~ By Joel Hilliker ~

Many see it as harmless fun. An enormous number of people stupidly view it as a sound investment. In fact, a lottery is a scam that creates far more problems than it is purported to solve.

Why? Because it is fundamentally, profoundly immoral. On one side of the exchange is someone seeking to get something for nothing. On the other side is a government enriching itself by preying on its citizens’ human frailties, heedless of the damage it is causing the people it is meant to serve.

Still, it is big business, and growing. Last year, Americans spent $56 billion on lotteries. More Americans play the lottery than regularly attend church.

Get this: One in five Americans say winning the lottery is the most practical way to amass wealth, according to a survey by the Consumer Federation of America and the Financial Planning Association. Not working hard, or saving, or investing soundly, or contributing a useful product or service to the free market. The most practical means to gain wealth is to throw money into a giant whirlpool of impossiblility and cross your fingers.

Among poorer Americans, this delusion is even more pervasive. A full 40 percent of people making under $25,000 a year believe the lottery is their best hope of financial security.

Behold this regrettable manifestation of a whole pack of lies commonly promoted and believed in America today: that honest work is a curse and idleness a blessing; that happiness comes from materialism; that luxuries are a birthright; that wealth redistribution is only fair; that dreams of fame and fortune can come true, no matter the odds; that it is more blessed to receive than to give.

Institutionalised Gimmick

Nevertheless, lottery authorities are more than willing to help these fools part with their money. They try to wash their hands of any guilt by recommending that people play “only for fun,” and only with money they can spare. But they’re kidding themselves: They know full well that their biggest customers are lower-income folks.

They don’t care, though. They need the cash. In a tough economic climate, where indebted state and local governments face rising costs, dwindling revenue and unprecedented cuts, more and more are turning to gambling for a quick fix. That’s why you’ve seen casinos suddenly popping up in nearly every state in the union. And it’s why lotteries are more and more common. What our grandparents would have frowned on is now heavily promoted by authorities, usually in broadly accepted terms – as the solution to shortfalls in education funding, for example. Today, 43 states have lotteries; 27 of them earmark lottery money for education.

Viewed in the extreme short term and without respect to morality, it’s a boon. Generally, administrative costs and payouts to winners only take 75 percent of lottery revenue – and even the prize money is heavily taxed – leaving a handsome cut for the state or city to spend as it pleases. In 2010, states collected an average of $58 per person from their lottery programs; Delaware brought in $370 per person. In last week’s Mega Millions, the 42 states that sold the tickets and pooled their grand prize will collect 44 percent of the revenue – a cool $660 million. The three states where winning tickets were bought will also, of course, tax the winnings.

Put simply, lotteries are a tax on the people who can least afford it. Set aside the investigations that show how little of the money actually ends up getting used for the big-hearted purposes for which lotteries are publicly advertised. Cities and states are extracting a disproportionate percentage of these dollars from families that, really, have no business throwing money away. The same hard times that are hitting governments are also pounding the families sinking their bucks into Mega Millions and Powerball.

Not Worth the Cost

In one sense it is pitiable, and in another sense criminal, that at the same time we are witnessing rising unemployment, climbing costs of living and record debt, we are also seeing soaring lottery ticket sales.

The short-term revenue boost for states from lotteries and casinos carries steep long-term costs, including further impoverishing the poor; sucking money out of local economies that could have gone toward more productive activity; and fueling gambling addiction that leads to other social pathologies. America already has an estimated 15 million problem gamblers—people for whom life can quickly turn into a nightmare of debt, bad checks, bookies and loan sharks, embezzlement, broken homes, wrecked lives. On top of that, casinos in particular tend to be magnets for other evils like prostitution, drug trafficking and organized crime.

The fruits are bad all around. Even the tiny few who actually win the lottery usually end up the worse for it. Studies have shown that 90 percent of them blow all their winnings within five years. “In the process, they will see family and friendships destroyed and the financial security they hoped for disappear,” said financial adviser Daryl LePage. Winners often become victims—of scams, bad investment advice, never-ending solicitation, or libel and slander lawsuits. Many experience bankruptcy, a surge in family problems, and divorce.


This is an excerpt of an article first published on thetrumpet.com

Headline photo courtesy of bills.com

___________________

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Khaw Boon Wan: Bus contracting model may result in bus fares hikes

Bus contracting model which will take effect on 1 September 2016 may…

Netizen slams Straits Times for its "Team Singapore Report Card" for athletes in SEA games 2019

Calling out Straits Times for the “Team Singapore Report Card” published in…

对假消息和公共利益定义过于广泛 《新叙事》忧“泼马”阻吓异议和批评

本月13日,律政部长援引《防止网络假消息和网络操纵法令》,向历史学者兼《新叙事》总监覃炳鑫博士发出更正指示。 根据《防假消息法》办公处文告,当局认为覃炳鑫在本月8日发布在Youtube的视频,对于《防假消息法》含有不实声明。 对此,《新叙事》昨日发声明回应,表示他们会遵守有关指示,但仍会透过合适管道进行上诉。 不过,他们欣慰政府的声明作出两项说明,即《防假消息法》仅针对虚假事实陈述(第2(2)条文),不适用于意见观点。 “批评属于意见,不是事实陈述,也不在《防假消息法》的范围内。基于事实的批判也不受该法约束。” 对此,《新叙事》反驳,诚如视频中所言,他们认为《防假消息法》对所谓假消息和公共利益的定义过于广泛,理论上,这使得对新加坡政府所有的批评,似乎都可能被认为是“虚假的”。 “尽管政府再三保证能容纳批评,遗憾的是我们难以置信。” 该社认为,更正指示似乎在阻吓独立媒体,对公民当中和异议者制造恐惧,故此谴责《防假消息法》实为不公正、不民主的法律,故此呼吁民众共同检讨之。 同时,他们也欢迎内政兼律政部长尚穆根,针对此事进行辩论。

穿凉鞋事件被批双重标准 星耀樟宜称员工疏忽

星耀樟宜被质疑以双重标准待客,一名母亲表示其儿子曾因为穿着凉鞋而被拒绝进入“雪道”景点,却有名人之子穿着凉鞋入场拍照,申诉不满。惟被指名人的本地DJ林佩芬澄清,并没有获得特殊待遇,而星耀樟宜也表示是“工作人员疏忽”,不持任何双重标准。 网民Kailin Ng,于本月3日在脸书上帖文指出,她日前和儿子艾登(Aden)到星耀樟宜星空花园(Canopy Park)的“雪道”(Snow Walk)景点游玩时,本想让孩子看看《冰雪奇缘》中的雪道景点,但是却发现该景点有限制,仅允许穿包鞋的访客入内使用,因此无法进入设施内。 然而数天后,Kailin却在社交媒体上看见本地著名电台主持人林佩芬分享了和孩子一起在“雪道”景点游玩的照片,惊见照片中的小男孩穿着凉鞋,而主持人则在凉鞋外套上鞋套,因此质疑当局在待客方面持有双标准。 Kailin的帖文立刻引起网民的关注,纷纷为她“打抱不平”。 面对有关指控,星耀樟宜和主持人都发言否认。 星耀樟宜:员工疏忽 星耀樟宜接受《8视界》询问时曾表示,当局的首要认为是确保访客能在最佳条件下享用设施,因此才会有要求访客穿上包鞋才能进入的限制。 “出现访客穿着凉鞋就进入雪道场景事件,则是工作人员的疏忽,已经提醒相关工作人员,要确保访客穿着符合规定的鞋子才能进入景点。” 星耀樟宜也表示已经让客户中心和Kailin联系,邀请他们母子在到访星耀樟宜。…