~by: Siew Kum Hong~

According to the Heritage Foundation, Singapore has the second freest economy in the world (after Hong Kong). But there is one aspect of Singapore that has always felt to me like a command economy: the way the Government tries to calibrate supply and demand in higher education.

On 8 February, the TODAY newspaper reported that further education was hotly-discussed when Minister of State for Education Mr Lawrence Wong conducted a dialogue with around 100 ITE students. Some ITE students asked about the possibility of increasing the number of polytechnic places available to them after graduating from ITE.

This is what TODAY reported:

“Mr Wong said he understood their aspirations but not everyone would be able to pursue a diploma at a polytechnic immediately after obtaining their Higher NITEC.

This was due to limited places at local polytechnics and employers' demand for ITE graduates. "If everyone can move up, we will not have enough ITE graduates out there in the workforce," he said.

"At the end, it's the number of places we can provide … I don't think we'll be able to satisfy everyone, frankly," he said.”

MOS Wong also warned against a situation of too many degree- and diploma-holders seeking jobs, citing the example of the Singapore embassy in Paris, who had received only applications from degree-holders for a receptionist job. He also went on to explain that ITE was a foundation for polytechnic education, and hence ITE graduates would not be allowed to apply for polytechnic courses unrelated to their areas of study.

As Mr Brown put it on Facebook:

“Translation: “If we allow everyone to be well-educated, who will be the serfs?””

This is the sort of misguided social engineering that leaves a bad taste in many Singaporeans’ mouths. It stems from a fundamentally-misconceived view of higher education as being a means to the end of creating people to fill the jobs out there. And mind you, the sort of logic has been applied in the past, to limit the number of polytechnic graduates who are allowed to pursue undergraduate courses in our universities.

Never mind that the Government has a poor record at central planning with higher education to guide Singaporeans towards, or to deter or exclude Singaporeans from, this or that sector. Witness the shortage of lawyers in recent years. Witness also the angst of biotechnology graduates today, who were induced to enter that course of study by the heavy promotion by the Government, only to find that a basic biotechnology degree was, to paraphrase Mr Philip Yeo, only good enough for washing test-tubes.

Never mind that nowadays, most people view education as being at least as much about self-actualisation. Viewing higher education solely in terms of an assembly line for workers is nothing less than anachronistic.

Never mind that education is almost universally recognized as one of the key drivers of social mobility, and this message tells ITE graduates that they need to look for another way – besides education — to do better in life.

Never mind that deliberately limiting the number of places available to ITE graduates, effectively imposes an artificial restriction on how far ITE graduates can go in their education. Don’t we pride ourselves in meritocracy? Where is the meritocracy in not allowing those ITE graduates who are good enough for polytechnics, to enter them?

Never mind that an education is meant to equip one for life, while the jobs out there today will not be the jobs available in 10 years’ time. Without giving ITE graduates who want to do so, the opportunity to equip themselves with skills going beyond today’s jobs, the Government may be deliberately disadvantaging ITE graduates for years into the future, if not for life.

Never mind that even if ITE graduates are not allowed to enter polytechnics, many will still pursue part-time private courses at their own expense.

Never mind that a diploma-holder who is good will succeed, while a diploma-holder who is not good will not succeed. And that is regardless of whether or not that diploma-holder entered the polytechnic after graduating from ITE, JC or secondary school.

Never mind that the Paris embassy example cited by MOS Wong is not at all analogous. France is experiencing economic troubles including very high unemployment, which is the more likely reason why degree-holders are applying for the receptionist job. Correlation does not mean causation, and the fact that degree-holders are applying for the receptionist job does not prove that there are too many degree-holders in France.

Never mind that polytechnic courses are varied enough that there will be some, if not many, courses that ITE, JCs and secondary schools do not prepare students for. In which case, why restrict only ITE graduates, but not JC or secondary school graduates, from applying for such courses?

Sorry Mr Wong. It’s not just ITE students who disagree with you. I would hazard that most Singaporeans would also be disappointed with these comments. In our hearts, we want all Singaporeans to have equal opportunities, and to support those Singaporeans in going as far as they can. There actually are Singaporeans who truly believe that every Singaporean really does count.


Editor's note:  Minister of State for Education Lawrence Wong has since posted on his Facebook that his comment, “if everyone can move up, we will not have enough ITE graduates out there in the workforce”, has been taken 'out of context'.

See his Facebook comment HERE.


This article first appeared on Siew Kum Hong's blog.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

MOH announced 16 new cases of locally transmitted Zika virus infection

The Ministry of Health (MOH) and the National Environment Agency (NEA) stated…

PM on workforce "cultural change" – more answers needed

By Ismail Malek PM Lee delivered a good speech at NDR 2014. It…

Elderly should be given options to access Govt’ services over the counter as many of them struggle to use digital tools, says WP’s Sylvia Lim

The elderly should be given the options to access the Government services…

居民忧杜佛森林被开发 李智陞:保育绿地或发展不仓促决定

国家发展部长李智陞表示,在规划乌鲁班丹时,政府也有相同的考量,在保留大自然空间和为国人建造未来家园之间取得平衡。 日前,政府宣布计划明年在乌鲁班丹、芽笼、比达达利、登加、兀兰等多个地区推出约1万7000间预购组屋单位供买家申购。 也有居民和环保份子担忧,杜佛森林可能被开发作为住宅区。 对此,李智陞在与国家公园局人员、新加坡自然协会会长林肖恩、关注生态多样性的本地青年组织“Singapore Youth Voices for Biodiversity”联合创办人方俊强等人,走访乌鲁班丹后,在脸书上 发表相关意见。 他表示,无论是保留自然空间,或是未来建造住宅都是重要的需求,不应该仓促做决定。 因此,当局也会在规划时考量各方意见,包括居民、环保分子、购房者等人。 此前建屋局的环境基准报告显示,杜佛森林含有丰富的生态,包括120种植物与158物种,包括飞禽、蜥蜴、两栖类、哺乳动物、昆虫与蜗牛的栖息地,其中涵盖了不乏濒危动植物。…