~by: Gordon Lee~

Welcome to the last part of this article. In the previous three parts, I have hopefully shown that an ageing population is not as bad as this Government would have you believe. This issue has been unfortunately politicised to serve certain political imperatives, and has become a part of the collective consciousness of this country.

In Part Three, I suggested that falling birthrates are a natural response to social and economic changes, and that policies designed to reverse falling birthrates are instead worsening the conditions causing the phenomenon. I also outlined how this Government’s “war” on females and the elderly is extremely unhealthy.

Now, in Part Four, I intend to not only show that an ageing population is not bad, but also to suggest some potential benefits of an ageing population. Hopefully, this will add a different perspective and depth to the public debate.

Volunteering

Older people can be more involved in volunteering than other age groups – as illustrated by research conducted in Australia [1], the Netherlands, Finland and France [2].

Whilst this may not currently be the case in Singapore, this Government can learn from best practices around the world to encourage older people to not only work past retirement, but also to contribute to society through volunteering. This Government can also look at removing some of the obstacles to volunteering by older people, and prevent the social exclusion which many older people face. This is active ageing which benefits both the old, and society at large. Ideas such as a national body or programme to encourage volunteering by older people, or a fund to support such programmes – can help create a healthy old, a healthy mind, and a healthy society.

Although volunteering does not contribute to GDP figures, they do create value in society because the work they do is useful. Simply put, if a volunteer and a paid staff undertakes the same work, the same value is created. The only difference is that the work of the volunteer does not show up in GDP figures, but the work done by the paid staff does. The value created by volunteering was estimated at £41bn for the UK in 1995 [3], and $41bn for Australia in 1997 [4].

Crime

There is also reason to believe that an ageing population is responsible for falling crime rates around the world – be it in the US [5], Canada [6] or New Zealand [7]. This is not only socially beneficial, but in terms of public finances, it also reduces the costs of policing and incarceration.

A happier population

Studies suggest that the old are happier than the rest of the population [8][9][10]. It is also said that being around happy people makes us happy – which means a happier and more satisfied society at large.

Other social benefits

Older people also benefit those around them by being able to provide experience, wisdom, practical and financial help – not least since the old today are healthier and wealthier than ever before. They also help to constitute an experienced workforce that is valued in a world of work that is no longer as manual or physically demanding as they once were.

The older generation is, in many ways, a social asset and resource that should be valued, not “blamed”.

Conclusion

I am concerned that most of the “debate” surrounding an ageing population seems to be an inability (or refusal) to see changes as a transition rather than a crisis. Lee Kuan Yew said, “Less young people means less sales of new cars, new stereos, new computers, new iPhones, iPads, new clothes, and fine dining.”[11] But I am not sure if he understands that this is merely an economy in transition, with consumption patterns changing such that we will instead see more golf clubs, more smart elderly-friendly technology (such as mobility devices), more leisure and recreation, more Internet shopping, more spending by grandparents on grandchildren, etc.

Instead of trying to fight an ageing population, perhaps this Government should instead focus its energy on making Singapore more elderly-friendly, making the economy more responsive to the demands of a changing and ageing local and international economy, and making it easier to capture and enhance the benefits of an ageing population.


[1] http://www.tai.org.au/documents/dp_fulltext/DP63.pdf, p. ix

[2] http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/pubdocs/2011/34/en/1/EF1134EN.pdf, pp. 14-16

[3] http://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/files/jrf/sp110.pdf, p. 2

[4] http://www.tai.org.au/documents/dp_fulltext/DP63.pdf, p. ix

[5] http://edition.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/12/20/crime.statistics/index.html

[6] http://www.cscscc.gc.ca/text/pblct/forum/e123/123h_e.pdf, p. 30

[7] http://www.3news.co.nz/Reducedcrimeratethankstoageingpopulationsaysprofessor/tabid/423/articleID/228141/Default.aspx

[8] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/7295954/Wearehappiestat-74-saysnewreport.html

[9] http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/01/health/research/01happy.html

[10] http://www.economist.com/node/17722567

[11] http://www.todayonline.com/Singapore/EDC120204-0000041/Singaporeneedstoacceptimmigrants


Part 1, Part 2, Part 3.

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

售卖香烟给未成年者 10商家被吊照半年

卫生科学局指出,10家零售商因卖出香烟给未满18岁的人士,被吊销“烟草零售执照”长达半年。 据当局所发出的文告指出,自2019年8月至今年6月期间,当局已经对10家零售商业者展开执法行动,即吊销他们的零售烟草执照长达半年。 当局强调,绝对不会滥用有关执照的零售商手软,并提醒其他业者,必须对零售店内的烟草产品交易即雇员的行为负责。“若只是凭着买方外表来评估年龄,则是冒险行为。” 据《烟草(广告与销售控制)法案》,任何出售烟草产品给未成年者,一旦定罪将被罚款不超过5000元,再犯则罚款不超过一万元。此外,初犯者将被吊销烟草销售执照达半年,再犯则直接被吊销。但是,若零售商出售烟草产品给穿着校服的学生,或12岁以下的未成年人士,即使是初犯,烟草零售执照也将直接被吊销。 自2015年至今,当局已经吊销了102家烟草零售商的执照,还有16家零售商执照被永久撤销。 另一方面,自今年1月起,我国可购买香烟和吸烟的法定年龄调升至20岁,并逐年提高。即表示,在来年,即2021年,可吸烟和购买香烟的法定年龄定在21岁。

Education Minister explains MOE’s reasoning for reopening schools in Singapore amid COVID-19 outbreak

In response to parents’ worries of reopening schools on Monday (23 March),…

Mexican mayor weds alligator for prosperity

San Pedro Huamelula’s mayor marries a 7-year-old female caiman alligator, considered a deity, in an age-old traditional ceremony believed to bring prosperity to their community in Mexico.