President Dr. Tony Tan Keng Yam of Singapore should commute the death sentence in the heroin possession case of Yong Vui Kong, Human Rights Watch said today in a letter to President Tan Keng Yam. Should he deny what could be a final request for clemency, Yong Vui Kong, a 20-year-old Malaysian national, could be executed within weeks.In November 2008, a Singapore court found Yong guilty under the Misuse of Drugs Act for possession of 42.27 grams of heroin. Under Singaporean law, possession of 15 grams or more of heroin carries a mandatory death sentence.

“Executing another young man for a narcotics offense will only reinforce the image of Singapore’s authorities as oblivious to basic rights and due process,” said Phil Robertson, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “Singapore’s mandatory death sentences clearly violate international human rights standards.”

While Human Rights Watch opposes the death penalty in all circumstances because of its inherent cruelty, Yong’s case raises additional human rights, humanitarian, and due process concerns, Human Rights Watch said. Singapore’s use of the death penalty is inconsistent with international human rights law, statements of UN human rights experts, and UN bodies.

Human rights law upholds every human being’s “inherent right to life” and limits the death penalty to “the most serious crimes,” typically crimes resulting in death. The mandatory nature of Singapore’s drug penalty has been criticized as violating international standards by eliminating the discretion of the court, making it impossible to take into account mitigating or extenuating circumstances and eliminating any individual determination of an appropriate sentence in a particular case.

The law minister, K. Shanmugam, contends that exceptions to the use of the death penalty based on personal circumstances would encourage more people to take up the drug trade, thus undermining Singapore’s anti-drug efforts. Even if these assertions were true – and Singapore declines to routinely make drug-related statistics public – it would not justify imposition of a penalty that so flagrantly violates fundamental rights over less severe penalties that would still act as a deterrent, Human Rights Watch said. There has been little national or international evidence to support the Singapore government’s assertion.

Singapore should join with the many countries already committed to the UN General Assembly’s December 18, 2007 resolution calling for a moratorium on executions and a move by member states toward abolition of the death penalty, Human Rights Watch said. In a March 2010 report, the UN Office on Drugs and Crimes called for an end to the death penalty and specifically urged member countries to prohibit use of the death penalty for drug-related offenses while urging countries to take an overall “human rights-based approach to drug and crime control.”

“Singapore should recognize that its reputation as a modern and highly developed country depends on its aligning with the growing global consensus against the death penalty,” Robertson said.


This article first appeared on Human Rights Watch entitled 'Singapore: 'Commute Death Sentence in Drug Case'

__________________

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

获取林学芬案审裁记录 律师公会:公众应向审裁庭秘书处购买

律师公会发出声明,指该公会不是纪律审裁庭资料库,也没有“法定义务(statutorily obliged)”把有关林学芬的审裁记录副本提供给公众。 昨日(3日),新加坡律师公会会长格雷戈瑞•维贾延德兰(Gregory Vijayendran)针对媒体询问,发表声明“厘清群众误解”,指民众应该去向审裁庭秘书处购买,而不是向该公会索取。 此前,在林学芬丈夫李显扬的一则帖文中,曾指出前者不认同审裁庭的报告,将在公堂审理时力争。 “群众都能透过律师公会获取有关闭门审裁庭审讯的完整记录。我呼吁群众仔细审视之,以达致他们对此事的独立结论。” 审裁庭秘书处是由最高法院设立,为审裁庭提供行政支援。 维贾延德兰称,民众可以从审裁庭秘书处,以一定费用购买有关记录副本。 他也表示,律师公会已遵循律师专业法令第93(5)条,在今年2月出版的公会月刊《法律公报》,发布有关审裁庭对林学芬的调查结果和裁决。 上月21日,纪律审裁庭发表裁决报告,裁定李显扬妻子林学芬,为已故建国总理李光耀准备遗嘱一事,专业行为失当,违反律师专业法令。 《海峡时报》星期刊报导引述审裁庭对林学芬妻子措辞严厉的批评,指责后者“不诚实,试图将证据形塑成自己是无辜受害者的形象”,以及“李显扬的行为也同样欺瞒。” 目前,林学芬的案子相信将转介到三司特别庭(Court…

WP’s Gerald Giam to ask MINDEF in Parliament the need to have NDP celebration amid pandemic

The Workers’ Party (WP) Member of Parliament (MP) for Aljunied GRC Gerald…

新美延续1990防务备忘录 允美方续使用我国军事设施

我国总理李显龙,在美国时间23日(我国今日凌晨)在纽约会晤美国总统川普。双方签署1990年防务合作谅解备忘录(2019年修正协定),允许美方继续使用我国军事设施,为期15年。 1990年防务合作谅解备忘录,是由建国总理李光耀,和时任美国副总统奎尔(Dan Quayle)签署。有关协议让美国军方可使用我国空军和海军基地,提供过境人员、军舰和军机后勤支持。 1990年谅解备忘录的期限是15年,新美两国曾在2005年续订一次,这是第二次更新协定。 文告称,在协定范围下,美方从2013至2015年,轮流派遣战斗机到我国进行演习、添油和维修整备;以及派出濒海战斗舰和P-8波塞冬海上巡逻机到访新加坡。 “协定的更新,重申对美国在本区域存在的支持,这对于区域和平、稳定与繁荣至关重要。” 李总理则在签署仪式上称,协定反映新美两国在国防事务上的良好合作,也反映两国在许多其他领域的广泛合作,如安全、经济、反恐,及文化和教育领域。 另一方面,国防部长黄永宏在稍早时也与美方国防秘书Mark Esper通话,双方乐见协定重新签署,为未来十年国防联系良好进展打下基础。 根据文告,黄永宏将作为总理代表团继续待在纽约至26日,至于总理则从本月21日至28日,留在纽约出席联合国大会。  

Malaysian govt ready for Malaysia-Singapore cross-border travel starting 17 Aug

The Malaysian government has announced that it is ready for the cross-border…