~ By Gordon Lee ~

In 2005, it was reported that Singapore’s authorities “have learned a hard lesson after Britain's prestigious Warwick University snubbed the city-state with its decision not to accept an invitation to establish a campus." [1]

This is my University, and I am proud of this decision.

How has this embarrassing event provided lessons for Yale-NUS several years on?

Clash of values

Warwick University was one of two universities shortlisted and invited to establish Singapore first foreign full-scale campus.

As a research University, Warwick was obviously concerned about academic freedom for its professors and students. However, it was very clear that this is lacking in Singapore. NUS Law Prof Thio Li-ann advised Warwick that “the government will intervene if academic reports cast a negative light on their policies. [2]

The Singapore authorities required “international educational institutions operating in the city-state to agree not to conduct activities seen as interference in domestic affairs”. But when Warwick “sought guarantees that staff and students would not be punished by the Singapore government for making academic-related comments that might be seen ‘as being outside the boundaries of political debate’”, the EDB (the authorities responsible) refused to comment. [3]

Yale University believes the guarantee that their staff and students “will be free to conduct scholarship and research and publish the results, and to teach in the classroom and express themselves on campus, bearing in mind the need to act in accordance with accepted scholarly and professional standards and the regulations of the college.”[4] I think they are deluded, and recklessly sacrificing precious academic freedom and reputation for a new college thousands of miles away in a repressive city state. One wonders what Yale gains from the venture?

Embarrassment to the authorities

The other university that was shortlisted in 2005 – the University of New South Wales – shut just two months after its “grand” opening, which was again a slap in the face of the Singapore authorities.[5]

It is no doubt that the Singapore authorities are extra-cautious this time around to prevent another humiliating affair.

This time around, right as Yale-NUS is in the midst of making faculty offers, the Yale faculty has very recently voted for a resolution which begins by raising concerns over a “history of lack of respect for civil and political rights” in Singapore, as well as urging “Yale-NUS ‘to respect, protect and further’ non-discrimination and civil liberty, and states that these values comprise the core of a liberal arts education.”[6] The tempered language of the resolution has helped to avert an otherwise embarrassing fallout that would likely further tarnish the authorities’ scandal-ridden record of attempting to attract top foreign universities. However, the faculty having made clear their views on “Yale values”, have only raised the stakes for the Singapore authorities.

The “problem” of transparency

Warwick’s faculty senate (of senior lecturers) voted overwhelmingly (27-13) against the establishment of the Singapore campus.[7] Even though this vote was not binding, it placed immense pressure on the final decision of the University council (which was keen on the Singapore campus). As mentioned earlier, Warwick even commissioned a feasibility study by NUS Prof Thio Li-ann, and the report was openly published.

As a parallel, it appears that Yale wants the campus (having gone this far with the project), even though many staff and students oppose the plans.

It is no wonder that Yale has reportedly not been forthcoming about some of its Trustees past important positions in GIC and Temasek Holdings, including Ho Ching’s “successor” Charles Goodyear.[8] As a fortunate coincidence, Yale does not have a faculty senate – which is probably why the faculty has taken till now to vote on the issue, after having “to suspend the rules of the meetings to introduce and debate the resolution” regarding the Yale-NUS venture.[9]

Only time will tell whether Yale-NUS proves to be a success for Yale, NUS, and the embattled Singapore authorities. Or.. it might be a nail in the coffin of Singapore’s ambition to be an “education hub”, or the ridiculously termed “hub of hubs”.

____________________________

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SIA fined S$112 million for allegedly being part of price–fixing cartel

The European Commission (EC) has re-adopted a cartel decision against 11 air…

Fourth train service disruption on the NSL in 2 weeks

By FAILRAIL.sg There have been 5 service disruptions on the North-South Line (NSL)…

环境局称致力打击骨痛热症,病例由666起下降至303起

骨痛热症近来在我国肆虐,因此也致力于打击骨痛热症。根据环境局9月25日所公布的调查结果显示,我国每个星期的骨痛热症病例,已经从最高峰时期的666起,减少到303起;骨痛热症黑区也从7月份的182个,下降到89个。 环境局表示,我国今年共接获1万2108起骨痛热症案件(截至本月21日),尽管许多骨痛热症黑区已被消灭,但仍可在部分地区发现范围较广的骨痛热症黑区,例如蔡厝港大道2号(Choa Chu Kang Ave 2)、友诺路(Jalan Eunos)、宏茂桥大道3号(Ang Mo Kio Ave 3)、碧山街11号(Bishan St…

纪念建成150年 总统府将首次开放至夜间供民众参观

我国总统府昨日(12日)发文表示,为纪念总统府建立150周年,将在纪念150周年活动期间,首次开放至晚间供民众参观。 目前,总统府每年在五个公共假日会开放让公众参观,但参观时段仅限于白天。 而150周年活动将于10月6日举办,由总统哈丽玛与夫婿阿都拉揭幕。期间也将会安排各项活动,其中最引人注目的是在总统府主要楼宇的幕墙上投射灯光秀,描写总统府的历史与文物。 另外,150周年庆活动也邀请了诸位本地著名表演者如53A、词曲创作人曹思平、马国殿堂级歌后Rahimah Rahim、本地人声乐团麦克疯(MICappella)、我国著名交响乐团(Singapore Symphony Orchestra)为活动表演,增添热闹气息,一同欢庆150周年。 门票将于今日早上10点在总统府官网开卖,票价可分为12新元(本国人与永久居留者);20新元(非本国人),所有收益将全额捐献给“总统挑战”作慈善用途。 访客可选择在三个表演时段:晚上8点15分、晚上8点45分以及晚上9点15分入场。 新加坡总统府于1869年10月8日竣工,是我国历史最悠久的建筑物之一。 为了纪念重要的150周年,总统府已在今年年初开始筹划各项活动,包括“我们的宫殿:生活博物馆展览(the Our…