~by: Leong Sze Hian~

I refer to the report “Over S$78m in Medifund aid given to needy in FY2010” (Channel NewsAsia, Mar 12).

It states that “Successful applications also went up by 22 per cent to more than 480,000 in 2010”.

In previous years, the statistics would also say what percentage of Medifund applications was successful. I believe the last reported figure was that about 99 per cent of applications were successful.

However, for this year, I am unable to find any mention of this statistic.

Actually, what is perhaps an even more significant statistic may be – what percentage of patients who applied was unsuccessful? (Note: “Applications are not equivalent to patients. A patient may make multiple applications for each hospitalisation and/or outpatient attendance bill”)

A patient who applies say 12 times in a year would be counted as 12 successful applications. Whereas a patient who is unsuccessful the first time, may never apply again.

Medifund criteria – secret?

What is the criteria for approving Medifund applications?

As I understand it, the only public information that is available in this regard, is that those who cannot pay for their medical bills can apply through the medical provider.

I have been told that to be successful, basically all family members must have hardly any Medisave in their accounts that can be used, have hardly any money in the bank, cannot stay in a 5-room HDB or bigger HDB flat or private property, etc.

I also understand that in order to be admitted to Class C and B2 ward or treatment, which are the only classes whereby Medifund can be used, a patient must be referred by a polyclinic or if the patient has a medical benefits card referral from a private clinic participating in the Primary Care Partnership Scheme (PCPS).

Medifund cannot use for polyclinic?

Medifund also cannot be used for polyclinic out-patient general consultation treatment, such that the medical providers have been raising funds through their own efforts to help such patients who cannot pay.

After writing off $90 million, patients still owe public hospitals $110 million.  

Medifund have surplus?

Despite the above statistics and Medifund use restrictions, $76 million of Medifund unultilised (surplus) has been transferred to the protected reserves. (Note: “The protected reserves comprise accumulated unutilised interest monies that were locked-up at the change-over of Government in December 2001 and May 2006. Authorisation from the President is required before the protected reserves can be used”)

Funds not allocated based on patients' needs?

I am rather puzzled as to why once again, the total assistance given by Medifund-approved institutions (MFIs) to patients formed less than (98%) the Medifund and Medifund Silver grants disbursed by MOH to MFIs in FY10. Utilisation of allocated funds increased compared to FY09. Any unspent funds will be carried over to assist patients in the next financial year.

As I understand it, MOH allocates a grant to each MFI at the beginning of the year for the whole year, and MFIs have to be prudent in ensuring that the grant is sufficent for the whole year. So, it is not based on the needs of patients for the year, but rather like how well the MFI is able to keep within the allocation for the whole year. In such a system, is it any wonder that there is always under-ultilised  funds, as no MFI would want to find itself in a situation whereby there is no money left for needy patients before the year ends?

So, does it mean that total disbursements from Medifund for the year may be more dependent on the interest from the Medifund Endowment Fund, rather than the needs of patients?

Endowment transfers means less Budget surplus?

The Medifund and Medifund Silver Endowment funds now stand at $1,973.3 million, with a capital injection of $200 million last year. In this connection, our Budget surpluses may have been in a sense, under-reported in comparison with other countries, as such transfers are made almost annually to the various endowment funds, like Medifund and the ComCare fund.


Support TOC! Buy Uncle Leong’s book here!

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Residents question decision to cease operations and amending bus services at Bukit Panjang

From 16 August onwards, the bus services 700 and 700A will cease…

本地新增两起入境病例,包括从印度入境的美籍女童

本地新增一起社区病例和两起入境病例,其中一人是从印度入境本地的八岁美国籍女童。 本地昨日(28日)新增359起冠病19病毒确诊病例,其中包括一起社区病例和两起入境病例。而该名女童与日前确诊的一岁印度籍男婴和37岁印度籍女子曾有过接触,而另名入境病例则为一名持有工作证的39岁印度籍男子。 两起病例也已在本月12日和13日抵达新加坡后,开始履行居家通知。 至于本地昨日唯一一起社区病例则为29岁印度籍男子,与早前确诊病例有过接触,隔离期间尽管没有出现任何症状,但被检测确诊。 除了社区和入境病例,其余病例则与住在宿舍的工作准证持有者有关,累计总数为5万1千197起。 而已有201名患者出院或离开社区隔离设施,康复人数增至4万5千893人。 5千092人在社区设施接受隔离或护理,185人则在医院留医,所幸无人在加护病房。死亡人数共有27人。

为迎新年理发 女子因发型“剪坏”当街发脾气

大部分华裔都会在农历新年莅临前,到发廊剪头发,希望把去年的晦气去除,迎接新希望,但是万一“剪坏”了,咋办?一名女子就因为“剪坏”了,而在理发院外大骂兼乱丢东西,吸引民众围观,同时引起网民热议。 署名Ang的网民,周一在脸书群组All Singapore Stuff 分享一段仅有21秒的视频,并写道女子因为被理发师毁了新年发型,将头发剪得太短,乱丢东西。 视频中只见一女子在街道走廊上乱抛物件泄愤,甚至大骂理发师将自己的头发剪得太短了。 “我的头发到腰这边,头发这样长,留了五年加两年,他跟我剪到这样短。” 路人见到女子在走廊发脾气,纷纷围观,一名男子更出声阻止女子的行动。 有关视频吸引了5万8000人观看,408人转发以及349个评语。 大部分网民都劝女子息怒,不要为了头发发脾气,“反正还会长的”。 有过同样经历的网民们也纷纷留言,表示了解女子的心情和感受,对她的情况表示同情,也劝她看开些。 有网友猜测是哪一间理发店,有者也分享自己去理发的惨痛经历:“虽然已经和理发师表示不要剪短过肩膀,但是最后出来的发型都非常短。”。

It is better to offer no excuse than a bad one

The above headline is a quote from George Washington, the first President…