~ By: Tan Kin Lian~

Many people are worried about the rising health care cost when they get old. They asked for my advice on the type of insurance that they can buy to cover these expenses.

Insurance

I want to be frank. Insurance may NOT be the answer. Here are my reason insurance works on the principle of risk pooling. Many people pay a small premium to buy insurance, so that a large payout can be given to the person who suffers the insured event. A good example is insurance covering death by accident. The expected claim rate is 1 in 2,000. If each person pays a premium of $50, the insurance pool can pay $100,000 to the single person who happens to die by accident. The actual premium payable will be more than $50 as the insurance company has to pay its expenses and wants to make a profit.

 

  1. This pooling does not apply to health insurance because each person wants to be insured for a lifetime and every one will eventually have to get a serious illness, either by cancer, organ failure (e.g. heart) or other critical conditions. It is likely that every person will make a claim on the health insurance policy – the question is whether it occurs earlier or later.
  2. Insurance will increase the total cost of health care by about 50% to cover the marketing and administration cost and the profit of the insurance company. If the average lifetime cost of health care is $100,000, you will have to pay $150,000 when you rely on insurance. If you find health care to be costly, you will find health insurance will be more costly.
  3. Insurance has the tendency to increase the cost of treatment. The insured person is likely to go for more expensive treatment, as it is covered by insurance. The actual cost of treatment carried out by a private specialist in a private hospital could be several times of the same treatment in a subsidised ward in a public hospital (ignoring the government subsidy). This is due to the lack of control over the billing by the private doctor. The actual cost of health insurance could be much higher than indicated earlier, due to inflation in charges.
  4. Every insured person wants the high medical bills will be paid by the insurance pool, i.e. by other people. Are they willing to pay for somebody else’s bill?
  5. There is also non-clarity in coverage. Many patients have incurred large medical bills, only to find that a large portion of the bill is not covered by insurance, due to exclusions, limits, co-insurance and deductible. The actual coverage under health insurance can be quite complicated for the ordinary lay person to understand.

Possible benefits

Health insurance can be useful under some circumstances, for example, if it is managed effectively and the insurance company can help the insured person to find more cost effective treatment. This would require the insured person to get the advice of the insurance company (through its medical adviser) to identify the appropriate treatment for the medical condition and the specialist who offers a competitive fee for the treatment

Unfortunately, most insured people do not trust the insurance company’s doctor as they may suspect that the doctor will try to save cost for the insurance company by offering inferior treatment.

The patient should also be wary about the advice given by the treating specialist, as the specialist may has a vested interest to increase up the medical fees. Anecdotal evidence has shown that the bills paid by insurance are higher than the cost that is paid out of pocket by the patient.

In some countries, the government provide tax relief to encourage health insurance coverage. If the subsidy is substantial, it will negate the higher cost of health insurance. Unfortunately, there is no such subsidy in Singapore.

 

Picture Credit: Leslie Chew

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Downgrade or Lease buyback? Worse off by $700k?

By Leong Sze Hian I refer to the article “Lease  buyback scheme…

$56,000 for 3 “work plans” retreats for grassroots organisations?

In his response to questions on the Auditor General’s Office (AGO) report…

Environment Issues brought out by Workers’ Party MPs

MP for Aljunied GRC, Pritam Singh spoke in the parliament on Tuesday…

涉拥有并泄露病患个资 费雷拉在美国受审继续还押

涉泄露艾滋病患个资的美国男子费雷拉,在美国法院受审。法官责令费雷拉继续还押,而基于费雷拉被指涉威胁勒索新加坡政府,当地大陪审团则考量是否起诉他。 现年34岁的费雷拉,在本月27日出席肯塔基州列克星敦的联邦法院,出庭时身披黄色囚衣,也被上手铐。 他在上周因涉嫌非法盗窃他人个资和涉蓄意散播这些资料,而在当地被捕入狱。 美国联邦调查局在周三的审讯再提出两项指控,即费雷拉涉勒索和威胁,并非法散播这些病患个资,他面对的指控一旦罪成可判刑七年。 在得知自己可能面对在美国入狱时,费雷拉曾告诉法官“美国政府不重视任命价值”。他没有向法官求情,惟其代表律师表示其当事人仍保持无罪。 费雷拉目前仍拘留于美国费耶特县拘留中心,预计陪审团仍需数周时间商议是否对他提出起诉。 在本月22日联邦调查局提呈的证词,显示费雷拉承认他持有来自新加坡的艾滋病患数据,而如果可以说服新加坡政府释放他的丈夫吕德祥医生,他将会交出这些个资,然后自杀。否则,他将把这些资料公诸于众。 而该局在本月27日提呈的第二份证词,则显示费雷拉曾把部分病患个资电邮到一些新加坡政府机构,“其目的是进行要挟以达成目的,即,要求针对他的指控展开进行调查、废除艾滋病患数据库,以及要求释放其丈夫吕德祥“。 联邦调查局也指出,费雷拉从2018年6月至今年初,从美国肯德基州对一些媒体机构包括CNN、《海峡时报》、母舰以及Alvinology等发电邮泄露这些病患个资。 费雷拉的母亲特蕾莎金曾告诉联邦调查局,打从费雷拉自2018年四月离开新加坡后,返回美国就一直和她同住。在证词中,母亲表示“很害怕费雷拉”。 代表律师:费雷拉引渡新加坡面控可能性不大 费雷拉告诉法官,他面对他难以忍受的创伤后压力障碍。他声称在新加坡服刑期间曾遭轮奸而感染艾滋,但此事被新加坡政府否认。…