"Public transport concessions are given to different groups of individuals such as students, senior citizens and males serving their National Service. Such concessions are presently not provided to persons with disabilities. To promote independence and participation of persons with disabilities in activities and to facilitate social inclusion, the Committee  requests public transport operators to provide transport concessions for persons with disabilities as a demonstration of their corporate social responsibility. These concessions would also help persons with disabilities to defray the rising transport costs."

This recommendation of the Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports, found in its 'Enabling Masterplan 2012 – 2016', raised our hope that perhaps now, after waiting for more than 13 years, people with disabilities will be given subsidies on public transport.

The Transport Minister however dashed this hope by deciding to maintain status quo and not give concessionary fares to people with disabilities.

"… I am sympathetic to…the disabled…(but) not all of these requests (for subsidies) can be addressed immediately or entirely within a single Fare Revision Exercise…while sympathetic to all these requests for concessions for the disabled…(we) cannot accede to these requests immediately or entirely within a single fare adjustment exercise." – Speech by Transport Minister in Parliament dated 7 Mar 2012

By rejecting the requests by various Members of Parliament to give subsidy in public transport to people with disabilities, the Transport Minister has clearly sent out a signal that pragmatism is more important than values. That is quite regrettable.

The subsidy if it had been given, would have enabled us, the more vulnerable in society, live more useful, active and engaged lives. Now, we have to wait and hope for the subsidy to come in the next public transport fare revision.

While this may not mean much for most people, it certainly means a lot to people with disabilities, who (if employed) earn a meagre amount and usually spend more than a third of that income on transportation. It is even more unfair for those that are not employed and their caregivers.

At this stage, we think it is important to also acknowledge the various people who have advocated our cause. Ms Sylvia Lim who first raised our concerns in Parliament in March 2010;  Associate Professor Fatimah Lateef who asked the Minister of Transport recently in Parliament if 'concessionary fares can be extended to the disabled using public transport'; Mr Ravi Philemon, who has persisted in helping to ensure that our voices are heard; and all our well-wishers that signed our petition.  

Reena Rajesvari
Citizen of Singapore with disability
 
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

陈振声吁勿艰难时刻解雇员工 业者哭诉人力部提不同建议

由于近期受到武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)疫情的打击,贸工部长陈振声建议业者和他的基层领导们勿在艰难时刻解雇员工,同时也应遵循政府建议,加以培训员工。 陈振声上周与新加坡中华总商会(SCCCI)以及新加坡商业人士举办闭门会议中表示,“趁现在仍然有能力时,能不能先不立即解雇工人,而是接受政府建议训练员工,利用一些机会协助员工待在下来,以为下一阶段做准备。” 他也补充,“如果你立即解雇员工,我们可能会再次陷入困境。” 与会者哭诉不想炒员工 上周,政府指出未来数个月内,将会出现普遍放缓的情况,预期对相关行业和公司产生连锁反应,因此政府准备支持相关行业公司与员工。 其支持措施包括协助公司留住与培训员工,并承担部分工资费用。 而根据疑是在会议现场的录音,现场其中一位与会者提出疑问,她表示,虽然很同意陈振声这一番话,但她也在此前曾拜访过人力部,却也听到不同的建议。 她强调,人力部称,若她无法保留员工,就应该让他们走。“我并不想解雇我的员工,但人力部却要求我解雇他们”,她含泪说着。 陈振声则表示,人们必须随着现况改变其商业模式,使其更具多元化。 “如果你不想改变也不多样化,即使得到我们的相助,我们也无法替你解决下一次的问题。我们可以保证会给予你协助,但同时你也需要提升自己。” 企业必须学会“多元化” 陈振声也进一步阐述,企业必须尽快学会“多元化”,“因为它影响你、我以及所有人。”…

Caretakers of Panther cry uncontrollably at its memorial, knowing it was cruelly thrown down from 22nd floor

SINGAPORE — Caretakers of “Panther” simply could not hold their tears at…

将上诉市镇会诉讼判决 林瑞莲指王瑞杰提动议“言之过早”

上月11日,高庭法官加南拉美斯(Kannan Ramesh)宣读判词,指工人党主席林瑞莲、秘书长毕丹星和前秘书长刘程强,须为阿裕尼-后港市镇会蒙受损失,承担法律责任。 故此,副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰,于今日在国会提动议,要求刘程强和林瑞莲回避一切和阿裕尼-后港市镇会相关财政事务。 不过林瑞莲也回应,他们将对有关市镇会诉讼判决提出上诉,且截止日是在下周一(11日),故此王瑞杰的动议似乎“言之过早”。 她提醒不满判决一方有一个月期限可提出上诉。她也指出,他们仍在和律师研究有关判决,也向议会报告,他们将对此诉讼提出上诉,要求议员们拒绝王瑞杰的动议。 王瑞杰充重申议员应保持高标准诚信和责任感,在发言时多次引述高庭判决中对工人党的指责,也要求该党不该躲避,应对此做出解释。 “将近四周已过,但工人党仍保持沉默,未对此作出道歉,以及如何解决失误。”他也把问题抛向现任阿裕尼后港市镇会主席费沙和其他工人党议员,包括费沙会否对阿裕尼和后港居民道歉,以及解除林瑞莲作为市镇会副主席的职务。 他认为,如果直到上诉前什么都不做,那么可认定工人党实际上默许“不诚实和违反信托义务的行为”,甚至是共谋的。 有关市镇会从2011年7月至2015年7月间,支付了FMSS公司多达3370万元。这段期间,林瑞莲为市镇会主席,而刘程强当时为工人党秘书长。至于毕丹星当时担任市镇会招标与合约委员会成员。 去年10月初,高庭展开对工人党市镇会诉讼审讯,阿裕尼—后港市镇会(AHTC)和白沙—榜鹅市镇会(PRPTC)指责刘程强、林瑞莲、毕丹星等八造,必须对2011年5月至2015年11月期间,对第三方承包商的不当付款行为负起责任以及索偿。  

Veteran advocate for the disabled community steps down as advisor for Disabled People Association

A veteran advocate for the disabled community Mr Nicholas Aw has stepped…