~Editorial~

It was the move that no one was expecting, and understandably so.

Mr Yaw Shin Leong’s sacking from the Worker’s Party is an unparalleled move in modern Singapore’s political history.

It also has the potential to be remembered by posterity as a masterstroke, and might just allow the WP to lay claim to the image of being “whiter than white”.

Expelling a sitting Member of Parliament who has been part of the WP leadership for nearly a decade and precipitating a by-election speaks volumes more than any amount of press statements or half apologies.

The WP’s move has sent the clearest possible signal that the Party’s belief in transparency and accountability is much more than an election slogan.

TOC warned in an editorial just days ago that “the stench of silence in the face of sleaze will continue to fester”. The WP leadership, seemingly unable to get the information out of Mr Yaw that would allow it to account thoroughly to the public, moved quickly to lance the boil.

Henceforth, when the WP calls the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) to account, the WP will have a reservoir of moral authority to draw on.

With several high flying members of the civil service under investigation for potentially illegal behavior, there is probably no better time to for the WP to start using their newfound moral high ground to put the ruling Party’s feet to the fire. 

The ruling Party needs to move swiftly to give a full accounting to the public of the investigations into the former SCDF and CNB heads. They now also need to address the scandal of two expatriates involved in the violent Suntec assault being allowed to waltz out of Singapore.

If the PAP is able to demonstrate the same humility, contrition and swift action the WP has displayed, they might yet level the playing field of moral authority.

But it should not be a surprise if the voters of Hougang ratify Mr Low's move with a majority for whoever the WP selects to contest in Hougang. By axing his protege whom he painstakingly cultivated through the years, Mr Low has made the ultimate sacrifice to show that no one person is more important than the Party's brand.

It will be an uphill task for the PAP to dislodge the WP in Hougang.

Finally, one unintended effect of the WP’s move is that it now turns the tables on the mainstream media (MSM).

After a thoroughly zealous and undignified hounding of Mr Yaw and pious preaching at the WP’s leadership, the MSM will now be the objects of universal disgrace if they do not demonstrate consistency in their scrutiny of all politicians and political parties. While no political party, including the PAP, has sought to exploit Mr Yaw’s public humiliation for political gain, the same cannot be said for the press.

Will the sanctimonious MSM now set its’ newfound investigative sights on the ranks of the PAP?

We’re not holding our breath.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

NEA reports an increase of dengue cases over the past three consecutive weeks

The number of dengue cases has increased over the past three consecutive…

人权观察组织抨击 新加坡言论自由进一步收紧

人权观察组织(HRW)于昨日发文告,抨击新加坡政府对国内原已受限的言论自由,施加更多的钳制。 文告提及去年10月生效的《防假消息法》,让我国部长可以宣布某个网络贴文为“假消息”,并发出指示要求更正。若不遵从可招致刑事惩处。 人权观察亚洲区副主任菲尔.罗宾逊(Phil Robertson)批评,新加坡长期来不容忍言论自由,而有关防假消息法恐将用以让异议人士沉默。仅仅是该法的存在,就足以让那些网络异议自我审查。 去年11月下旬,前进党毕博渊(Brad Bowyer)成为《首位被政府援引上述法令,要求更正贴文的人士。紧接着,包括来自澳洲的脸书专页State Times Review(STR)、新加坡民主党和人民之声党领袖林鼎律师,都相续被相关部门要求更正网络贴文。 此外,文告抨击新加坡当局也用现有法律来惩罚参与和平表达异见或参与集会者,诸如社运份子、律师、网络媒体都面对检控、刑事诉讼等,例如范国瀚和民主党党要陈两裕,因为脸书贴文于去年10月被判藐视法庭罪成立。 文告也提及本社总编许渊臣,因为一篇文章被总理李显龙以诽谤罪起诉。 再者,范国瀚在2016年曾邀请邀请香港“黄雨伞运动”中的学运领袖黄之锋,透过Skype与现场观众连线对谈交流。但活动被指是无准证集会,结果被罚2000元或10日监禁。加之拒绝签口供,合共被罚款3200元。 此外,文告批评我国仍保留死刑、处刑期限也缺乏透明;去年7月有近10位囚犯的特赦申请被新加坡总统驳回,震惊律师界。…

Clear signal that everyone matters – Josephine Teo

“On the first day of Chinese New Year, at six o’clock in…

工人党林志蔚更新工作情况 除了筹备市镇会也积极走访居民!

大选刚落幕,各选区议员也开始马不停蹄地工作,在新划分盛港集选区,工人党候任议员团队除了目前还在准备交接市镇会工作,各议员也开始走访社区,了解人民需求。 盛港集选区议员之一林志蔚,今日(20日)在脸书上更新目前的状况,除了忙于盛港集选区市镇会筹备工作,目前仍在四处走访。 “经过实地考察,我们更能理解如今人民的需求和关切,并为他们提供更好的服务。因此本周除了我们忙于交接市镇会工作,团队也花了时间和居民见面,走访不同社区。” 物色会见居民活动地点 他也表示,自己和盛港安谷(Anchorvale)的居民会面,并评估了社区条件,物色两个适合办理会见选民活动的地点,即在308A和330A的组屋底层,因他们地点适中便利,也接近同港和农道(Farmway)轻轨站。 他也表示尽管如今在第二阶段解禁,仍不能进行面对面选民见面会,但自己每周会在这两处走访,也可能会走更远的地方,或是接收居民在线上的反馈。 “我会每周在这两点走访,几周后可能会往更北边。我也会往更南方走访,反之亦然。虽然在第二阶段解封措施还未完全解除前,我们无法举办实地的选民见面会,但也开始收到许多选民的线上反馈,并期待与选民面对面讨论。”