By the organising committee of 'That we may dream again: Remembering the 1987 'Marxist Conspiracy' 

The Internal Security Act or the ISA as it is notoriously known, is the most unjust and intimidating law enacted during peace time in Malaya and forced upon Singapore by the colonial authorities.

Japan invaded Malaya in December 1941 and Singapore fell on 15 February 1942. The British promptly left Malaya leaving the Communist Party of Malaya (CPM) to resist the occupation. The courage and sacrifice of the CPM during the war years is well known and acknowledged by both the people and the British after the war. 

When the British returned to Malaya in 1945, they presented Chin Peng, the leader of the CPM with two medals and awarded him the highest honour for outstanding achievement, namely the Order of the British Empire (OBE). Wu Tian Wang, a representative of the CPM was appointed by the British as a member of the Advisory Council. 

But the alliance between the British and the CPM came to an end shortly after. The murder of three white men in plantations in Malaya gave the British the excuse to declare a state of emergency and to introduce emergency regulations in Malaya in 1948. The CPM was declared an illegal organisation.

Singapore was then a crown colony. Because of her proximity to mainland Malaya, the British also proclaimed a state of emergency on the island. Their excuse was that they did not want the island to be used by the communists. The proclamation of emergency was supposed to be effective for just three months.  Sadly, the British abused their power and extended the emergency for seven years and more.

In 1955, Singapore’s then Chief Minister, David Marshall introduced the Preservation of Public Security Ordinance (PPSO). He took great care to insert two safeguards:

(a) An independent Appeal Tribunal comprising two High Court judges and one District Court judge who had full powers to order the release of detainees.

(b)  A mandatory review, at least once in every six months, of a detention order or restriction order by a Reviewing Officer who must be a person qualified to be a judge. The Reviewing Officer had the duty to make recommendations to the Chief Secretary or to the Appeal Tribunal.

PAP used ISA for its own ends

The PAP which was then in opposition, vehemently opposed the law. However when it came into power in 1959, it immediately removed the above two safeguards by replacing the Appeal Tribunal with an Advisory Committee, comprising a judge and two lay persons. As the name implies, the Committee’s power was reduced to one that could only advise the Yang di-Pertuan Negara (Head of State).

In 1963, Singapore joined the Federation of Malaysia. The Malaysian Internal Security Act (1960) with modifications, was introduced to Singapore. The new Act enacted the Advisory Board which basically performs the same function as the Advisory Committee. When Singapore left Malaysia in 1965, the ISA continues to be in force.

The government claims that when the Board recommends the release of a prisoner, he/she has to be released unless the President of Singapore decides to veto the Board’s recommendation.  This very limited power of the Board and the President does not detract from the fundamental evil authorised by the law.

ISA Detainees

An ISA detainee is imprisoned without a trial for an indefinite period of time. Thousands have been detained without trial and a significant number like Dr Chia Thye Poh, Dr Lim Hock Siew, Ho Piao, Lee Tee Tong, Said Zahari and Dr Poh Soo Kai have been detained for decades. Many have been severely tortured. Just imagine the hardship caused to the detainees and their families. Imagine the loss to Singapore with so many brilliant people spending the prime of their lives in prison.

There has not been any debate in Singapore as to why we should not abolish the ISA. The situation in Malaysia has improved. After severe criticisms from the people, Malaysia abolished the ISA in April 2012.

In 1991, then Deputy Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong was asked why the ISA was still needed in Singapore even though the CPM no longer posed a threat. His reply was that if Malaysia did not abolish the Act, it must have its reasons. Singapore would seriously consider abolishing the ISA if Malaysia were to do so. Now that Malaysia has repealed the ISA, would Singapore do likewise?

If Singapore is truly a first world nation, there is no place for detention without trial. Every citizen has the right to freedom of speech, assembly and expression.  As a member of the international community, Singapore has for 64 years flouted and continues to flout Article 9 of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights which reads:

“No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.”

The ISA, a tool of our colonial masters, has been used to full  effect  in post colonial Singapore against law abiding citizens. If Singapore claims to be fully democratic, then there can absolutely be no doubt that the ISA must be abolished.

You just need to ask yourself one question: Would you feel wronged if you were arrested and have no means to defend yourself, i.e. detained without trial, for an indefinite period of time? If your answer is “yes”, then join in the call for the abolition of the ISA now!


About the event

More than 2,500 Singaporeans have been detained under the Internal Security Act (ISA) since the 1960’s. The ISA, which allows the arrest and indefinite detention of citizens without trial, is a blunt National security instrument open to abuse by governments which can use, and have used, it in the decimation of legitimate organisations and individuals opposed to their social, economic and political directions.

