~ By Jen ~

At a recent gathering with some Singaporean friends, the discussion inadvertently turned to local politics. But when I mentioned Mr Brown, our famous Singapore blogger, one of my friends asked, “Who?” and the punchline came when another friend answered,”Oh, I know! He’s that anti-Singapore blogger!”

I was flabbergasted and told her that Mr Brown (whom I do not know personally) may be many things including being a funny humorist, amateur actor and avid blogger but he is certainly not anti-Singapore. If anything, I think he has consistently come across as a pretty diehard supporter of Singapore. So how on earth did she get this impression of him? Was it the video spoofs he did of the PAP MPs? Or was it his satirical jokes that failed to tickle her funny bone?

This incident reminded me of the common labels that are being dished out regularly by more conservative Singaporeans (and even some PRs) on locals who dare openly question and criticise the Government and government policies. Often they use the labels “anti-government” and “anti-establishment” to dismiss whatever being said as negative. As for the label “anti-Singapore” it implies a “you are with us or against us” mentality.

Talking down to those speaking up

How did such erroneous thinking and labelling come about? When did speaking up become akin to a treacherous deed against the country?? Is it because, for far too long, Singaporeans have been moulded and raised on a diet of out-of-bound markers (i.e. the infamous term 'OB Markers'), quiet obedience, self-censorship and an apolitical attitude? Have all those lost years – post independence – of never blatantly questioning government policies and the ruling party turned many of us into a people who have lost the fire in our belly? Or worse, lost our ability to evaluate the facts, to think out-of-the-box and to judge fairly?

It flummoxes me when well-educated, intelligent people instantly pigeonhole Singaporeans as being anti-establishment as soon as they criticise or poke fun at the Government. In some ways, it is like the frog in a well. The frog thinks he knows what is best as he has been safe and well-fed staying in the well all this time. He feels threatened by anyone who tries to talk to him about the New World and who shakes his comfort zone. Fair enough, he is entitled to his opinion.

But let’s get it straight once and for all – it is wrong to label people who speak up and question government policies and PAP as being “anti-establishment”, “anti-government” or “anti-Singapore”. Think about it, are the Republicans being anti-establishment when they criticise the Democrats in the US? Are the loyal supporters of Malaysia’s opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim being anti-Malaysia? Of course not! Regardless of their differences, they all love their country with a passion.

Patriotism comes in many forms

We all have different ways of showing love, be it to a loved one or to our country. Some are more reserved while some are more open and expressive and some are downright passionate. Just as we do not label those who don’t speak up as being anti-Singapore, we should not tar and feather vocal citizens who speak with a voice of reason as being anti-anything.

Think about it. It is precisely because we care that we bother to share our views and to speak up for our country.

In most democratic countries it is normal to hold different political views and to freely express them. Opinions are exchanged, ideas will occasionally clash and there will always be some extreme voices on the fringe. But out of this “noise” comes a maturing of the electorate, one that will care even more about what happens to their country. By having a say in our country, we gain pride and ownership and a real sense of belonging. That much desired thing called patriotism is an elusive fire that comes from within us and not because we sing national songs during National Day.

At the end of the day, we should all just realise that we are one people wanting the best for our country. There should be no enemies in the building of Singapore.

“My kind of loyalty was loyalty to one’s country, not to its institutions or its office-holders.” ~ Mark Twain, 1889


Headline photo courtesy of Meanderings & Reflections

This article first appeared on Jentrified Citizen and we thank Jen for allowing us to reproduce it here

_____________________

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

接公平竞赛奖得主刘威延律师函 苏睿勇被要求撤“不实”文章

马拉松健将苏睿勇,接到新加坡国家奥林匹克委员会(SNOC)的律师信函,要求他撤回有关2015年东南亚运动会马拉松赛的一篇文章,并且在4月9日下午5时前作出道歉。惟,苏睿勇透过律师回应拒绝了有关要求。 这篇名为“2015 SEA Games Marathon – In My Words (2015东南亚运动会马拉松赛-就我而言)”的文章,是苏睿勇于2015年6月22日(于2018年更新)在其个人部落恪“RunSohFast”发布。这位两届东南亚运动会马拉松金牌得主,在文章中细说他在4年前赢得首个金牌的经过,其中包括在抵达第一个5公里标记后,出现了意想不到的错误U弯。 他在文中是这样写道: “接下来我预计需要回转,我寻找标志、箭头,或是一些告诉我们要回转的标志。我们看到只有一群赛道裁判员集聚在一起,但是没有发现我们已经快速接近了。我们直接越过他们,并且在他们喊着阻止,“走错了!回来!”时,我们才停下。我们转回来,平衡力发生了变化。原本跑在前方带领大家走上错误路线的领队,现在处于后方,然后追回来前方。到目前为止一直处于最后的队友Ashley(刘威延),现在反而跑在我们前端,只因为我们转错了弯。没有人放慢速度等待,比赛依旧进行着。”…

