TOC sent the following email to the Minister for Foreign Affairs and to Singapore's Permanent Representative to the United Nations today:

 
Mr K Shanmugam 
Minister for Foreign Affairs
 
Mr Albert Chua
Permanent Representaitve of Singapore to United Nations
 
 
Dear Minister and Permanent Representative to UN
 
As concerned Singaporeans who are keen to see Singapore maintain her good standing in the international community, we request the Singapore Ministry of Foreign Affairs to weigh in on the recent allegations levied against the Sri Lankan government for war crimes against humanity, allegedly carried out at the close of the conflict with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Elam in 2009.
 
In recent documentaries titled 'Sri Lanka's Killing Fields' and 'Sri Lanka's Killing Fields: War Crimes Unpunished', the United Kingdom's Channel 4 has brought to light disturbing evidence that supports allegations that the Sri Lankan government had deliberately targeted civilians in the civil war. Based on current available evidence, the United Nations has also called on the Sri Lankan government to accede to further investigation into the matter.
 
As a responsible member of the United Nations and of the international community, Singapore has a responsibility to play her part in ensuring that justice is done. This is doubly so, given that Singapore is a small nation with an interest in seeing international law, and not the law of jungle, prevail.
 
The civilian survivors of the Sri Lankan civil war are still living in deplorable conditions, with no proper roof over their heads and under threat of persecution. They have been denied of their rights, and what the UN decides will play a significant role in their futures, if not their very lives.
 
The UN Human Rights Council is currently discussing this matter. While Singapore is not a member of the UN HRC, nevertheless she can — and should — speak up and stand on the side of right and justice. Singapore is a respected voice on the international stage, and there can be great value in a statement by the Singapore government outside of the UN HRC.
 
When Singapore first joined the UN in 1965, then Foreign Affairs Minister S. Rajaratnam declared that Singapore was interested in fighting “wars that matter to the people (such as) the war against poverty, ignorance, disease, bad housing, unemployment, and anything and everything which deny dignity and freedom to our fellow men”. If there was ever such a time of need to fulfill the promise of our former Foreign Minister, this will be it.
 
As such, we sincerely request that the Singapore Government join international efforts in:
  1. Demanding for an independent, internationally led investigation into the alleged human rights contraventions in Sri Lanka in 2009;
  2. Stressing for immediate attention to be paid to alleviate the suffering of the survivors of the civil war, who currently live in dismal conditions and are still at risk of military persecution; and 
  3. Pressing for the perpetrators to be brought to justice and duly punished.
 
Thank you.
 
 
Ravi Philemon
Choo Zheng Xi
Siew Kum Hong
Joshua Chiang
Leong Sze Hian
Kumaran Pillai
Howard Lee
Gangasudhan
 
for The Online Citizen

The two documentaries (warning Graphic Violence) HERE.  

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

The end of 100 years “‘real’ affordable healthcare” under this present Parliament?

Parliament debates removing century-old law by sending to Select Committee 1st time since…

We don't want to meet Ngerng, say parents of children

No, we do not want to meet with Roy Ngerng. That was…

郑国明:探访亨德申路租赁组屋有感 让所有梦想幻灭地方…

撰文:人民之声党成员郑国明   林殊译 在飞往伦敦的班机上,我观看了香港电影《沦落人》(Still human),这是一个非常触动人心的故事,讲述一个半身不遂的老人梁先生(黄秋生饰演)与菲律宾女佣Evelyn Santo(Crisel Consunji饰演)居住在狭窄的公屋的故事。 狭窄昏暗的居住环境,让梁先生和菲佣日常生活显得非常心酸,菲佣的收入非常少,所以急于赚钱将家用寄回家中喂养孩子。然而,两人之间有相当大的差异:梁先生放弃所有获得好生活的希望与梦想;反观菲佣则是持续拥抱她自己无法完成的梦想-成为专业摄影师。 梁先生在意识到菲佣的梦想对他而言非常重要后,两人的生活产生了戏剧性的改变。梁先生为菲佣购买新的相机并帮助他完成摄影作品,好让她能够参加国际比赛,而最终她也胜出,故事的终结在菲佣结束合约持续追逐梦想,而善良的梁先生则继续不怀梦想地生活在公屋中,对生活并无任何期待。 那么,这个电影与我去探访探访亨德森路租赁组屋所见所闻,又有什么关联? 我与我的志工团队前往探访发现,许多住户的生活日复一日,过着捉襟见肘的生活。简言之,他们并没有足够的收入,或者无法从政府机构取得任何有意义的财务援助。有些住户则因健康问题无法工作,要么只能靠收入微薄的儿女,或者和行动不便的另一半共同生活。 其中一名女住戶回想起过往的经验,他向他的议员求助,却被转介到一个又一个的单位,最终不了了之。她说,“真是浪费时间”。另外几名住户则表示他们曾因为无法去邮局充值,结果房子电源被切断。试想,全家包括小朋友需要呆在黑暗之中整晚,直到父母去充值恢复屋内电源。 这到底是什么样的现代租赁组屋生活?…