~ By Dr Chee Soon Juan ~

The more fearful Singaporeans are, the harder it will be for us to meet the challenges that lie ahead. While progress was made at the last general elections, there is still much fear when it comes to supporting the opposition.The SDP National Healthcare Plan has received many praises. Some of these have come from the establishment, many of whom indicated that the plan is worthy of serious consideration.

Unfortunately, these folks have not come out in public to support it. These individuals and organisations tell us in private that they cannot be seen openly supporting the SDP because of their employment status or the relationship that they are in with the Government.

This is a shame. For the first time in Singapore's history, an opposition party has come up with a healthcare plan that many people find better that the system that is in place. A group of healthcare and medical professionals have put-in much time and effort to study the state of affairs and put together a detailed policy proposal for Singapore.

And yet, many Singaporeans who are in positions of influence shy away from openly endorsing or even discussing it just because it is from an opposition party.

Such a situation makes it tremendously difficult for public opinion to build up and compel the Government to pay attention to the failings of its policies. The ultimate losers are Singaporeans themselves.

Why can't the proposal be discussed on its merits and if one feels so inclined, support it? The fact that it comes from an opposition party should be not be feared but, instead, celebrated because it signals the maturing of politics in Singapore; not to mention, it indicates a real choice at the polling booth in the next general elections.

For years, Singaporeans have lamented that the opposition has not been forthcoming with alternative ideas. When the SDP makes that breakthrough and produces a plan worthy of public support, few dare to do so openly.

Other examples are minimum wage and the Singaporeans First policy. The SDP was the first opposition to come up with such ideas for Singapore. And yet, few dare to openly help the party campaign even though they support such measures. 

Such a situation is reminiscent of the politics of old where fear silenced the entire society. This is not healthy for our nation as we go forward into a future of uncertainty beset by a host of problems that require honest and open debates.

The more fearful Singaporeans are, the harder it will be for us to meet the challenges that lie ahead. While progress was made at the last general elections, there is still much fear when it comes to supporting the opposition.

What can we do to change this? For a start civil society organisations, social-business entities like the Rotary Club, student and alumni organisations, universities, medical groups, hospitals, insurance companies, etc. can organise talks on healthcare and invite the SDP to talk about our plan.

The SDP's Policy Unit, now staffed by professionals knowledgeable in the various fields, will continue to put up credible policy plans over the next several months especially in the areas of the economy, housing and education.

To develop a mature, democratic and open political system, two factors are necessary: The first is a credible opposition party that is well-organised and offers workable alternative policies. The SDP is striving to be that party. The second factor is a people who must not be afraid to actively and openly support the party. On this we ask Singaporeans to do their part.

One without the other is like trying to clap with one hand.

Singapore is at a crucial cross-point. We either fall back to the way we have been for the last few decades and leave politics and policy-making exclusively to the PAP. Or we can claim back our right to speak out and support parties that come up with alternative policies that benefit the people and the country.

_______________

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【武汉冠状病毒】单日增14确诊! 马国累计病例暴增至50例

邻国马来西亚今日(4日)新增14起武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)确诊病例,其中第26例病患,与之有过接触的16人都确诊。 马国卫生总监诺希山指出,第26起确诊病患,曾出席多场活动,而受感染的其他16宗确诊病例,其中一人是他的助理,其他15人曾与第26病患出席同一场或超过一场活动。 共有215人曾与上述病患近接触,其中9人检测结果为阴性,还有180人仍等待检测结果。 马国第26例是52岁的国库控股高管兼城市发展局控股(UDA)董事。 他一月中曾前往中国上海,2月27日出现症状,并于3月1日确诊。 迄今马国治愈病患累计22人。

Ceriph: A birdhouse for words

By Danielle Hong Like many of us, Ivan Ang, 30, understands the…

涉违法选举法令 塔纳通议员资格被“暂停”

泰国宪法法院星期四(5月23日)在该国议会开跑的前一天,一致通过议决,以涉嫌违反选举法令为由,下令暂时撤销受千禧一代欢迎的未来前进党党魁塔纳通的议员资格。 也是前商业大亨的塔纳通在2月份登记竞选该国3月24日举行的大选时,被选委会指控持有一家媒体公司的股份,触犯了选举法令。 塔纳通当时表示这是无中生有的指控,并表示他已经于1月份将有关媒体公司V-Luck Media的股份转让给其母亲了。 宪法法院表示,在确定是否违反选举规则之前,塔纳通必须“暂停”履行议员的指责。 指责军政府阻止他入议会 在法院发布有关命令数小时后,塔纳通在未来前进党总部召开新闻发布会。他在会上指出,即使国会议员职责被暂停,但是他的国会议员地位仍然保持。“虽然我被禁止进入政界,但我将为投票支持我党的630万服务。” 他也表示,他参与首相席位竞选,就是为了阻止军政府,停止独裁统治。 泰国参政者皆被禁止持有媒体公司的股份,以防止出现利益冲突。 宪法法院命令是在泰国议会开幕前夕下达,有关的议会将于星期五,在泰国国王玛哈·哇集拉隆功主持下展开,并且预计将在下周投票选出泰国的新首相。 未来前进党在本届国家大选中取得第三的排名,在议会中赢得80个议席。该党曾矢言要结束军政府的统治,并修改2017年宪法。 上周,塔纳通成功为其政党加入的联盟取得足够的选票,以推翻军政府支持的前首相巴育。…

Japan revises law to ease deportation of failed asylum seekers

Japan passed a controversial immigration law allowing the deportation of failed asylum seekers after three rejections. Critics argue that the new law violates human rights and puts lives at risk. Japan’s low acceptance rate for refugees and scrutiny of immigration detention conditions have been subjects of criticism in recent years. Activists and opposition parties staged protests against the revised law, but the ruling coalition voted it down. The government claims the changes will improve access to medical care and accommodation options for pending asylum seekers. Amnesty International has called for the revision to be scrapped, labeling Japan’s detention policies as harsh and repressive.