~ By C C Y ~

Central to the discussion surrounding the maintenance of Bukit Brown in its unspoilt state is the question of how to best use space in Singapore, particularly one that is not high-rise steel and concrete. Skeptics of maintaining Bukit Brown in its natural condition argue that the land can be put to better use. Such positions clearly underplay the fact that a green Bukit Brown benefits Singapore by retaining rainwater, lowering ambient temperature, and preserving biodiversity. Bukit Brown does so much better than the twenty-two golf courses that take up 2.2 percent of our land and 88 percent of all recreational space in Singapore ever can.[1]

But leaving aside environmental issues for a moment, I believe that conserving Bukit Brown can serve to celebrate and promote Singapore to both Singaporeans and visitors alike. A Bukit Brown in its natural glory can connect Singaporeans to the spirit that shaped who we are as a nation and introduce visitors to a Singapore that is much more than simply steel-reinforced concrete, asphalt, and glass. Of course, many may wonder who in their right mind would visit a cemetery. Here, I would like to suggest that having a cemetery as a major site of historical — and potentially tourist — interest is very common internationally, even in cities that otherwise clamour for space.

Strong precedent to preserve cemeteries

Just north of the causeway, Malacca is proud of its Bukit Cina and Penang, its Jewish and Protestant cemeteries, just as Tokyo openly extols its Aoyama and Yanaka cemeteries. Few would think to destroy the catacombs in Rome or Paris, just as most would not consider constructing roads through and buildings over Pere-Lachaise, Montparnasse, Montmatre, Brompton, Highgate, or Kensal Green. Los Angeles has Hollywood Forever Cemetery, New Orleans has Lafayette and St. Louis, while New York City keeps Marble Cemetery, Trinity Church Cemetery, and the African Burial Ground National Monument on Manhattan. Even land-starved Hong Kong Island has its Happy Valley Cemetery and Stanley Military Cemetery. The list can go on and on.

Pere-Lachaise Cemetery in Paris
 

Lafayette Cemetery in New Orleans

These spaces help define the urban and social landscape in which they belong, and help shape the character of their cities. Locals go to these cemeteries for walks and to physically connect with the past, children visit these places as part of school tours to learn about where their cities and even countries came from. Visitors from out of town make special effort to see these cemeteries because they are an indelible part of the experience of visiting these cities. From “Interview with a Vampire” to “Easy Rider” and “The Da Vinci Code”, many of these cemeteries have been immortalised on the silver screen. Aoyama Cemetery is even a traditional location for Japanese families to picnic and view the cherry blossoms each spring.

Aoyama Cemetery in Tokyo
 

Inside of Pere-Lachaise Cemetery, Paris
 

Land price argument is flawed

If prices are an indicator of the relative scarcity of land, then many of the cities mentioned earlier have as much a concern for the availability of space as Singapore, if not more. According to the credit-/debt analysis firm Credit Sesame, land in Singapore cost an average of US$1,561 per square foot as of 2011.[2] This is less than the US$3,287 per square foot in Paris and the US$1,590 per square foot in London, but more than the US$1,090 in New York City for the same year. The same study lists a square foot in the middle income Taikoo Shing area in Hong Kong as going for US$1,118. In comparison, average land prices in Tokyo stood at US$2,080 per square foot in 2008, the year of the Global Financial Crisis.[3] In none of these other urban areas were there calls to pave over their historic cemeteries.

Offering a cheaper attraction

That Singapore is able to spend substantial funds on creating spaces for recreation strongly suggests that we can well afford Bukit Brown. Gardens-by-the-Bay cost S$800 million to construct, while Marina Bay Sands took S$8 billion to erect and Resorts World Singapore, S$6.59 billion.[4] The collection from the Belitung Shipwreck came at a price of US$32 million.[5] The purchase and exhibition of a dinosaur family from the United States by the Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research has a tag of at least S$46 million.[6] Bukit Brown may prove no less an attraction for visitors than these other locations. It can even offer a more accommodating and affordable to place visit as an open, public space.

Has a unique selling point

Among Bukit Brown’s draws is the fact that it is one of the largest Chinese burial grounds in the world outside China. It is unique in featuring Overseas Chinese, including members of Sun Yat-sen’s Tongmenghui and prominent individuals in the modern history of Southeast Asia. The intricate tomb designs found at Bukit Brown are particular to this part of the world. Bukit Brown also includes the communal graves of many who perished during the Second World War and the Japanese Occupation, possibly including some killed during the Japanese Imperial Army’s brutal Operation Sook Ching. Compared against Singapore’s other expenditures on new recreational facilities, protecting Bukit Brown costs almost nothing. Its cultural and historical significance as well as natural beauty provides an extra texture to Singapore that buildings and artificial landscapes just cannot.