Operation Spectrum

25th Anniversary of Operation Spectrum “Operation Spectrum” was mounted by the Singapore government on 21 May 1987 under the ISA. Sixteen individuals were arrested in the first wave, with another six detained soon after. Two of the lawyers (including a former Solicitor-General of Singapore) who represented these individuals were subsequently detained as well. The 24 arrested were mainly professionals such as lawyers, journalists, community and church workers and entrepreneurs.

The government alleged that the detainees were “Marxist conspirators”, without giving them the right of defence in an open court. Instead, public “confessions” were elicited under the threat of indefinite detention without trial.

These “confessions” were repudiated in a press statement by nine of these individuals some months after their release.  Eight of them were immediately re-arrested the next day, while the ninth signatory was in England at the time of re-arrest.

Nothing substantial or credible was ever produced to corroborate the government’s allegations. Later documents showed even greater ambiguity in the reasons behind the detentions in 1987. An injustice was perpetuated and continues to linger to this day.

Function 8 Limited and Maruah as well as other civil society organisations, have come together as partners to remember the 25th anniversary of Operation Spectrum through a series of activities.

Amongst other activities, survivors of the 1987 “Marxist Conspiracy” will be sharing  stories of their lives before and after their detentions with members of the public.

Desired outcomes

We hope these activities would:

  1. Raise awareness on the misuse of the ISA in the past;
  2. raise awareness of the danger on the continued existence of the ISA which may lead to complacency of the authorities in dealing with real security threats to our country;
  3. work towards the abolition of the ISA; and
  4. press the government to welcome the return of those who  have been forced into exile because of the ISA, such a move being the first step towards national

 

A session themed "That We May Dream Again. Remembering the 1987 “Marxist Conspiracy” will be held from

3pm to 7pm |  Saturday 2nd June 2012  | Speakers’ Corner, Hong Lim Park.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

学生反映媒体过度渲染教师检查内衣颜色一事

本月29日,《新明日报》报导,指南洋女中学生家长向该报申诉,有老师在突击检查女学生内衣颜色时,,竟打开衣领纽扣,直接拉扯出内衣肩带,认为这种做法不恰当,并引发家长学生不满。 据报导,有关事件发生于本月22日。有关老师是中四年级主任。由于其中一班的级任老师是男的,不能进行衣着检查,便由该名主任代劳。 由于学校的校服是白色的,校方有规定,学生的内衣必须是白色或肉色,不能是任何其他颜色。 但这名老师被指在检查过程中,将学生衣领处纽扣解开,拉出学生内衣肩带检查。家长在申述时指有数名女学生都受到如此对待,而感到不满。 至于英媒《海峡时报》则报导,南洋女中公关主任坦言女教师的检查手法“可能引起学生不适”,在文告提及,校长也电邮给所有家长解释此事并致歉。 与此同时,也有一些学生在社交媒体对于教师的检查手法表达失望,不过目前这些贴文已被移除。 虽然媒体报导显示学生对此事感到失望,不过有关事件被检查的其中一名女学生现身说法,认为媒体可能过度渲染此事,实际上在当时老师进行突击检查,并没有向媒体所描述的那般糟糕。 老师尽责   已获校内师生原谅 名为Aurora Woo在脸书留言指出,实际上有关教师是好老师,尽责也受学生爱戴。 “老师的本意是要检查内衣颜色,大部分学生她也只是透过肩膀透视观察,只有对一名学生要求解开领扣。校方也承认和老师的沟通有出现误会,并不需要解开衣扣。而那名老师事后也马上向有关同学道歉。”…

Latest data: Number of foreign PMETs continues to increase in Singapore

Last week, the Manpower Ministry (MOM) finally released its foreign workforce numbers.…

陈硕茂以余光中《九广铁路》诗词寄语香港

工人党阿裕尼集选区议员陈硕茂,在脸书以诗人余光中的诗词《九广铁路》,寄予香港。 他分享道,过去数周对于许多选区居民,很常询问他对于香港目前局势的看法,令他感到惊讶。 尽管香港是“国外问题”,但新加坡人对香港人的福祉和未来所展现的关心,在他意料之外。“和许多人一样,香港在我心目中,占有特殊的位置。祝福香港的朋友们。” 余光中(1928-2017)《九广铁路》诗词原文: 你问我香港的滋味是什么滋味 握着你一方小邮简,我凄然笑了 香港是一种铿然的节奏,吾友 用一千只铁轮在铁轨上弹奏 向边境,自边境,日起到日落 北上南下反反复复奏不尽的边愁 剪不断碾不绝一根无奈的脐带 伸向北方的茫茫苍苍…

Exclusive Interview: Thai youth speak out – Hope, aspirations, and political perspectives ahead of elections

In a recent exclusive interview conducted by Simone Galimberti, a diverse group of Thai youth shared their perspectives, hopes, and aspirations for the upcoming elections. The conversation provided a unique insight into the minds of the young generation, highlighting their desire for real change and their nuanced understanding of the political landscape.