~ By Texas Hong ~

A cleaning lady works in the pantry of my office, doing simple chores. Let’s call her Lucy. Yesterday, she told me how she admired the design of my cup that I use in the office. Curiously, she wanted to know how much I bought it for.

“Ten dollars”, I said proudly, thinking that I managed a good deal.

Lucy walked away with her head bowed; muttering words which meant that it is very expensive and that I must be earning a lot of money. No I do not earn a lot of money, but to the cleaning lady, she thinks I do.

This made me reflect upon the on-going debate about Professor Lim Chong Yah’s proposal to structurally raise wages of low income earners. This made Lim Swee Say remind Singaporeans of the connection between productivity and wages.

Am I more productive than her? Surely the chores that she does for a living is something I dare not imagine undertaking myself. What made me so special in comparison to her such that I am earning so much more than her? I sit at my desk plodding away on my keyboard every day, swapping contracts at a macro level. Is this what we mean by being productive?

Singapore is not a pin-making factory in Adam Smith’s hypothetical world, it is a country. While we try to remain competitive in the global village, we have created too much social division in this nation. It is saddening to see our labour movement subscribe to bare naked economics plucked from ‘A’ levels textbooks.

Lim Swee Say’s assertion is not wrong. In the globalised world today, we must try our best to source for the cheapest input (in this case, labour) and maximise the value of our output to remain competitive. Just as critics label Professor Lim’s idea as something which ignores the productivity function, they have also forgotten about the social disparity function which is a serious problem to any country in the world.

In a capitalist society, companies cream off profits from their business ventures on the back of people like Lucy. It is time to redistribute some of these profits back to these people through the most direct way – wages, not handouts.

While Lucy might be benefitting from state-sponsored handouts because of her low income, I hope for the day that she does not find my cup expensive.


Headline illustration courtesy of Hub Pages

______________________________

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

疑电力故障 今早武吉班让轻轨一度停运

今早武吉班让轻轨系统(BPLRT)一度故障,列车停运,有乘客短暂受困。 据民防部队发言人表示,地铁故障后,民防部队连同消防与救护车一同赶往现场协助,但民防部队赶往现场后,发现乘客已改乘其他列车,前往法嘉轻轨站。 据了解SMRT公司的官方脸书专页和推特,未有分享上述故障事故;根据以往经验,如发生地铁故障,民防部队、消防队与救护车服务都会启动,到现场协助乘客。 有乘客反映故障毫无预警,该区居民也是直至8点左右,发现民防部队在附近才得知此事。 另外,在民众发现地铁故障后,也纷纷在各大不同群组中通知欲乘坐的乘客,但由于乘客大量涌入公共巴士,也有网民表示,部分巴士已客满。 去年12月4日,基础建设统筹部长兼交通部长许文远曾指出,SMRT加强维修工程后,武吉班让轻轨已提升至每行驶6万4000公立才出现一次延误。 当时他表示,这比他2015年首次接管该部时,平均每行驶3万3000公里出现一次超过5分钟延误的情况来的好。 武吉班让轻轨系统自1999年开放服务后,就一直面对许多挑战。在2018年1月时,轨道旁一设备被列车撞损后,导致了长达五小时的服务中断。  

Inflated legal costs—all eyes on SMC for now

In recent weeks, there have been a lot written in some blogs…

Air Asia: No free tickets for online survey

Over the past week or so, a survey was spread online via…

杨荣文形容香港如孙悟空 逃不出佛祖手掌心

我国前外交部长杨荣文,昨日出席华侨中学“百年华诞讲座系列”。在演讲后回应一名中国学生对有关香港问题的提问,以《西游记》里的孙悟空形容香港,指孙悟空法力再高强,也翻不出中国这个如来佛的手掌心。 他认为一些港民相信从中国取得自主权的想法并不现实,且必然导向悲剧。 根据香港基本法,自回归以来维持一国两制50年不变框架,杨荣文则认为,接下来应拒绝任何暴力或违法行为,专注探讨2047年之后香港前途问题,以此凝聚共识,解决社会分化问题。 “港人可以不喜欢特首林郑月娥,但这不能改变她是特首的事实。你需要她来解决各种住房、医疗与教育问题。你可以不喜欢她,但必须与她合作,因为中央政府不会允许她辞职。如果真接受辞呈,香港也会变得不可治理。” 上述中国学生是询问杨荣文,何以港人存有抗争精神,但他们的举措无法解决问题。 杨荣文在回应中也指出,香港过去是英殖民地,教育体制中也没鼓励学生心向大陆中国,他说有香港朋友告诉他,当地许多小学和高中,大部分老师都是反中的,要赢得大学选举,立场上也必须反中,这样的思维已根深蒂固。 他指现今香港处在艰难时期,家庭、亲友和党派分裂,但如果能专注在2047年后的发展,就能找到共识。