~by: Ravi Philemon~

With the passing away of Dr Toh Chin Chye, many have come forward to express gratitude for his immense contribution to the country. Some from the opposition and the civil society also have expressed their admiration for him.

Mr Chiam See Tong for example paid tribute to him saying, "I admire Dr Toh for how he fought for the independence of Singapore from the British, and then helped our country to move forward after our separation from Malaysia. He was the epitome of dedication to and sacrifice for public service, and will be remembered as one of Singapore’s key founding fathers."

Think Centre, a human rights NGO said, " The Singapore that we and future generations know in history, whom live comfortably in and runs efficiently of today and tomorrow, could not have materialised without Dr Toh Chin Chye's dare to challenge and progressive spirit and doing", in paying tribute to Dr Toh.

Even the Singapore Democratic Party, which is rarely sympathetic with anything PAP, expressed their condolences to the family of Dr Toh Chin Chye.

But while we remember and appreciate Dr Toh for his many contributions to the nation, we must not forget that he was only human, which means that there were shades of grey which must be talked about, in remembering the man.

For example, in 1974, when Dr Toh was the Vice-Chancellor of Singapore University, immigration officers accompanied by riot police conducted a pre-dawn raid at the university's campus, detaining and deporting six students who were active in the University's student union.

This action was in contrast to what Dr Toh said in his national day message on 3 August 1987, to his constituents in Rochore. 

In his message to the Rochore residents, Dr Toh lamented that after 30 years, Singapore could still not tolerate dissenting voice. In recalling that he was a dissident once with some others in the PAP, he said that he worked 'hand-in-hand' with the communists and the Marxists.

When he said that he himself had read Marx, it warranted a reply from Lim Boon Heng, who said, "As far as I know, the young Dr Toh never advocated a Marxist state, nor the classless society", because that statement by Dr Toh, seemed to imply that he was sympathetic to the alleged Marxist Conspirators (or perhaps even believed that they were no conspirators) , who were detained by the government of Singapore in May 1987.

Another noteworthy incident is, in September 1979, Dr Toh advocated that schizophrenics be sterilised, as he said that that was the only way to prevent schizophrenia from being inherited.

Being an academic, Dr Toh had probably referred to the studies of Gottesman and Shields and Heston to come to the conclusion that there is a genetic link for schizophrenia, and because he believed in improving the genetic composition of the population, he advocated it.

The Singapore Medical Association was swift in cautioning against this advocacy for sterilisation by Dr Toh. SMA said that sterilisation for schizophrenics should be voluntary and that they should not be cajoled or coaxed into it.

A prominent psychiatrist also spoke up against this proposed initiative of Dr Toh saying that the degree of schizophrenia varied from case to case and that there had been cases where the patients had totally recovered. To deny anyone the opportunity of fathering or mothering a child is in itself an added 'burden' which could increase the schizophrenics' suffering, the psychiatrist cautioned, and added, "to deny these people the right to father is not right".

But Dr Toh was not the only one from his generation of leaders to hold to this belief of improving the gene pool of Singaporeans by discouraging reproduction by persons presumed genetic defects, or of having inheritable undesirable traits.

Mr Lee Kuan Yew too held to this belief. And this belief was the reason for the anti-natalist 'Stop at Two' policy of the PAP government in the early 60s and 70s; and the Graduate Mothers' Scheme, mooted in 1984.

This belief in the superior gene pool also gives rise to the belief in racial superiority.

Speaking at a Chinese New Year celebration, Mr Lee Kuan Yew had said, Singaporeans should accept immigrants or " the population of Chinese Singaporeans in the next generation, 18 to 20 years, will half".

One need not be surprised that Mr Lee said this because Mr Lee's belief in racial superiority is not new:

"Three women were brought to the Singapore General Hospital, each in the same condition and needing a blood transfusion. The first, a Southeast Asian was given the transfusion but died a few hours later. The second, a South Asian was also given a transfusion but died a few days later. The third, an East Asian, was given a transfusion and survived. That is the X factor in development." – Mr Lee Kuan Yew (27 December 1967)

History tells us that there were at least two occasions where Mr Lee wanted to resign as Prime Minister, and that Dr Toh could have chosen to become the PM if he had wanted to.

Would we have seen a different Lee Kuan Yew and a different Toh Chin Chye if the roles had been reversed and Lee Kuan Yew was made to step down from the cabinet earlier for the political renewal process, instead of Dr Toh?

It was Lee Kuan Yew after all who had said as an opposition leader in 1956:

"Repression, Sir is a habit that grows. I am told it is like making love-it is always easier the second time! The first time there may be pangs of conscience, a sense of guilt. But once embarked on this course with constant repetition you get more and more brazen in the attack. All you have to do is to dissolve organizations and societies and banish and detain the key political workers in these societies. Then miraculously everything is tranquil on the surface. Then an intimidated press and the government-controlled radio together can regularly sing your praises, and slowly and steadily the people are made to forget the evil things that have already been done, or if these things are referred to again they're conveniently distorted and distorted with impunity, because there will be no opposition to contradict." 

