~ By Dr James Gomez ~

Although civil society  engagement with ASEAN has deepened over the years, its governments are still reluctant  to fully embrace the region’s diverse people’s movement, opting for “selective” engagement.

This was evident from  the civil society event held from 29-31 March in Phnom Penh to mark Cambodia’s chairmanship of ASEAN in 2012 and the ASEAN summit.

This year the ASEAN Civil Society Conference/ ASEAN People’s Forum (ACSC/APF) – an annual regional platform by civil society groups to debate ideas, formulate proposals for ASEAN, exchange experiences and undertake joint actions in the region – did not receive a warm welcome.

Instead, this year, four workshops organized by the ACSC/APF were forced to move from their main venue at the Lucky Star Hotel when the venue owners under pressure from the authorities did not allow these workshops to take place.

Three of the workshops dealt with land rights, evictions and environments issues and the fourth focused on Burma’s current political and human rights situation and the challenges posed to the country’s chairmanship of ASEAN in 2014.

Instead, there was confusion this year as the Cambodian government chose to recognize a government supported NGO meeting that saw participation by CONGOs and its representativesfrom the different ASEAN countries.

ACSC/APF started in 2005 during Malaysia’s chairmanship of ASEAN and has since been held in the Philippines in 2006, Singapore in 2007, Thailand in 2009, Vietnam in 2010 and Indonesia in 2011. The next summits in 2013 will be held in Brunei and in 2014in Myanmar.

The lesson drawn from this year’s ACSC/APF meeting is that ASEAN governments are practicing selective engagement with “approved” civil society groups.

Hence, if the Cambodian authorities pressured some of this year’s activities, it remains to be seen what will happen when Brunei and Myanmar host the ASEAN summits in 2013 and 2014.

Far from transforming ASEAN into a people-centered community, actions of certain ASEAN governments instead centre on interrupting the voice of the ASEAN people.

Such action shows up the continuous risk that the role of civil society will be “dumbed down” by ASEAN states, especially in areas pertaining to human rights.

Singapore’s delegation this year to the ACSC/APF was made up of representatives from MARUAH, Singaporeans For Democracy and Think Centre.


Dr. James Gomez spoke on the topic of “Three ASEAN Blueprints (Economic,Political-Security, Socio-Cultural Cooperation) – Human Rights Perspectives on the Implementation of the Blueprints” at the ASEAN Civil SocietyConference/ASEAN People’s Forum (ACSC/APF) 2012

______________________

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

New Biogas demonstration plant to be unveiled in Singapore this September

A new biogas demonstration plant to be unveiled in Singapore this September…

不仅惩戒 毕丹星:法律有责任助罪犯重新融入社会

对于触法行为,许多人的反应往往是负面的。工人党秘书长、阿裕尼集选区议员毕丹星,提醒我们对于一些事件只知片面,看到别人自私行为固然令人气愤,但不应再让网络言语偏见、自大,也不应主张以暴制暴,把事情越闹越大。 在阻断措施期间,出现一些未有充分理由、拒绝戴口罩的违例事件。这些人都会接到罚单,而辱骂、对执法人员动粗,都可想而知会遭提控。 不过,毕丹星提醒,法律存在的意义,“不单只是处罚犯人,它也有责任让罪犯在受处罚后,可以重新融入社会。” 潜在心理问题 在新加坡,甚至在世界上的任何一个社会里,总有一群人身上或许有着潜在的心理问题,这也可能解释为什么他们对明明是非法的事情,却知法犯法。 2010年,国会通过刑事程序法典法案(Criminal Procedure Code Bill),法案允许法庭可发出强制性治疗令。法庭判决的处罚,可考虑让有心理问题的被告,接受强制性的心理治疗,以代替监禁。 上述法律在2018年扩大,工人党当时也支持这个做法。 毕丹星在脸书贴文指出,在判处强制性治疗令之前,法官必须要求提呈一份强制性治疗报告,报告必须由卫生部指定的心理医生准备。 被告也必须符合以下几点:…

M’sia media says SG rejected request to build HSR stop at KLIA cause SG sees move as threat

It was reported yesterday that a Malaysian media, The Malaysian Insight, has…

Give up your seat – TOC takes to Speakers’ Corner

the following is a media release by TOC: There have been many…