~By: Ng Yi Shu and additional reporting by Ravi Philemon~

A recent report [1] has again highlighted the apparent poor corporate governance in the Media development Authority of Singapore (MDA).

The media report states that MDA is suing RGM Group (an Australian talent management company) for multiple breaches of contract. MDA is trying to recover $27.5 million from RGM, which it had disbursed over four separate agreements between 2006 and 2010.

A TOC reader commenting on MDA's attempt to recover $27.5 million from RGM on his Facebook says, " wow – seriously MDA, you pumped in this much to attract a foreign media company only to get screwed over by them, yet neglect your own homegrown talent. i don't know about you but in most other civilized countries i know, it's called DISCRIMINATION."

Filmmaker Martyn See commenting on what MDA has described as multiple breaches of contract by RGM says, " Could have made 20 lcoal feature films with that money, and generated jobs for people in the industry."

The apparent lack of proper corporate governance is not new to MDA. In 2007, MDA had handed out up to $50,000 each to four interactive digital media start-ups that were co-owned by mentors, despite the scheme's guideline specifically prohibiting start-ups owned by mentors to be ineligible for such grants.

An expert appointed by MDA to evaluate such grant application was also found to have a stake in of the start-ups, and was also a business partner of a mentor of nine other grant-receiving start-ups.

In 2009, the Auditor-General's Office (AGO) rapped MDA for these lapses.[2]  The AGO also criticised the Media Development Authority of Singapore for failing  to collect an estimated S$9.89 million in revenue from joint projects with production companies, despite the projects being completed for some time. [3].

In 2010, MDA was taken to task by Public Accounts Committee for having the most number of lapses in the way they had managed their finances. In commenting that MDA's lapses "reflect poorly on the overall internal controls of the MDA". the Committee recommended that the Auditor-General's Office consider reviewing MDA's governance and controls in two to three years’ time, instead of the usual once in seven years.[4]


[1]  http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_785495.html

 
 
 
 
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

王瑞杰访港会林郑月娥 重申两地良好关系

新加坡副总理王瑞杰于昨日(5月29日)到访香港,与香港特区行政长官林郑月娥会面,重申狮城香港良好关系,并讨论在现有和一些新领域深化合作。 王瑞杰称狮城和香港相互享有共同利益,也在教育和金融等领域良好合作。 王瑞杰和林郑月娥也商讨如何在粤港澳大湾区(Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area (GBA))和一带一路倡议上,加强合作。 林郑月娥也感谢新加坡在香港-东南亚的合作上给与支持,并相信透过香港特区政府在新加坡、雅加达和曼谷设立的经济与贸易办事处配合下,香港与东盟关系可进一步加强,迈向全新阶段。 同时出席者包括新加坡外交部长维文医生和贸工部兼教育部高级政务部长徐芳达。 根据香港紫荆网报导,林郑月娥说,香港和新加坡在人文和经贸的关系一向十分密切,两地的背景和发展有不少相近之处,亦同样为世界最具竞争力的经济体,可以互相借镜的地方很多。 她说香港致力发展创新科技,已大力投入资源和推出多项具体措施,期望与新加坡的科研机构、院校和企业在生物科技、金融科技和初创等范畴开拓更多合作空间。…

School safety requires a “collective role”; MOE does not want to risk engendering “siege mentality”: Chan Chun Sing

Since the tragic alleged murder of a 13-year-old student by a fellow…

Singapore businesses embrace digital tax payments spearheaded by DBS, IRAS

Based on the reports on Monday (17 Feb), Singapore announced that 20…

审计署点名三部门、八法定机构 出现疏漏

审计署发表的2019/2020财政年度审计长报告中 ,称多达三个部门、八个法定机构出现IT监管、采购和合约管理、运作管理,以及商业津贴项目管理等方面疏漏。 这三个部门包括:财政部的会计署、总理公署的公共服务部和外交部。 八个法定部门包括:国家图书馆局;教育部旗下的义安理工学院、共和国理工学院;环境与水源部旗下的公共事业局、贸工部旗下的裕廊集团、总理公署旗下的政府科技局;人力部劳动力发展局(Workforce);和贸工部企业发展局等等。 其中,国家图书馆局被揭发,旗下国家档案馆翻新计划,75项合同变动(contract variation),有近半都未有给出预估成本就获得原则上同意(in-principle approvals (IPAs)),缺乏审核官员的监督。 审计署在审计裕廊集团帐目时,发现有收据造假和投标商报价造假,该集团已报警处理。 财政部会计署 审计署发现,会计署PaC@Gov最重要的操作系统,供应商可以在不需密码情况下就登入;审核流程也不健全,无法侦测到未经授权的使用。这意味着该部的电脑资讯管理有待加强。 公共服务部…