱国党于2月8日宣布推荐泰王长姐乌汶叻公主竞选首相职位,当天晚上泰王就发出皇室文告,斥责有关的举动极为不恰当,违反了宪法,也违反了皇室立场。选举委员会在数日后宣布乌汶叻公主不符合候选人资格,并且将对爱国党采取法律行动。 身在德国的乌汶叻公主在接获有关消息后,透过Instagram向支持者说道,“爱国党被解散是一个非常悲伤和令人沮丧的消息“。…

国家剧场尖棱代表国旗五星? 《海峡时报》诠释遭建筑师打脸

上周,本地英文媒体《海峡时报》在脸书上载一则短片,纪念国家剧场在1963年8月8日开幕。在文字说明中,该报称该剧场标志性的五个擎天尖棱结构,代表着新加坡国旗上的五星。 然而,有关解说随即遭到新加坡科技设计大学客座助理教授赖启健反驳,指出这是很主观的诠释。 有网民就提出,有关代表国旗五星说,也被记载在国家图书馆局官方网站,此外还有剧场前的喷泉,则代表国旗上的新月。 对此,赖启健说明,两种说法都有谬误,是很主观的诠释,但是久而久之所有人都信以为真了。“不管是图书馆局还是国家文物局都错了,现在轮到《海峡时报》。” 在过去受国家博物馆之邀,讲解国内四大代表性建筑的讲座,赖启健曾指出,由本地大师王匡国操刀,国家剧场有了不起的建筑设计,其中五个擎天尖棱,它们连同舞台和边墙,支撑起剧场的横梁。(见以下短片) 赖启健也引用王匡国的著作《意外国家的生活追忆》,指出五大尖棱的建设从未用以代表国旗上的五星,至于喷泉也不属国家剧场的部分,而是后期由副总理杜进才博士推广美化计划,才在较后完成的。(见文章开端的照片,显示剧场在喷泉落成前后的景观。) 媒体仰赖官方机构,例如国家图书馆局提供的资料。然而即便掌控国家重要文史资料的机构,也会收藏与事实不符的信息。 更何况,国家剧场在我国历史上是富有代表性的建筑,其设计师对建筑的功能理应做了充足的描述,但是如果国家文史机构记载与史实不符的资讯,引起民众对历史认知出现谬误,误导历史观的情况是令人不安的。

PAP and PAY

Dr Wong Wee Nam / In 1996, when the formula for the…