Yong Vui Kong’s third appeal application against his death sentence was rejected on 4 April. Only an act of clemency from the President of Singapore can stop his execution from going ahead. Yong Vui Kong has already spent over four years on death row.

In January, Yong Vui Kong’s lawyer submitted an appeal application stating that Yong Vui Kong should not be executed due to unequal treatment by the Attorney-General’s Chambers. This is because while Yong Vui Kong has been sentenced to death, the 26 charges brought by the Attorney-General’s chambers against his boss, a Singaporean alleged to have masterminded the crime, have been withdrawn.

In the court ruling on 4 April, Chief Justice Chan Sek Keong stated that the appeal was rejected because “it has absolutely no merit on the law and on the facts”. The ruling said that the appeal contained “mere assertions” and some were “contrary to evidence”.

This was the third appeal for Yong Vui Kong which has been rejected. The previous appeal applications focused on challenging the constitutionality of the mandatory death penalty for drug trafficking and seeking judicial review of the clemency process.

Yong Vui Kong was only 19 when he was arrested for trafficking 47 grams of heroin into Singapore. Under Singapore's drug laws, a defendant is automatically presumed guilty of drug trafficking in cases where possession of heroin exceeds two grams. This provision violates the defendant’s right to be presumed innocent of a crime until proven guilty. In Singapore, the death penalty is mandatory for trafficking more than 30 grams of heroin. Yong Vui Kong’s last hope is clemency from the President of Singapore, who can grant this only on the advice from the Cabinet. Clemency for a death sentence in Singapore has only been granted six times since independence in 1965.

Official government figures state that there were four executions in 2011, two of them for drug-related offences. Between 2004 and 2010, at least 26 Singaporeans and 12 foreigners were hanged.

Please write immediately in English or your own language:

  • Call on the Singaporean authorities to stop the execution of Yong Vui Kong
  • Demand that they suspend all executions and the imposition new death sentences, and commute all death sentences as a step towards total abolition of the death penalty
  • Call on them to revoke legislation establishing mandatory death sentences

PLEASE SEND APPEALS BEFORE 17 MAY 2012 TO:
President of Singapore
His Excellency Dr. Tony Tan Keng Yam
Office of the President
Orchard Road, Singapore 238823        
Email: istana_general_office@istana.gov.sg
Or fill-in the comment form at the President’s office
via:  
http://www.istana.gov.sg/content/istana/feedback.html 

Foreign Minister of Malaysia
His Excellency Datuk Seri Anifah Amam
Ministry of Foreign Affairs        
Wisma Putra No.1 Jalan Wisam Putra, Precinct 2
62602 Putrajuya, Malaysia        

Fax: +60 3 8889 1717


This circular was sent out worldwide yesterday evening by Amnesty International

____________________________________

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

救济食品不应为了送而送 志工吁应先了解弱势老人状况

当你看见独居高龄老人时,是否会想向他们伸出援手?而民以食为天,一般会想到的方式就是为他们解决三餐,不让他们挨饿,所以会送上许多佐料和食材,希望他们不用出门也可以填饱肚子。但,你是否想过这真的是他们所需要的吗? “让希望活下去”(Keeping Hope Alive)志愿组织于周三(28日)在脸书上呼吁,民众勿将食材和佐料随意送往独居老人。 该组织创办人潘迎芬分享,有一名80岁左右的独居老人,家中堆满无数的包装食品与佐料。根据老人表示,这些食物都是由别人捐送,但他其实并不会下厨。 “想象你在一名80岁老人住处里看见无数食物与佐料。这些都是民众“捐送”给他,问题是老人无法下厨!“,志工表示。 志工随后要大家反思捐送的意义,是真的为了满足对方所需,还是仅仅为了安抚自己的内心?他在文内最后也表示,只有送出别人真正需要的东西,付出才会显得更有价值。 她说,“请想想我们真的是为了给出对方所需要的东西吗?还是仅仅为了安抚自己,认为自己正在做一件善事?付出是一门艺术与智慧的体现。请给出对方所需的,而不是我们想要,付出才会显得更有意义。 潘迎芬想表达的,并不是赠送食物是错误的行为,而是在赠送前需想清楚对方的需求。许多独居老人可能年纪渐长的关系,活动力早已大不如前。对他们而言,可能简单的起身或蹲下都相当困难。 如同潘迎芬曾在帖文内分享另一例子:他们在帮助一名90岁老人收拾住处时发现一些腐烂的食物,经询问后发现,老人其实很爱料理食物,但由于年纪渐长,活动力较差而无法自己动手,才会很少下厨。 帖文上传后,引起网友的关注,网友纷纷赞同志工的想法,认为要帮助人首先要了解其需求,而不是给出自己所想,这样才显得有意义。 网友Karen…

政府一再宣称制造各种就业机会 郑国明:听听就好

政府一再宣称将为国人制造许多就业机会,对此,人民之声党影子内阁成员郑国明(Cheang Kok Ming)质疑,政府鲜少对他们宣布的数据和估计的就业机会进行跟进,只有到那个时候,才能真正证明他们是否履行承诺,所以倒不妨“听听就好”,看他们是否坐言起行。 他举例,今年4月报导,圣淘沙名胜世界和滨海湾金沙将投入约90亿元,拓展赌场以外的设施,并预计创造多达5000份新工作。 “两家名胜宣称雇佣约两万名雇员,其中有65巴仙为本地人。”不过,郑国明反问,本地人也可能涵括永久居民,扣除永久居民后,恐怕真正的新加坡公民雇员占数不多。 此外,政府放眼在产业转型蓝图(Industry Transformation Maps)之下,每年创造5500个专业人士、经理、高管和技术人员(简称PMET)就业机会;榜莪数码园区2023年完成后,估计能创造约2万8000个就业机会;人力部长杨莉明,2017年时任交通部高级政务部长时,曾指出到2025年,海事和航空领域料能创造创造1万3000个就业机会。 以及,铁路行业到2030年将需要1万5000名专才。 郑国明认为,政府罗列出许多就业机会前景,如果将来都能实现且让国人受益,那当然再好不过。 但他也质疑,问题在于我们很难知道结果,因为政府很少会对这些就业的实际状况进行跟进,是否和过去展现的估计相符。 “所以最好还是对这些宣布“半信半疑(take…

Ong Ye Kung: Singapore's drop in ranking in world-talent ranking because percentage GDP spent on education dropped

The main reason why Singapore drop in ranking in the latest world-talent ranking…

DPP in Parti’s case used to join perm sec dad in expensive French cooking escapade in Paris

It was reported yesterday that Liew Mun Leong’s former maid, Parti Liyani,…