~by: Dr Wong Wee Nam~

I cannot forget his kind gesture. It was the morning after the 1997 General Election. I had come back at 2 am after the results had been announced that my team had lost. I went straight to bed. At 8 am, the phone rang and woke me up. At the other end was the familiar voice of Dr Toh Chin Chye.

For the next 45 minutes, he consoled me, gave a lot of encouraging words, and suggested some ideas for the way forward.

It was really thoughtful of him. After all, who was I that the founding chairman of the PAP should call me up and console me? It further confirmed my impression of him — a very down-to-earth man, with no airs. When he shared an opinion, he would do so as an equal and not as a hectoring lecturer. This is quite unlike many minions of the party whom I know who have always boasted that they could give me tuition on how to fight elections.

When I was in primary school, I had already heard of Dr Toh Chin Chye. This was because he was representing Rochor, a constituency adjacent to the place I grew up. Furthermore, there was the epic battle between him and the chairman of Barisan Sosialis, Dr Lee Siew Choh, where he won by a mere 89 votes. This had generated a lot of discussions in coffeeshops.

However, it was not until I went to University and he became the Vice-Chancellor that we met. When he was first posted to the University, there was some disquiet amongst the university community. Why was a minister of the ruling party, especially a party that had introduced the suitability certificate, sent to be the head of the University?

His appointment prompted me to write an article to the student’s satirical newspaper, The Yakkity Yak. After the publication, I had expected a call from the university administration but none came. Dr Toh was not as intolerant as we thought he would be. The fact that he had even put up with the rebellious Professor Enright said a lot about him.

Once, a madcap student ran round the corridor below the Administration block and bumped into Dr Toh who was walking to his office. The diminutive Dr Toh was sent flying down with a crash. The student’s face turned green. However, Dr Toh just got up, picked up his briefcase, nodded to the student and carried on walking. He might have been stern but he accepted people.

In subsequent meetings with him, I found him to be a very open and forthright person. He would not evade difficult and embarrassing questions and would give straight and honest answers on politics, policies, his government’s authoritarianism and even his working relationship with his colleagues. Never did he try to impose his arguments on others by speaking down to them.

Thus he would not blindly defend any position but would want you to see the difficulty of a position. He would then go on to explore the problem patiently, sometimes taking more than half an hour to do so and explain the rationale behind his thinking. It was not tiresome to listen to him because his thoughts were clear and his reasoning logical.

In my experience with him, there was not the short fuse that he was reputed to have. Even when he had to put someone down, he did so with finesse. Once, a friend asked him what it would be like to meet Lee Kuan Yew. Dr Toh in his soft voice gently told him, “Lee Kuan Yew doesn’t suffer fools gladly.” In the course of the conversation, this friend had clearly irritated him by his inconsistencies and flip-flopping of opinions.

His reading of people was uncanny. There was one occasion I had lunch with him and two other friends to tap his expertise on contesting the 1997 General Election. Towards the end of the lunch, he turned to the most vocal celebrity and told him straight, “The other two have already teed off and you still have not put your ball down.”

People often commented that Dr Toh was a bitter man after he left the PAP and that was why he often spoke out against them. As far as I know, he did not come across to me as such a person. To me, he had never attacked any of his old comrades and when he spoke out against certain policies, it was not because he was bitter but because he sincerely felt they were, in principle, wrong. And he would go at length to explain why.

Neither did he run down those political opponents of the PAP like J.B. Jeyaretnam and Dr Chee Soon Juan. To him, they had every right to be in politics. He also had great admiration for the late Lim Chin Siong. The moment he started speaking, Dr Toh recalled, the crowd would go into frenzy. That was Lim’s impressive oratorical skill.

Thus when he went round meeting politicians of all shades and colours, his intention was not to overthrow or inflict vengeance on a party he had founded. Politics was in his blood and he just loved and enjoyed a good political discussion with anyone.

To Dr Toh, politics is about principles and should not be personal. For him, it was not that we were of different political persuasions but that we were speaking with different voices for Singapore. It is this that reminds us of the founding spirit of Singapore.

In my years of association with him, I found him a storehouse of political wisdom.

“To be a politician, you must think and feel like a businessman.”

“When you corner a person, give him a way out. Even a rat will turn and bite you if there is no way to run,” are some of the political gems.

I once paid him a visit and he printed a copy of an article from a Fish Farm Forum for me. The article had nothing to do with the fishing industry but was a critical analysis of the ministerial salary when it was first introduced. That is Dr Toh for you — keeping abreast and always willing to share.

He might be a national leader but he could be very comfortable on the ground. He once went to a friend’s office to taste his wine. My friend told him that he should not have gone there because the office was an abattoir and the stench was terrible. He told my friend it was alright and it was good to try and taste wine in any surroundings.

Dr Toh Chin Chye might have been a stern man but he was a nice person. This is a man who is known to be calm under critical conditions. We should be thankful to him for his great captaincy, especially during the turbulent times with Malaysia.

Dr Toh, may you rest in peace. 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

出错即被打骂、用刀鞋踢! 本地退役滑冰选手爆在中训练期间遭虐行

续各国运动员爆出受训时遭受身体和精神虐待,本地花样滑冰退役选手于书然(Jessica Shuran Yu),也勇敢站出来披露,自己在中国训练期间,亦曾遭受被踢、被打,以及语言侮辱等不当待遇。 于书然在两天前的一篇Instagram贴文,指出一些事令她难以启齿,至今都令她害怕,但感谢许多勇敢的女选手们挺身而出,令她意识到有必要说出来。 她透露,自11岁开始,便开始遭受身体和精神上的虐待。不仅言语上以“懒惰”、“笨蛋”、“白痴”、“废物”等具侮辱性词语羞辱她,她也必须承受来自教练的殴打。 “当他发脾气时,即使是很小的过错,他也会要我伸手受罚。如果他生很大的气,我会连续被打十几次,直到破皮。” 不仅如此,于书然也爆出教练曾使用冰鞋踢她小腿,导致他受伤流血,但即便如此,她仍必须立即投入训练,不能让教练看见受伤,以免激怒对方。 甚至在海外训练营期间,教练还曾开车到一个僻静的地方,将她拖出去殴打,因为当时训练时表现糟糕,以此作为惩罚。 加入资深级别比赛后,身心虐待却不曾停止 一切暴力行为直到他加入资深级别的比赛时,惩罚虽然有稍微缓和,但身体和精神上的虐待却不曾停止。 除了她自己以外,她也揭露体育界尤其是滑冰或体操选手,经常因此而患上进食障碍如神经性暴食症(Bullimia)或厌食症(anorexia)。因为教练严格控制体重,选手们担心体重过重而继续造教练的虐打,因此受开始出现进食障碍。 她也透露自己为此出现暴食的症状,因为想节食却反而出现无法控制的暴饮暴食症状,又因暴食症而陷入深深的罪恶感,而这些精神伤害一直延续至今才开始的得以疗愈。…

68 illegal dorms “discovered” in Geylang – only tip of the iceberg?

In the last four months, a shocking 68 unauthorised dormitories for workers…

Company that makes M&Ms to eliminate palm-oil suppliers that contributes to deforestation

Chocolatier Mars Wrigley, the company that makes M&Ms and Snickers, had announced…

ST quoting Edelman’s survey: 67 per cent of Singaporeans trust the Government

Quoting the 2019 Edelman Trust Barometer survey, local media, the Straits Times…