~by: Ghui ~

Yaw Shin Leong has been expelled from the Workers’ Party with immediate effect. In one foul swoop, he has lost both his place in a party he helped propel into victory and his role as an MP. For the foreseeable future, his political career is well and truly over.

At first blush, this move seems drastic and disproportionate. While Yaw may have appeared less than forthcoming in the allegations of marital affairs that have been levelled against him, we must remember that these alleged offenses are of a private nature. We must draw a line between duties owed to the state and duties owed to the family. As long as his duties as MP have not been compromised, that line must remain firmly in place.

However, given that the political game has been pushed up several notches post GE 2011, this is perhaps a very strategic move on the part of the Workers’ Party.

There have been many scandals of late. Accusations of corruption and a lack of accountability on the part of people in power have been rife. Singaporeans are more vocal than ever before and are crying out for blood. This is of course a positive thing but we must distinguish between necessary accountability and irrelevant information digging. 

This whole saga seems to have highlighted confusion between what is in the public interest and what should remain the private business of individuals. I am not condoning affairs but I do see a difference between private morality and public culpability.

However, I do applaud the Workers’ Party for its strategic ingenuity. Certainly, they have gauged public sentiment correctly in a way that the PAP has failed to do for many years. They have sent a very strong message to voters that it is their opinion that counts. In this, they have deferred to the public and have showed respect for the views of Singaporeans at large. The PAP on the other hand, has been perceived to protect its own and this is something that has not sat well with the public. The contrast is therefore very stark and can only serve to strengthen the Workers’ Party’s image in the eyes of Singaporeans.

Politicians have to be seen to serve public interest and public interest has deemed it fit to view Yaw’s actions as something that is incompatible with his duties as an MP. The Workers’ Party has picked up on this public sentiment and has moved to act against one of its own. In so doing, the Workers’ Party has certainly shown great political judgment and acumen. In a democracy, it is what the voters want that counts and the Workers’ Party has demonstrated where its loyalty lies. No one is indispensable or untouchable.

The political landscape has truly heated up. Unfortunately, Yaw may have been made the unwitting scapegoat for accountability.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Charging for tap water – is it justifiable?

G Hui Singapore is an island surrounded by water. Rainfall is plentiful…

People’s Voice chief Lim Tean slams Lawrence Wong and 4G leaders for “incompetence” in handling the COVID-19 crisis

“Lawrence Wong has become synonymous with the incompetence of the so called…

不满未全文刊载驻美大使投书 我媒体政策司长抨击《华邮》“让虚假指控延续”

短短三周内,财政部、内政部、人力部和教育部,都透过防假消息法办事处,向在野党人物和时事网站管理人,发出更正指示。 社交媒体平台脸书(Facebook),此前也被新加坡政府要求对时政新闻网State Times Review(简称ST Review)的贴文发出更正声明。 对此,美国《华盛顿邮报》记者凯特(Cat Zakrzewki)在本月2日也作出跟进报导,指这是美国科技公司首次被要求遵循新加坡《防假消息法》,其中引述脸书发言人安迪·斯通(Andy Stone)言论:“我们希望新加坡政府保障不会影响言论自由,且有条理和透明落实该法。” 该报导也采访了人权观察组织亚洲区副主任罗伯逊(Phil Robertson),后者抨击《防假消息法》似乎旨在让那些如脸书等互联网公司,必须遵守这些滥用权利的法令,巨额罚款乃至可能入狱,都可能使得任何一家媒体公司都很难不遵守该法。 狮城驻美大使:新加坡更易面对假消息风险 不过该文章也涵括两段来自新加坡驻美大使米尔普里的言论。后者是投书到该报,阐述《防假消息法》实则在保障新加坡免于假消息的风险。…

Minimum Legal Age for tobacco raised to 19 years old from 1 January 2019

The Minimum Legal Age (MLA) for the purchase, use, possession, sale and…