Saving Bukit Brown simply makes sense. Beyond its importance to the natural environment and biodiversity in Singapore, Bukit Brown may be a key to sustainable development on our increasingly urbanised nation. This comes together with its significance to Singapore history and heritage, which can help bind future generations to our shared past and root them in Singapore, supplementing longstanding efforts at national education and nation-building. Doing so with generic modern buildings and artificial landscaping tends to be much more difficult. In addition, a natural and protected Bukit Brown can prove inviting to visitors, giving them an experience that is different from what is available elsewhere on the island — it is truly and uniquely Singapore.

Conserving Bukit Brown is neither difficult nor expensive to accomplish. Do the right thing. Push to protect Bukit Brown.

__________________

[1]
Concept Plan Review, Focus Group Consultation, Final Report on Land Allocation – submitted to the Ministry of National Development on 22 December 2000

 

 

[2]
Colin Dobrin, “America’s Top Cities: Cheapest Real Estate in the World?” – 26 September 2011

 

 

[4]
Shibani Mahtani, “State-of-the-Art Gardening, Singapore-Style”, The Wall Street Journal, 10 March 2012
Las Vegas Sands says Singapore casino opening delayed”, AsiaOne Travel, 08 July 2009
Genting says integrated resorts bill could rise to S$6.59b”, Channel News Asia, 19 February 2009

 

 

[6]
Generous mystery donor makes $8 million dino deal possible”, AsiaOne, 07 September 2011

 

 


To find out more, you can visit SOS Bukit Brown (and its facebook page) and Bukit Brown Cemetery (and its facebook page). Information on weekend tours of Bukit Brown conducted by volunteers are available from All Things Bukit Brown (and its facebook page).

You can also join the petition to save Bukit Brown at the SOS Bukit Brown website and individually write to your MP asking to save Bukit Brown, or demand for the public release of details surrounding the LTA's road-building plans, hydrology studies, biodiversity impact assessment, and other related evaluations, none of which have been made fully available to the public.

_______________________________

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

DPM Teo Chee Hean’s push for White Paper’s endorsement

By Sharon Ng The Population White Paper is an objective and balanced…

Migrant workers go hungry in rich Singapore due to subpar catering services

Singapore is well known the world over for its meticulous planning and…

Vaccinations of seniors have begun in Ang Mo Kio, Tanjong Pagar; vaccination centres slated for all 24 towns by end-March

COVID-19 vaccination of senior citizens has commenced, with the vaccination in Ang…

杨莉明:若企业变相裁员,将可能被取消雇佣补贴计划与工作准证配额

人力部长杨莉明表示,一旦发现公司变相裁员,将可能会被取消雇佣补贴计划(Jobs Support Scheme)与工作准证配额。 杨莉明于今日(4日)在国会上答复议员提问,人力部已向企业表明,除非万不得已,才能裁员。 “即使在冠状病毒19疫情期间,无论企业是以什么名义终止雇佣关系,若没有及时填补空缺,将会被认定为裁员。” 对此,当局也针对变相裁员的问题,发布明确的指导原则。如果企业在雇佣合约内列出遣散费条款,雇主将需支付遣散费。 至于面临经济拮据的雇主,杨莉明则表示,劳资政三方也同意雇主可以重新商谈和调整资遣费。不过就算在艰难时期,这些规定也不应被搁置,企业是必须在有限的能力范围内,给予员工支持。 她也强调,裁员是企业的最后手段,公司应该以调整成本为主,因此人力部也要求雇主提交对企业所采取的节约成本措施,并协同劳资政公平与良好雇佣联盟(TAFEP)与公司进行会谈。 另一方面,雇主与员工之间的无效沟通也会导致员工认为自己遭受不公平的对待。她举例,一位私立学前教育中心的雇主在没有清楚向员工解释其经营状况下,要求员工休年假,让员工误会并对此感到不满,但经过调查,才发现该中心的运营收入出现问题,因此不足以在阻断措施期间支付薪资。 杨莉明表示,很多时候雇主并非要求不合理,因此无论是雇主或员工,也应该在艰难时刻建立信任关系,并保持有效沟通。