~by: Simeon Ang~

Pragmatism, an attribute that our government is known to propagate in all of its policies, is clearly evident in this year’s budget. Analysts were right to tone down expectations about the possibilities that Budget 2012 would pump a huge stimulus into the economy on a short term basis.

Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister, Tharman Shanmugaratnam, mentioned from the start of his speech, that even though the estimated GDP growth of one to three percent for 2012, was lower than previously anticipated, it was still somewhere within the medium term growth potential of three to five percent for Singapore. Thus, setting the stage for its utilitarian budget that is expected to yield a $2.8 billion primary surplus for FY12.

A few key thrusts emerged from the budget that would directly affect businesses in Singapore. These thrusts would significantly affect the labour market, and three different sectors in the economy, namely, the tourism sector, the public transport sector and the healthcare sector.

Populist Labour Measures?

Off the bat, the finance minister remarked of the need to “reduce (the economy’s) dependence on foreign labour”. What came next could be widely contrived as a populist move to stymie increasing criticism from the ground about pro-immigration policies. The minister sought to introduce a reduction in the dependency ratio ceiling (DRCs) in the manufacturing and services sectors.

While the writer will not go into details about the changes, it is notable that the steps taken by the government could instead lead to higher inflation. This additional focus to hire locals as well as boost lower income wages could cut both ways as prices for goods and services will likely be driven up as businesses push cost increases to consumers. As OCBC’s review aptly puts it, “In the end, whether your income growth outstrips inflation or inflation outstrips your income growth will be the key determinant of whether your real wealth goes up or down”.

An Investment into a Tourism Hub

In a further boost to the local tourism industry, the government intends to inject a further $905 million into the Tourism Development Fund (TDF) as it jostles with other tourism destinations for the coveted tourist dollar. The fund, previously announced in 2004, seeks to ensure that Singapore has sufficient world-class infrastructure and tourism amenities to compete with regional rivals. It also helps the private sector to organize “iconic events” which boost tourist traffic. One such example is the Formula One race which is partly funded by the fund.

While the view that Singapore aspires to be a hub in all-too-many-places continues to be validated, it can be said that the tourist dollar is more attractive than most. In a way, the tourist dollar is a foreign direct investment in particular to the retail industry. While that direct investment could aid and cushion any impact domestically, it comes with its own price. For instance, the drive for the tourist dollar has led to the two integrated resorts that grace our shores and has reaped incredible revenues both in the retail industry as well as tax revenues. However, the social ills of which, cannot be ignored.

An Election Bugbear Addressed

OCBC contends that this year’s budget has addressed one of the main bugbears in the 2011 general election. In its review of the budget, OCBC said that budget 2012 recognises that transport infrastructure has not quite kept pace with the growth in the workforce. There is thus expectation that transport spending will increase by some 17.8 percent.

The government has also earmarked $1.1 billion to increase the supply of buses and reduce crowding and waiting times for buses in the short term. 550 buses will be publicly funded, with the remaining privately funded by the PTOs. The finance minister stressed that this investment would on a one-time basis and that bus operations will ultimately rest on PTOs’ improvements in efficiency as well as fare revenues. Whether these capital expenditures will be linked to future fare hikes, remains much to be seen, however, this writer feels that it will be more likely than not.

Tuning in to the Graying Heart of the Nation

Singapore will be doubling the amount it spends on healthcare in an attempt to address the concerns of a graying population. Yearly healthcare expenditure is set to increase from the current $4 billion to $8 billion over the next five years. The increase will go towards enhancing healthcare infrastructure as well as increasing healthcare manpower, including doctors and nurses.  Support for the middle class on the taking up of private healthcare services was also on the cards as the government sought to assuage fears of burgeoning healthcare expenses.

OCBC feels that the significant investment is in line with the government’s aim of portraying the nation as a medical hub and will go some ways in attaining that goal.

Pragmatism in the Face of a Downturn

Notwithstanding the commercial aspects of the above, it is imperative to note that the government has not taken too kindly to stimulus measures, opting instead, to invest on a long term basis. However astute as it might be, this leaves the short and medium term vulnerable to exposure to an external shock.

The writer notes that in a separate statement by Bank of America in which the banking giant said that, "While the consensus has shifted (about a US economic turnaround), we haven’t,” said BOA. “We continue to argue that the recent improvement is due to a recovery from the oil and Japan shocks, but ultimately will be reversed by shocks in the second half of this year. Moreover, in our view, recent news underscores, rather than undercuts our forecast of a very weak second half.”

