~By: Kumaran Pillai~

Dr. James Gomez, head of the policy unit of the Singapore Democratic Party introduced the panel of doctors at the Launch of the SDP National Health Care Plan. It was a culmination of efforts and an enhancement of what the SDP team had put together in their shadow healthcare plan during the General Elections in 2011. With more inputs from a panel of 9 physicians, and from party cadres, members and volunteers, the SDP confidently proposed landmark changes to our healthcare system.

A check on the World Health Organisation Rankings showed that Singapore was ranked 6th globally [here]. Based on the same report, it seems like we are leading by miles compared to the healthcare systems provided by our neighbouring countries. Yet, listening to the presentation of A/Prof Paul Tambyah, it was apparent that, what we need now are not just tweaks to the current system, but a total overhaul.  It was disheartening to hear that under the current administration, a good portion of those who needed primary healthcare in Singapore were falling through the cracks.

While Minister Khaw has access to an $8.00 heart surgery [here], the medical costs for any heart ailment, according to SDP’s panel of doctors, can run into thousands for the man on the street. The crux of SDP’s healthcare plan tackles the issue of affordability and drives home the fundamental point that patients are irrational consumers and therefore a vulnerable group that needs State protection.

Under their plan, there are ‘no-compromises’ on either quality or speed of service. All patients, rich or poor will be treated equally – all patients will be in 2-beded wards. Hence, they plan to eliminate the current class structures with a single stroke.

 “Healthcare is a need and not a commodity,” said Dr. Gomez, to drive home the point that for-profit healthcare systems have failed to support citizens in the fringes of our society.

Currently, our hospitals are overcrowded and patients are waitlisted for their turns. It was also revealed in the recent budget debate that some patients who fall behind in their medical bills are harassed by debt collectors who were engaged by the hospitals [here].

In a recent article published by Asiaone [here], there was one Madam Tan Miu Muay that has not been receiving proper medical care for the last 10 years because she could not afford it. These were the kind of cases that SDP cited in their presentation.

There was also a call to increase the healthcare budget of what is currently proposed. Singapore’s current healthcare subsidies are far lower than what is provided for in other mature economies in Asia. (See SDP healthcare plan)

The main feature of SDP’s proposal is the single payer system, where the government underwrites 90% of the healthcare costs through a risk-sharing, state-funded insurance scheme. Under this scheme, each adult citizen needs to only contribute a sum of S$600 per annum through their CPF. For those who can’t afford that amount, the government underwrites the premium. 

It is noteworthy to mention what Dr. Chee Soon Juan said in his opening remarks, that some Singaporeans have told him, “it is better to die than to fall sick in Singapore.” He has taken heed and it seems like he has gone all out to ensure that no sick man goes untreated, no family needs to be financially burdened when their loved ones fall sick and most importantly, everyone in Singapore has access to basic healthcare.  

“The family and loved ones are already under stress and anguish when someone dear falls ill, we certainly don’t need them to go through the indignity of having debt collectors chasing them for monies accumulated through medical bills,” Dr. Chee said.

SDP’s healthcare plan is a total affront to the current practise of commercialization of healthcare in Singapore. With no representation in parliament, it makes one wonder why they are putting so much effort – it can’t be, as they put it, for PAP to plagiarize their plans. Or perhaps, it could be an indication of their larger plans, both for Singapore and SDP in 2016.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

选举局:总统选委会不筛选总统候选人选

本月13日,《海峡时报》评论编辑蔡美芬(Chua Mui Hoong)发表一篇评论:《行动党和支配政治》,抨击执政政府有意在政治和学术圈维持支配地位,惟必须当心因为过于蛮横,而被视为随时准备打压异议者的支配政党。 她先是非议此前教育部长王乙康,在国会上针对剧作家亚菲言的言论,指出副总理王瑞杰声称“要谦逊聆听和尊重国人的观点”,一同建设更好的新加坡,言犹在耳,而王乙康的做法,又是否代表整个政府领导层的立场? 他也认为实则耶鲁-国立大学学院异议课程被腰斩的事件,不过反映了政府近期对于异议采取更为严厉的手段,例如通过《防假消息法》;历史学者覃炳鑫,指行动党政府在1963年假借国安为由,以“冷藏行动”对付异议者,结果遭到“审问”和穷追猛打。 她认为这些都是人民行动党在公开场合彰显自己支配地位的例子,它的力量几乎延伸至生活各个层面;在国会中掌控83个多数议席;至于总统虽是直接选举产生,但政府仍能通过总统选举委员会,在筛选候选人人选时产生影响。 选举局反驳总统选委会不筛选候选人 不过,选举局高级副总监Tay Chai Luan,在本月19日在《海时》反驳,有关蔡美芬指“总统选举委会对候选人筛选能产生影响”一说有误,并解释该委会从未筛选候选人选,仅依据宪法指定的条件,确保候选人符合参选资格,无权阻止任何合格人士参选。 “总统选举委会(PEC)是独立机构,其组成规定也列在宪法中。由公共服务委员会主席担任主席,成员包括新加坡会计与企业管理局主管、少数种族权利总统理事会主席委任的四位成员、总统顾问理事会主席、大法官和总理等。” 在2017年的总统选举,总统选举委会成员分别是:…

公用局:若无法解决违约问题 将接管大泉水厂

公用事业局(PUB)于昨日(21日)发文告,表明若凯发集团无法在期限内解决大泉水电厂购水协议的所有违约问题,将终止购水协议,接管海水淡化厂。 公用局强调,将采取行动保障我国水供安全。考量到大泉水电厂目前财务状况,公用局献议以零元收购还是淡化厂,该厂无需支付任何赔偿。 本月5日,公用局就已向凯发的大泉水电厂发出违约通知,要求从当天起的30天内,必须解决违约问题。该局指出,大泉水电厂无法履行购水协议下的多项合约义务,尤其未能按照需求让水电厂继续可靠运作。 该厂甚至无法提供财务证据,证明水电厂有能力维持未来半年的运营。 该局称,大泉水电厂从2017年开始,就无法履行合约中的条款。当局已经给该厂足够时间去解决运营和财务问题,但现在的状况,违约情况很可能无法短期内改善,为此公用事业局需考量措施,确保我国的水供来源安全、充足。 大泉水电厂是在本周三询问公用局,若公用局有意收购,将接管整个水电厂,还是只接管海水淡化厂。 公用局表示,大泉水电厂此前曾表示,海水淡化厂即便未来几年还会继续亏钱,发电厂亦同。预见未来情况仍不会那么快好转。 公用局发出的违约通知截止日期是4月5日。 在2011年的水供协议下,从2013年至2038年,大泉水电厂每天必须提供7千万加仑的淡化水给公用局。 恐影响凯发“白武士”退出重组计划 公用局表示,收购大泉水电厂的价格将根据购水协议,由独立估价师评估。目前,该厂的估值为负值,即便完成收购,可能还要赔偿公用局。不过,公用局已表明,可以零元收购淡水厂并免除掉赔偿。 受到公用局违约通知影响,凯发的“白武士”印尼财团SM投资(SMI,或三林集团)的重组计划或有变动。凯发在本月18日指出,三林向该公司发出通知,指出若无法解决与公用局的违约通知,三林可履行合约权利,退出重组计划。…

Police report filed against PAP’s Murali Pillai over “falsehoods” regarding “scurrilous attack” on his family

A police report was made against PAP candidate Murali Pillai on 8…

Netizens feel SingPost needs to buck up their mail delivery services

On 2 January, The Straits Times (ST) published a complaint letter by…