全球加强措施遏制肺炎疫情 湖北省扩大封城行动

武汉肺炎疫情扩散,单单是中国境内,武汉附近的七个城市就进入了封城行动,而外国如美国和日本等国家的机场都加强了机场检疫程序。 源自河北省的武汉肺炎病例在全球达到830宗,包括越南也证实发现有两起确诊病例,且其中已经有25人死亡。 一名来自沧州市南皮县的80岁男子,日前曾在武汉探亲和居住了两个月,日前被诊断患病,随后成为首宗河北省以外的死亡病例。 中国国家卫生健康委员会数据显示,截止23日24时,中国有27省份通报了259起新病例和8起死亡病例。 至少八城市封城 随着病例增加,封城行动范围也扩大,湖北省内至少八个城市,包括有鄂州、黄冈、赤壁、潜江等都采取了限制交通出入的措施。 湖北疫情防控指挥部也发出通告,除了限制交通流量,也加强人员流动管理,暂停旅游和招商活动。当局同时禁止政党机关、企业单位、武装部队人员取消出差,以及各大专院校至幼儿园都延迟开学。 而武汉市内的文化娱乐场所暂停营业,其他地区的营业场所则加强每日消毒工作,并且测量所有入场人员体温。 中国北京也宣布取消庙会等大型活动,而故宫博物馆也发出公告,为了避免人员聚集,增加感染可能性,将于1月25日起闭馆,至到另行通知。 世卫:未构成国际紧急事件 另一方面,世界卫生组织昨日在日内瓦举行两天会议,认为中国武汉肺炎疫情并未构成国际公共卫生紧急事件。 该组织总干部谭德塞强调,虽然组织会议得出有关结论,但是这不意味着他们就认为情况不严重,且也不排除疫情会成为国际紧急事件的可能性。…

Gov’t should help beef up SMRT’s resources to fix problems: ST correspondent

In an opinion piece in the Straits Times on Thursday, 09 July,…

贸工部预估明年经济增长0.5至2.5巴仙

上月14日,贸工部公布对新加坡第三季经济的初步预估数据,整体国内生产总值(GDP)增长仅0.1巴仙,与第二季度持平。 不过今日该部公布较乐观的GDP预估增长,2019年约为0.5至1巴仙,以及明年为0.5至2.5巴仙。 贸工部称我国经济在第三季度的同比增长达到0.5巴仙,比之前预估的0.1巴仙高。 经季节性调整按环比折年率计算,经济增长2.1巴仙,而第二季度则是负增长2.7巴仙。 制造业受到电子产品影响同比滑落1.7巴仙,惟其他制造领域增长,如生物医学制造领域增长最强劲。 建筑业在公共与私人领域带动下同比增长2.9巴仙;零售领域萎缩3.3巴仙,主要是因为机械、设备和供应等领域,因为电子出口表现而下滑。 至于运输和仓储领域增长持平,比此前2.4巴仙的增长放缓。空运领域则基于空航搭客增长稳健成长。 贸工部预测明年温和增长 贸工部预测2020年,由于新兴市场和发展中经济体增长前景的改善,预计全球增长将出现温和回升。不过新加坡数个关键需求市场,如美国和中国预料仍会放缓。 亚洲方面,中国明年增长预计减速,基于该国进行金融改革以打击影子银行活动,而美国关税仍会对中国出口构成压力;香港等地的地缘性不确定因素亦对周边和新加坡等地溢出负面影响。 该部预测整体上新加坡在明年能取得“温和增长”,特别是电子和精密工程领域有望逐步复苏、数码工艺、金融和保险业务保持健康增长。