Being an export driven economy, we are often faced with upheavals in the economic and financial market. In particular, any shock factors experienced in the US market is felt exponentially here in Singapore. That is not to say, that if such a doomsday-prediction were to be realised, our government would be caught with their pants down. The government still has the reactionary ability to create an additional discretionary budget to combat a steeper than expected downturn. In the meantime, the business community will continue to look to the government regarding the implementation of initiatives that it has espoused in Budget 2012.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

马哈迪未咨询内阁委反贪会主席,净选盟抨权力过大

马来西亚致力推动选举改革的大型社运阻止净选盟(BERSIH)于昨日(6日)发文告表示,质疑委任公正党前中委拉蒂花为反贪污委员会主席的程序,认为委任过程体现政府体制内的弱点,难免让人联想滥权的可能。 “这一切是首相马哈迪自己点名委任,过程中并未经过内阁咨询,他表示不想被部长左右他的选择。 文告指出,尽管现有的法律允许首相向国家元首提议人选,但显然并不利于民主政府的发展。 净选盟2.0以马国前首相纳吉为例,纳吉使用相同权力委任盟友担任关键公职,试图逃避一马公司(1MDB)审议,继续掌权。 文告还说,希盟政府在掌权之际曾承诺推动分权,恢复国会尊严,成立各独立机关如反贪会、选委会、司法委任委员会、人权委员会、国家水供委员会及官联公司独立。 有鉴于此,净选盟2.0呼吁希盟政府能够立即实施改革措施,将上诉机关需独立的诉求列入法律。净选盟2.0 提议在来临的7月的国会会议中列入讨论范围。 “若下议院需要三分二多数议员的支持修宪,我们呼吁反对党也能够跨党派地支持,以建立制衡的机制。”文告表示。 文告续指,任何良好的委任都有可能被下一任首相能够随时解除委任,除非将委任程序制度化。 “我们无法期盼所有首相都带着善意与正义执行任务,所以我们需要更强大独立的机关与程序来制衡首相与其他官员的权利。” 虽支持拉蒂花委任主席,但需经公平公正委任程序 一项合理健全的委任程序是需要成立提名委员会,经公众与民间的提名,选择合适的人选,递呈国会公共服务任命特别委员会,鉴定符合公信力的人选并提议给首相,甚至是国家元首。…

王乙康回应耶鲁-国大取消异议课程事件 亚菲言脸书澄清数点

上月中旬,耶鲁—国大学院临时取消一门名为《新加坡的异议与抵抗》的课程。有关课程将由新加坡知名剧作家亚菲言(Alfian Sa’at),与参与学生探讨本土的公民抗命模式。 此后美国耶鲁大学总校对此展开调查,包括耶鲁—国大教员以及原本负责策划课程的亚菲言(Alfian Sa’at)会面,了解来龙去脉,表示课程没有影响学术自由与开放审视,取消课程是考虑到学术要求和法律问题。 对此,包括宏茂桥集选区议员殷丹博士、马林百列集选区议员谢健平、官委议员特斯拉博士和王丽婷等人,都对此事深表关注,在国会作出提问,质问课程遭腰斩的原因,或此举是否意味着对学府内的学术环境更为受控和僵化? 教育部长王乙康在回答议员提问时则解释,“本地学府被用来进行党派政治平台,表达对政府异议,不是空穴来风”,而教育部了解有关课程后也表达了担忧。 他说,课程也让学生参观芳林公园和展示示威标语,而这可能让学生面对触法的风险。 此外,邀请社运分子范国瀚、施兰巴莱等曾因公共秩序有关罪行被定罪的人物;以及邀请《新叙事》的负责人覃炳鑫和韩俐颖等人,他指两人接受“外国资金”。 王乙康似乎对亚菲言近日来在脸书发表的贴文做功课,他引述亚菲言在本月5日(周六)的贴文,指后者提到复兴“新加坡学生运动”,特别是在“政治自觉化”等领域。 实际上,亚菲言的原贴文是指,耶鲁国大有许多学生关心他的近况,他赞扬许多大学生都很聪明敏锐,并且受到强烈道德正义感驱使。他认为,这似乎某种程度上有一部分,是源于新加坡学生运动的复兴,特别是在政治自觉、气候变化、性别权益等领域。 王乙康称:“负责有关课程的个人可以保有对新加坡的看法,甚至公开在社交媒体,但我们是否应让这种政治异议存在于我们的教育中?” 有者认为学府享有学术自由,培养学生批判精神,甚至异议能有助促进民主。但王乙康指出,考量所有因素和涉及的人物,会发现“这是有动机和目的的课程”。…

Scoot wins its second “Best Low-Cost Carrier" award in a month

After flying past reigning champion AirAsia to take home the “Best Low-Cost…