~ By Leong Sze Hian ~

I refer to the occasional paper, Citizen Population Scenarios, published by the National Population and Talent Division, Prime Minister’s Office, in April.

Highlights:-

Singapore’s Total Fertility Rate has been declining. At the same time, Singaporeans are living longer. Our life expectancy is currently one of the highest in the world. At current birth rates and without immigration, our citizen population is projected to shrink by around 2025. By 2020, as more citizens exit the working-age band of 20 to 64 years than those entering, the pool of working-age citizens will start to shrink. Our TFR has been below that needed to replace ourselves2 since 1976. An immigration inflow of between 20K and 25K new citizens each year will keep the citizen population size stable. An inflow of 25K new citizens per year would keep the size of our working-age citizen population relatively stable”

“The shrinking working-age population and increasingly aged population will result in a deterioration of the citizen old-age support ratio. As of June 2011, there were 6.3 citizens in the working-ages of 20-64 years, to every citizen aged 65 years and above. With current fertility and no immigration, there will only be 2.1 workingage citizens to each elderly citizen by 2030 (See Scenario B in Chart 8). Immigration has a mitigating effect on the old-age support ratio”

Would that include just new citizens or PRs as well?

Why is it that the population scenarios are only based on immigration of new citizens? Why not include permanent residents (PRs) as well. Wouldn't PRs also mitigate our population issues, instead of just relying entirely on new citizens?

I think one perspective of the issue is not so much of new citizens or PRs, but rather the quality of the new citizens or PRs.

In this connection, I once met an elderly cleaner Singapore resident in a food court who told me that his daughter who is also a cleaner obtained residency status because she married a Singaporean, and both he and his wife, who is also a cleaner, were given residency.

Impact of immigration on Singaporeans

We should consider carefully how to balance the need to increase the population, with the impact on citizens, such as the deterioration of the standard of living of more Singaporeans, declining real wages, rising cost of living, etc.?

We also need to re-evaluate the huge sums of money, like scholarships and tuition grants for foreigners, that are expended towards the “new citizens” immigration policy, against the needs and welfare of Singaporeans.

_____________________

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Breaking News: 9 opposition MPs, including NCMPs, to be allowed

There will be a guaranteed nine MPs from opposition parties in Parliament.

Govt issues correction directions to States Times Review, AB-TC City News for false information on Wuhan coronavirus situation in S’pore

Trade and Industry Minister Chan Chun Sing on Fri (31 Jan) has…

与奥巴马合照、英超球会收购风波女主角 竟也是共青团员?

因宣布要收购英超球会“喜鹊”纽卡斯尔(Newcastle),贝拉格夫维新集团(Bellagraph Nova Group,以下简称BN集团),一时引起轰动,不料却被踢爆,原本该集团中国女商人沈屮(chè)、本地商人罗尔伟和罗弥伦,与奥巴马合影竟是造假! 该集团在本月22日,承认对有关与奥巴马合影“动过手脚”作为宣传材料。奥巴马去年12月在新加坡出席一场慈善晚宴,与沈屮交谈的一张照片,背后的黑色背景竟被加上BN集团标志,以及把本地商人罗尔伟Terence Loh,也修进照片中,坐在奥巴马右侧: 据《海峡时报》报道,BN集团是今年6月成立的投资集团,由沈屮(evangeline shen)的贝拉格夫集团(Bellagraph Group)以及本地商人堂兄弟罗尔伟和罗弥伦的Lohs Dorr Group合并而成。 被卷入篡改照片风波,BN集团称照片是“一名犯错的个人所为,而且这人可能存有恶意”,并委任独立律师调查这起事件。 中国女商人沈屮,毕业自名校复旦大学和人民大学,2011年通过律师资格考试,2012年取得律师资格;在2017年的一次采访,沈屮被形容来自具影响力家庭,丈夫与家人从事宝石生意已有时日。…