By Kumaran Pillai

I had to make a quick stopover after lunch to cover the launch of SPP’s Financial Literacy Awareness Programme. I only planned to be there for 30 minutes to grab their standard press release and make a quick exit so that I can have nice Saturday afternoon with my wife and kids. But, fate has it that I spend the next two hours being entertained by a man who was a towering figure in the opposition politics for over two decades, closer to three, actually.

A frail looking See Tong was in top form; he didn’t hold back his punches and kept us entertained with his wit and wisdom on politics and policy matters. He had a prepared text, presumably done by his loyal aides, but he cast that aside to speak straight from his heart instead.

This was one very politicized financial literacy programme and it came with no warning. He spoke about how to cope with the rising costs of living, declining real wages and the rent seeking practices of our government – the things that professors won’t talk about. He gave an example of how the interest rates from the CPF Board have been declining over the years, starting from 6% to the current 2.5% per annum. He also spoke about how the government has been using the CPF monies to finance the GLCs; and about how the government has systematically eroded our personal savings by transferring wealth into our national savings and reserves.

 “The CPF Board has changed the rules,” he said, referring to the opening up of the CPF funds to Unit Trusts investments and bonds. He reckons these policy changes while benefitting the growth of the financial sector and GLCs, puts the average Joe at risk of losing everything. He added that “management of CPF is a complex issue” and therefore people need to be educated.

“When you sign with that plastic card, you sign your money away,” Chaim said. He also pointed out that youngsters today do not have the same values as older Singaporeans and it is hard to survive in a place like Singapore. Although he didn’t put it in so many words, he has to do this to make up for what the PAP has done to the people all these years.

Seated by his side was NCMP Lina Chiam, who spoke at length about the number of bankruptcies in Singapore and the number of cases she has seen in Potong Pasir. She appeared to be very concerned and troubled by the growing number of people who are distressed financially despite Singapore’s stellar economic growth.

TOC contributor Uncle Leong brought up some interesting statistics. In 2006, the average grant per household for Potong Pasir was $113. Whereas, the average grant per household in Aljunied during the same period was $570, which is $457 higher than what was given to the residents of Potong Pasir. He summed up by saying, “You vote for opposition, you will get penalized; you vote for PAP, you get short-changed. There is no benefit there… might as well vote for the opposition.” Leong brought up more interesting statistics, which I’ll leave for our other editors to work on for our future articles.

The press briefing ended ahead of schedule and the Chiams invited me for a kopi siew dai with them. I spent the next hour literally talking politics and yes I asked him the most important question of whether the opposition parties are ready to take over the government. He spoke about two things in particular, the current political sentiments and the need for opposition parties to work together to form a strong alliance. But, he also added that he does not see that happening anytime in the near future and that the opposition will remain fragmented for now. I sensed his frustration when he said, “everybody wants to be his own boss.” With 34 years in opposition politics and 27 years as MP, Chiam certainly knows the terrain well.

Though old and frail, Chiam has not lost his tenacity and resolve; and most importantly he is still able to work his political charm on those around him. 

Kumaran Pillai is the Chief Editor of The Online Citizen.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

焦虑的主人寻猫记 “无论生死只盼回到身边”

最近闹得沸沸扬扬的寻猫报导,无论在社交媒体或是报章上都可以看到,有人或许觉得大惊小怪,但是身为猫咪的主人,焦虑的心情又是几人能体会。明知家中的毛孩子没有做错却要被冤枉带走,寻找多时,只传来了一只失踪一只死亡的消息,让人心力交瘁,而猫咪主人现在只求“Leng Leng回家”。 星期五深夜,这里大多数餐厅和商店几乎关闭的时段,在港湾中心(Harbourfront Centre)外面,新加坡文化遗产节的大荧幕还在放映着,但很多摊位已经准备收摊了。双层巴士正在通往巴士车站的路上,带着疲惫的通勤者回家。在这些喧哗中,一阵装着饼干的塑料容器摇晃声音响起,一名女人沿着这条路走,摇着塑料容器,低头在人行道上绿树成荫的灌木丛中喊道,“Leng Leng!Ah Leng!” 58岁的格蕾丝·陈(译音Grace Tan),过去两周都没放弃寻找Leng Leng,她从位于马林台的住家,一路南下到港湾中心,在行人道徘徊,一遍一遍地检查灌木丛和树丛中,一声一声的呼唤爱猫。 市镇会初时否认抓猫 2019年3月8日,格蕾丝自兼职工作中回到她位于马林台的租屋时,发现她的两只猫Ben Ben和Leng…

刘特佐砸150万新元 请公关公司修复个人形象

根据《纽约时报》报导,受到马来西亚警方通缉的年轻富豪刘特佐,花费超过110万美元(约150万新元),通过两家美国律师楼在全球进行宣传,洗清因一马公司丑闻受损的形象。 负责此行动的两家律师楼分別是Kobre & Kim和Schillings International律师楼,他们在过去7个月中积极展开行动,并通过聘请公关公司等行事。 相关服务包括全天候的危机处理公关回应、塑造网络的搜寻结果、设立网站,专门提供和刊载刘特佐相关新闻、国际报告和法律文件。 《纽约时报》报导指,超过81万8000美元已支付给三家公关公司和一数码搜寻公司,当中有54万4000美元,支付给设立在纽约的公关公司。 报导称,其中一家公关公司是由刘特佐律师之一,詹姆斯哈格迪(James Haggerty)所拥有的PRCG Haggerty。 《纽约时报》是援引美国司法部的法律文件,根据《外国代理人登记法》(Fara)发现,PRCG Haggerty向美国司法部提呈相关委託。…

禁外国买家入住柔佛森林城

根据《彭博社》报导,马国不再允许外国人在柔佛新马发展经济特区—伊斯坎达特区的碧桂园森林城置产。 马国首相敦马斩钉截铁表示,该发展城镇资产将不会卖给外国人,也不会发签证给外国人来居住。 “我们反对是因为这个发展区块是建给外国人,而不是大马人,很多本国人都还没能力买组屋。” 不过,在今午的发布会上,他未有揭露具体如何执行禁止外国人在森林城置产的政策。 这个发展特区距离我国仅两公里,占地面积约有20平方公里,由碧桂园太平洋景公司发展,总投资规模约为一千亿美元。完成后的森林城预计可容纳70万人口。 森林城放眼吸引来自中国、印尼、泰国乃至杜拜的投资者或买家来置产。而马国过去曾推出第二家园计划,希望能吸引富有外国人持长期居留证在马居留。 事实上,自马国政权更迭以来,该计划即面对不确定因素。敦马在选举前曾多方抨击有关计划乃是中资计划,是前首相纳吉典当马国权益给中国的行为。 另一方面,森林城当局则回应彭博社,将进一步要求马国首相澄清上述论述。 在不久前,碧桂园创办人杨国强还曾亲自拜会敦马,并表示该集团将加大在马国投资规模,日后将着重加强现代农业和只能机器制造业的投资力度。

Library Consultative Panel to help review library materials following “Penguingate”

By Howard Lee The National Library Board (NLB) has announced on 15…