~ By Ng Yi Shu ~

The debate with regards to Bukit Brown had raged for close to a year. With LTA’s and MND’s go-ahead on the eight-lane highway and the call for moratorium on the highway gone unheeded, there is nothing the NGOs can do today to stop the destruction of our heritage. But with all honesty, will we remember the our ancestral heritage and culture?

Will we even care? This is a hard question that no one wants to answer, but still, it beseeches an answer. This is not a question about policy nor governance. This is a question about our society, identity and narrative in general. This is a hard question to answer.

It was only the destruction of the old National Library building that sparked the debate to determine which of the two important matters of urban development and heritage preservation was more important in our society. Personally, I am too young to remember the destruction of the old National Theatre, but I do remember as a young boy reading that the government was intending to destroy the old National Library and that some commemorative red bricks from the building would be sold to heritage enthusiasts. In retrospect, I understand why people chose to pay money to purchase a piece of history about to be destroyed – because a picture of a place, though it speaks a thousand words, cannot compare to the experience of a place humans remember.

That is the same reason I took the chance to visit my great-great grandmother’s grave at Bukit Brown. My family is lucky that the grave is a fair distance from the highway and that it would be preserved.

Until the next development comes along.

Fact is, many of us do not remember the past. Many of us chose to forget the stories we have been taught since young: that of the first pioneers of Singapore, what they had built and the traditions they practiced. I am also guilty of the same thing: my understanding of old Chinatown came from a museum trip and a trail around the area. I would have never visited Bukit Brown if I did not know of the personal connection my family and I had of that area.

In my personal opinion, forgetting is not a sin. The circumstances that made us forget were understandable – we were a young country with dreams – dreams that we would be wealthy enough someday. These same dreams took us overseas – to study, to work, or for some, to sightsee. These same dreams brought back other cultures. Our open nature allowed for a melting pot of cultures to happen. Then, technological advancement came, accelerating this melting pot. We yearned for Western modernity. We worked for it. We became wealthy as a nation. In the end, there was neither time nor interest in our heritage or culture.

Then came the great privatisation of our media and the introduction of cable TV. The transformation of the then Singapore Broadcasting Corporation into Mediacorp today was hailed by many back then as a move to increase of broadcasting freedoms. However, a culture of self-censorship ensued. This, coupled with our yearning for other, ‘better’ cultures caused Singaporean media to be overlooked. Affluent viewers purchased alternatives from other countries, which created huge followings – that of JPOP and KPOP.

But, will we remember?

Politically, yes. The Bukit Brown Highway will remain a sore point. Citizens had many concerns – ranging from how the development of Bukit Brown would allow for more foreigners to come here to the environmental and ecological impact. Others took offence to the preservation of SICC and questioned the reasons why the country club for the wealthy was not spared. The decision to build the highway will, to some, represent the indifference the government has towards the people. The controversy will raise into public consciousness the importance of tradition and culture.

But such a negative event should not be the trigger for us Singaporeans to start caring about our roots again. In fact, the onus should be on us to explore, to see and to experience our heritage. Those that have been kept – the Chinatown shophouses, Sri Mariamman Temple, Masjid Jamae… the list goes on. The onus should be on us to maintain the emotional connection we have to our past. It is, after all, our choice to remember; our choice to be rooted; our choice to belong.

_______________________

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Pro-PAP page criticises PSP’s Brad Bowyer for not wearing a mask while walking the grounds

On Thursday (6 August), pro-PAP Facebook page Singapore Matters singled out Progress…

ANA offers expanded halal-certified in-flight menu

ANA offers expanded halal-certified in-flight menu to accommodate the airline’s increasingly diverse customer base

MOM rejects TOCA’s application to cancel POFMA correction direction on videos related to Paul Tambyah comments on its advisory to employers

Minister Josephine Teo has rejected The Online Citizen Asia’s (TOCA) application to…

我国骨痛热症稍有下降 渔港逾20工友相继染病

我国骨痛热症病例虽然在上周有下滑的迹象,自8月9日至15日共累积了1341起病例,但是在裕廊渔港就出现了五个黑斑蚊滋生地点,且一个月内有超过20名工友相继染病。 国家环境局的文告显示,第33周的骨痛热症累积了1341起新病例,比起第32周的1668起新病例少了327起,但是仍然维持在四位数。 然而,当局在裕廊渔港发现了五个黑斑蚊滋生处,包括在水沟、水桶盖和帆布下,而该区一个月内也有逾20名工友相继染上骨痛热症,他们多为居住在渔港临时住宿的马来西亚籍员工。 对此,环境局将对相关单位采取对付行动,而新加坡食品局也加强了灭蚊措施。 据悉,这些染病工友中,有者甚至被感染了两三次,而且他们都是受到两国防疫措施影响而被迫留在本地,并获得当局批准,在渔港的临时住宿居住。 新加坡鱼商总会指出,在陆续传出病例后,渔港的喷雾次数已经有所增加,从原本的每月一次改为每周一次。商会指出,当地居民都有在保持卫生,但是黑斑蚊滋生或受到天气影响,而变得比较快。因 据环境局数据显示,渔港路和惹兰德榜截至上周五,已经累积了29起骨痛热症病例,其中最近两周就有11起病例。 当局致力于减少蚊虫滋生地,然而截至上周,我国骨痛热症病例已经累积超过2万5000起。 因此当局除了加强和市镇理事会的合作,也敦促民众,尤其是居住在蚊症黑区的民众采取三项保护措施,即在家中黑暗部位喷洒杀虫剂、常常使用驱虫剂,以及穿长袖衣和长裤。 此外,当局也发布了两个教育短片,指导民众如何在家中喷洒杀虫剂,以及住在蚊症黑区的居民,若独自在家中看到蚊子,该采取的措施。