~by: Siew Kum Hong~

According to the Heritage Foundation, Singapore has the second freest economy in the world (after Hong Kong). But there is one aspect of Singapore that has always felt to me like a command economy: the way the Government tries to calibrate supply and demand in higher education.

On 8 February, the TODAY newspaper reported that further education was hotly-discussed when Minister of State for Education Mr Lawrence Wong conducted a dialogue with around 100 ITE students. Some ITE students asked about the possibility of increasing the number of polytechnic places available to them after graduating from ITE.

This is what TODAY reported:

“Mr Wong said he understood their aspirations but not everyone would be able to pursue a diploma at a polytechnic immediately after obtaining their Higher NITEC.

This was due to limited places at local polytechnics and employers' demand for ITE graduates. "If everyone can move up, we will not have enough ITE graduates out there in the workforce," he said.

"At the end, it's the number of places we can provide … I don't think we'll be able to satisfy everyone, frankly," he said.”

MOS Wong also warned against a situation of too many degree- and diploma-holders seeking jobs, citing the example of the Singapore embassy in Paris, who had received only applications from degree-holders for a receptionist job. He also went on to explain that ITE was a foundation for polytechnic education, and hence ITE graduates would not be allowed to apply for polytechnic courses unrelated to their areas of study.

As Mr Brown put it on Facebook:

“Translation: “If we allow everyone to be well-educated, who will be the serfs?””

This is the sort of misguided social engineering that leaves a bad taste in many Singaporeans’ mouths. It stems from a fundamentally-misconceived view of higher education as being a means to the end of creating people to fill the jobs out there. And mind you, the sort of logic has been applied in the past, to limit the number of polytechnic graduates who are allowed to pursue undergraduate courses in our universities.

Never mind that the Government has a poor record at central planning with higher education to guide Singaporeans towards, or to deter or exclude Singaporeans from, this or that sector. Witness the shortage of lawyers in recent years. Witness also the angst of biotechnology graduates today, who were induced to enter that course of study by the heavy promotion by the Government, only to find that a basic biotechnology degree was, to paraphrase Mr Philip Yeo, only good enough for washing test-tubes.

Never mind that nowadays, most people view education as being at least as much about self-actualisation. Viewing higher education solely in terms of an assembly line for workers is nothing less than anachronistic.

Never mind that education is almost universally recognized as one of the key drivers of social mobility, and this message tells ITE graduates that they need to look for another way – besides education — to do better in life.

Never mind that deliberately limiting the number of places available to ITE graduates, effectively imposes an artificial restriction on how far ITE graduates can go in their education. Don’t we pride ourselves in meritocracy? Where is the meritocracy in not allowing those ITE graduates who are good enough for polytechnics, to enter them?

Never mind that an education is meant to equip one for life, while the jobs out there today will not be the jobs available in 10 years’ time. Without giving ITE graduates who want to do so, the opportunity to equip themselves with skills going beyond today’s jobs, the Government may be deliberately disadvantaging ITE graduates for years into the future, if not for life.

Never mind that even if ITE graduates are not allowed to enter polytechnics, many will still pursue part-time private courses at their own expense.

Never mind that a diploma-holder who is good will succeed, while a diploma-holder who is not good will not succeed. And that is regardless of whether or not that diploma-holder entered the polytechnic after graduating from ITE, JC or secondary school.

Never mind that the Paris embassy example cited by MOS Wong is not at all analogous. France is experiencing economic troubles including very high unemployment, which is the more likely reason why degree-holders are applying for the receptionist job. Correlation does not mean causation, and the fact that degree-holders are applying for the receptionist job does not prove that there are too many degree-holders in France.

Never mind that polytechnic courses are varied enough that there will be some, if not many, courses that ITE, JCs and secondary schools do not prepare students for. In which case, why restrict only ITE graduates, but not JC or secondary school graduates, from applying for such courses?

Sorry Mr Wong. It’s not just ITE students who disagree with you. I would hazard that most Singaporeans would also be disappointed with these comments. In our hearts, we want all Singaporeans to have equal opportunities, and to support those Singaporeans in going as far as they can. There actually are Singaporeans who truly believe that every Singaporean really does count.


Editor's note:  Minister of State for Education Lawrence Wong has since posted on his Facebook that his comment, “if everyone can move up, we will not have enough ITE graduates out there in the workforce”, has been taken 'out of context'.

See his Facebook comment HERE.


This article first appeared on Siew Kum Hong's blog.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

口福集团子公司不再续约 裕廊西小贩中心8月暂关闭

口福集团昨日宣布,基于裕廊西小贩中心生意惨淡,其旗下子公司将在8月约满后,不再续约管理。 口福集团昨日发文告宣布,子公司Hawker Management将不续约管理裕廊西小贩中心,并且会和环境局合作,协助让现有摊贩搬迁到环境局的小贩中心、巴刹,或口福的食阁或咖啡店。集团也表示,摊贩们可以免缴付从6月至租约满期的租金,并提供合格摊贩1000元的搬迁费。 口福集团子公司的管理合约为期三年,将于今年8月6日届满。 当局表示是以社会企业模式经营裕廊西小贩中心,投入了所有资源,岂知效果不理想。为了维护股东和公司利益,经过内部讨论以及和环境局的商议后,决定在约满后退出。 国家环境局指出,随着口福集团的宣布,裕廊西小贩中心估计将会会关闭至2021年下半年。 当局将会向其他业者征求发展方案计划书,并且协助不想继续营业的摊贩转行,为有经济困难的摊贩提供财务援助。 当局指出,裕廊西小贩中心的人流量和租用率在疫情爆发前,就已经偏低,因此除了征求发展方案计划书,环境局也会征求民众的意见和建议,并且可能动工翻新小贩中心,改善布局后,再邀请现有的小贩回来。

TOC apologises to Ms Stephanie Chok

TOC responds to Alex Au’s blog post.

Parent files police report of alleged child abuse by teacher at Sparkletots preschool

Police are investigating the mishandling of a child that allegedly happened at…