One must not forget that Mr Lee Kuan Yew and Dr Toh Chin Chye were cut from the same cloth, in trying to lionise Dr Toh Chin Chye. 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

针对诉求和反馈 普杰立:必要时公开事主个资避免误导民众

针对本社之前报导,一名患红斑狼疮的单亲妈妈申请公积金遭拒一事,政府当局有话说,认为本社应该公开部分个人资料,如真实姓名,以方便查询和跟进,也可避免误导民众。 交通部兼通讯及新闻部高级政务部长普杰立医生,周一(2月3日)在国会指出,若接获公开投诉或请愿,政府会公开部分的相关个人资料,不会全部都公布出来。 特斯拉副教授询问政府,在避免泄漏太多个人隐私的前提下,当局是否根据实际情况公布投诉,或申诉事主的个人信息。 普杰立回答,公布个人信息,主要是让有关机构能够避免引起争议或误解,且所公布的信息也会非常具体,让相关人士掌握更为全面的信息,甚至在必要时能够质疑政府的说法。 需要时公开部分资料 他表示,虽然有些公开投诉是匿名进行,但是政府还是在需要时公布部分资料,如投诉者身份,以便减少政府在陈述事实时出现任何模糊不清的情况,也能够减少民众的猜疑。 “当投诉存在不准确性,政府必须做出纠正,提供准确信息,这样除了能够维护政府的公信力之外,也能有效地为民服务。” “若民众被误导了,可能会引起他们忧虑,甚至会根据错误信息采取行动,做出不利于自己的决定。” 他们是针对本社于去年12月17日作出的报导,指一名患有红斑狼疮的单亲妈妈因为病情待业多年,因而申请领出公积金以养活家人,却遭拒绝的事件。 主流媒体亦未提及蔡女士真名 事实上,并非只有本社做出了有关报导,《新明日报》也报导了相关新闻,并且还有跟进新闻,然而该社首次做出的报导用了“蔡女士”,第二次用的报导则跟随本社使用了“蔡莉莉”(译音)。 公积金局事后曾做出澄清,公开了当事人的姓名和求医详情,更指有关报导不够全面。文告中指出,已有数个政府机构都积极提供协助了,报导中却没有提到,并且在报导新闻时使用假名。…

行动党15市镇会下月起 禁PMD在组屋底层和公共走廊使用

据了解,从下月1日起,人民行动党15个市镇理事会将禁止所有个人代步工具在组屋底层和公共走廊使用。 人民行动党市镇会协调主席张俰宾博士,在今日(7日)发文告声称,市镇会已经检讨已有条例(bylaw),一旦获得新加坡总检察署批准后,将实行新禁令。 有鉴于个人代步工具(PMD)事故频发,包括陆路交通局等各造也着手管制PMD。 在前日的国会上,交通部兼卫生部高级政务部长蓝彬明指出,许多国人依赖PMD出行和维持生计,但是在前两年(2017和2018年)涉及PMD的公共路径事故就多达228宗,而今年上半年也爆发了49宗涉及PMD的火患,所以采取提前措施是有必要的。 明年4月起,所有新的电动踏板车,都必须通过UL2272标准认证检查,并确保重量、宽度和车速符合规格,才能注册使用。 陆交局因电动踏板车火警事件频传,自上个月规定必须注册后,昨日宣布将强制电动个人代步工具(简称PMD)符合UL2272标准的措施提前半年实行,所有个人代步工具必须在明年7月起达到有关防火标准。 上个月起,陆交局已强制电动踏板车进行注册,惟至今已经注册的9万辆电动踏板车中,有将近九成不符合UL2272的安全标准。 相关的电动踏板车原定于2021年起就会自动注销注册,不能再公开使用了。 他指出,当局将UL2272期限提前半年,主要认为这是最早能做到的合理期限,也让零售商有更多时间引进拥有UL2272防火标准认证的足够货源。

感谢各位读者支持

各位网络公民的读者们好, 本社在日前公布,为了应付选举期间的运营开销,本社将在7月6日(星期六),傍晚6时30分至9时,在新置地大厦(Singapore Land Tower)第45层顶层阁楼,举办募款晚宴。 感谢各位读者厚爱,消息宣布后有许多热心群众和支持者联系我们,并表示尽管无法出席7月6日的晚宴,但很乐意捐款支持。 为了能筹募资金,我们再次展开募款活动,我们也预计选举很可能在未来几个月内举行。 而群众们的善款,将用于支持本社英语和中文独立新闻网站的运营,希望能藉此继续为读者们提供独立、主流媒体忽略的报导和视野。 如仍有善长仁翁有意捐献,您可选择通过银行转帐到我们以下任何一个账户: Maybank 户口:04011108619 Paynow账户: 201543138DTOC…

Trade off for growth not at expense of Singaporeans: SPP on PM’s National Day Rally speech

National growth should not be done at the expense of jobs for…