~by: Cheong Yaoming

UPDATE: The following is a response from Ministry of Manpower on this case:

The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) was alerted by the Police this morning of an incident involving around 200 work permit holders employed by Sunway Concrete Products (S) Pte Ltd and Techcom Construction & Trading Pte Ltd over unpaid salaries since November 2011.

MOM’s officers responded to the incident immediately and went down to the worksite at Tampines Industrial Street 62.

MOM’s interim investigations revealed that the employers had not paid their workers since November 2011. MOM understands that by 8pm today (6 February 2012), the employers would have paid out the November 2011 salaries to all the affected workers, with MOM officers present on-site.

The employers have also assured MOM that the affected workers will receive their outstanding December 2011 salaries by this Friday (10 February). MOM will continue investigations here and follow up with the workers to ensure that they receive their December 2011 and January 2012 salaries promptly. MOM officers will also interview workers on other employment-related issues.

MOM does not condone employers who fail to pay salaries on time, or fail to upkeep and maintain the foreign workers they have brought in. MOM urges workers to report to MOM early if they have salary arrears.

Over a hundred mostly Bangladeshi workers went on strike today at a construction site in Tampines Industrial Street 62, over a dispute of unpaid salaries. Sunway Concrete Products (S) Pte Ltd are the main contractors, and Techcom Construction & Trading Pte Ltd is the sub-contractor of the construction site for HDB flats. 

At 8am, instead of starting work, the workers went on strike because they have not been paid since October 2011.  TOC understands that several pleas to the main and sub contractors to settle the unpaid salaries went unheard.

The workers complained that there were deductions of $150 per month for food and $20 for utilities.  Further to these, $1500 was also deducted from workers who requested that their work permits be renewed. 

The workers on strike complained that they were paid only $18 per day and had to work till 1am, with no overtime pay. Despite the monthly $150 deduction per worker for food, the quality of food was uneatable. The workers had to pay for the food even if they refused the meals served. 

When TOC visited the site, the police had cordoned it off and we were not allowed to talk to the workers on strike.

TOC understands that the workers will be paid their salaries due in November by today; and that by Friday, the contractors have agreed to pay the salaries for December.


Article updated on 6 February 2012 at 8.30pm.

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Homeowner of new BTO who found wall covered with mould is now slammed with S$600 water bill despite moving out

Just over a month ago, on 30 March, Facebook user named Newme…

Singapore joins the Danone Nations Cup

PRESS RELEASE For the first time ever, Singapore will be participating in…

新加坡能复制大马变天?(3) “自由主义专制国” 覃炳鑫:行动党营造恐惧层层操控

历史学者覃炳鑫认为,新加坡当权政府人民行动党对国家公器的使用和社会结构操控,都有别于马来西亚。他从历史进展过程和体制角度,分析新马两国的不同之处,阐述新加坡当权者,拥有极度倾斜的选举游戏规则、高度集中的权利,还有近乎包山包海的社会文化控制,成为新加坡变天的层层阻碍。 从社会经济层面,国阵并没有如人民行动党一般,集中式地垄断政权。“1955年选举,国阵横扫51席。不过在一些地方议会却败给反对党(而后国阵索性取消掉地方议会选举,直到今天仍未回复)。在此后选举,也无法掌控一些州属政权,如吉兰丹和登嘉楼。” “1969年,513事件爆发,当时国阵宣布进入紧急状态、悬空国会,推出新经济政策、国家五大原则等有利国阵政权的政策。在1974年,说服民政党和伊斯兰党加入国阵。” 覃炳鑫是在本月18日,出席在邻国柔佛举行的“新加坡能复制大马变天?”时事论坛上,列出处以上历史事实,让出席者了解马新两国、国阵和人民行动党之间的差异,从而得知两国面对的不同处境。 他说明,国阵从未如行动党般,享有过绝对论断的政权,马国幅员较广、社群多元,政治体制分为多层次。 相对下,人民行动党在1959年取得政权后,马上废除地方议会、市镇会选举,权力集中,取消各独立组织,或以新组织取而代之,例如直接由总理管辖的人民协会。 再者,破坏新闻独立,把所有媒体由国家掌控。至于可能成为异议分子温床的律师公会、宗教团体、工会和独中等,不是被收编就是被废除。 https://youtu.be/jng2bchnu-U 一个“自由主义专制国” 他引述《悉尼先驱晨报》对人民行动党的描述: 透过司法、控制媒体、以及恶法打压异议份子,藉此牢牢掌控政权。新加坡属自由民主(liberal democracy)政体,但是有形无实,使他成为一个“自由主义专制国家”(liberal…

Bus catches fire at junction of Portsdown Road and one-north Gateway

A bus caught fire at the junction of Portsdown Road and one-north…