~By: Teo Soh Lung ~

 

My last response to Minister Teo Chee Hean’s speech in parliament that was reported in The Straits Times of 20 October 2011 was made on 9 November 2011. The sub-title to that reply was Making use of the Church and it drew a number of pretty angry comments.  In between then and now, I was somehow distracted by other issues.  The news-cuttings of Minister Teo’s memorable speech however, has not been misplaced all these months. It has suffered some severe damage under the claws of my cat, Angel though. She was probably more angry at the speech than me!
 
As the 25 anniversary of the 1987 arrest of “Marxist conspirators” approaches, I want to demolish once and for all Minister Teo’s specious assurance that there are sufficient safeguards under the ISA.  These safeguards are summarised in The Straits Times at page A33 and I shall deal with them in the order set out by its writer or editors.
 
Only 30 days
 
The first safeguard is that a person can only be held for 30 days after which the minister or rather the cabinet have to decide  if he or she should be issued the Order of Detention for a maximum of two years, renewable at the end of the period or released unconditionally or be subjected to a  Restriction Order i.e. subject to conditions, such as restriction of movement or association.
 
I want to emphasise that 30 days in a prison cell or in a freezing cold room is not 30 days spent in one’s own house. Try putting the minister in a freezing cold room with two spotlights shining into his eyes. He is a military man and he should be able to  take the cold better than me. Let him wear the prison garb of cotton top and trousers without his underwear. Make him stand 50 hours out of 72 hours in that room and subject him to continuous interrogation. Let ISD officers shout at him and tell him that everything he said are lies and that he is just good at telling fairy tales. Deprive him of sleep for just three days and nights.
 
If the minister survives these 72 hours (ISD officers don’t even need to lay hands on him) without making and signing a false statement, then he has my greatest admiration and respect.  
 
From my experience and the experience of my friends, no one can survive three days and nights of continuous interrogation in a cold room in the basement of Whitley Detention Centre. From his account in To catch a Tartar, Mr Francis Seow, the former Solicitor-General could not too.  I can say with confidence that even the director of ISD will not be able to withstand 72 hours of continuous interrogation in that cold room. Anyone in Singapore who can survive such treatment without writing a false statement, must either be a hardcore criminal or an imbecile who cannot write a statement no matter how he is threatened.
 
The cold room treatment is not the only experience all ISA detainees go through. For nearly a week, none of us was allowed contact with the outside world.  On the sixth day, two family members were allowed to visit us. Imagine the panic caused to our families when they discover their children, spouses, brothers and sisters missing for 6 long days in a first world country. In this regard, ISA prisoners are accorded treatment worse than ordinary criminals for the latter are at least allowed to be produced in court within 48 hours and family members are informed of their whereabouts by the police.
 
30 days for ISD officers to investigate a conspiracy or fabricate a conspiracy is a long time. I thought we have the brightest scholars working in the ISD? Why do they need 30 days to decide whether to detain a prisoner or release him?  Surely by the end of three days, they would have completed their investigation and either slam the order of detention on them or release them.  Why do they need to fully utilise the 30 days allowed by the law?  Is it to unnecessarily punish the innocent prisoner or is it because they are so inefficient or so daft that they cannot complete their investigation? 
 
But if they are not able to complete their investigation, how is it that they could produce a script for detainees to appear on state television three weeks after our arrest?  Shouldn’t they be putting all their attention on investigating our “crimes” rather than turn us into television stars?  Worse, we or at least I was told that if I didn’t appear on television, they would “throw away the key,” meaning I would languish in jail for a very long time.
 
I shall pause here and continue at a later date because I feel sick remembering what 30 days mean to an ISA detainee.  The ISA in allowing a person to be detained for 30 days is not providing him with any safeguard.  Rather, the law in allowing 30 days for investigation is granting ISD officers and the government more than adequate time to fabricate a story for public consumption, to instil fear in them and to unnecessarily punish and intimidate a detainee.
 
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Temasek looks to takeover Keppel with a S$4.1 billion bid for another 30.55% shares

As trading in Keppel Corporation Limited shares was halted on 18 October,…

李显龙接受《日经亚洲评论》采访:贸易战长期影响深远 指香港处在艰难时刻

新加坡总理李显龙在昨日(24日)接受《日经亚洲评论》(Nikkei Asian Review)采访,指贸易战走向长期化带来的影响可能比金融危机更严重,期待中美两国尽早达成妥协。 对于正面对群众集会抗议撤回《逃犯条例》的香港,他形容这是中国和香港面对的艰难局面,也可以预见在即将来临的G20峰会,美国总统川普在与中国领导人习近平会面时,将提及此事。 在与《日经亚洲评论》记者访谈中,他表示对于中美当前关系感到担忧,“我们希望习近平和川普,能在大阪达成有建设性的会面,让事情朝积极方向发展。” 他也认为,两国高层领导都必须积极接触,双方必须有明确目标和关注议题,并达成一定共识。在该战略框架内,两国官员再各别处理如贸易、知识产权和网安等事项。 李显龙认为两国也应先从较容易的课题着手,在转向更为重要的事务前,先建立起信任,例如贸易课题,“如果你要谈科技问题,就会触碰网安问题。如果你谈人权问题十分复杂也牵涉很多层面。”但如果一方企图利用贸易作为一种凌驾手段,只会影响谈判。 记者也询问李显龙,如今贸易紧张局势,是否会显得比10年前的金融危机严重? 李显龙表示短期内他不认为。金融危机的即时和突发性质比较不同。“但长期而言,贸易关系紧张可能对全球经济结构造成非常严重的后果,在全球化情境下造成科技、市场和信任的分歧。这些结构性影响可以维持数十年之久,且可能比金融危机更严重。” 关于东盟为避免纷争而与中国推进协商的南海行为准则,李显龙表示,“当然应该与包括《联合国海洋法公约》在内的国际法一致”。 记者也指出,香港”反送中“集会预计将成为川普和习近平会面讨论的事项之一,对此李显龙表示可以预见,且这课题对于中方来说相当艰难,中方视之为主权课题。”这是他们经历的苦难局面,我们和香港有许多生意往来,当然也希望他们能克服这些困难。“ 他也透露,将在来届选举结束后不久,交棒给现任副总理王瑞杰。…

男子遇袭浑身血逃超市求救! 18岁嫌犯落网

一名23岁的本地男子被人追砍,浑身是血地跑到超市内求救,超市员工急忙关上大门救下男子,而涉嫌砍人的18岁男子已经被逮捕了。 Our Singapore脸书群组昨日(10月7日)分享了数张照片和一段目击者录音,指在文礼的职总平价超市内,有一名男子受到他人追砍,满身鲜血地跑入超市内。目击者表示,受伤男子跑入超市内后,机警的超市职员急忙关上大门,还帮忙报警了。之后现场就来了很多警察,“男子没死,真的很命大”。 据Singapore Uncensored贴文描述,超市职员为受伤男子进行急救。而根据网上流传的照片,受伤男子几乎血流满面,衣服也都是鲜血,他走过的地方也是血迹斑斑,非常吓人。 警方指出,于昨日中午12时40分接获通报,在文礼坊221号发生持危险武器蓄意伤人事件,一名23岁男子遭另一名男子用到追砍。受伤男子之后在意识清醒的情况下,被送入黄廷方综合医院,脸部和头部都受伤了。 警方透露,涉嫌持危险武器蓄意伤人的18岁嫌犯,已经被警方逮捕了。

Purpose-built dormitories that house migrant workers see a 25% drop in occupancy

As more migrant workers’ dormitories are gradually being cleared of COVID-19, it…