the following is a public statement by Mr Chiam See Tong:

Some of the claims made in public against members in the SPP and myself have become so warped that I am now compelled to give a personal explanation.

The six members of the CEC submitted their resignations to the party on 27 January, asking for that to take place with immediate effect. While we were reluctant, I eventually accepted their resignations in writing as they had made the resignations public.

The party can confirm that we have received legal advice to refute claims that the conduct of the Ordinary Party Conference (OPC) elections for new CEC members on 29 January was unconstitutional. Those claims were made by the ex-members who were not present at the OPC, and thus may not have been aware of the proceedings that day.

It has been levelled against me as Secretary-General of the SPP that I am not interested in leadership renewal and succession, or in being consultative. Nothing can be further from the truth.

I am aggressively building up the next batch of potential leaders, consistent with the public statement the party made recently. At this point of time, we can confirm that our talent pipeline is not affected. But the baton should only be passed when the right leaders are in place. To be sure of the capability and aptitude of the next leader, they have to work with our grassroots and volunteers. They have to show commitment to attending our walkabouts and other party activities. They have to showcase their policymaking capabilities through the policy working group. 

I believe in the merits of a consultative, collective leadership. But the situation of a ‘lack of collective leadership’ which the party has been accused of was in fact a situation of ‘collective leadership’ exercised by those ex-CEC members in isolation from other CEC members. A key example of this was the setting up of their proposed community foundation under the banner of the SPP, which was privy only to them. The rest of the CEC was not consulted or involved in this setting up of this foundation.    

We have been asked to respond to specific accusations over disagreements concerning signboards, book publications and event invitations. We see no point in doing so. 

We reiterate that contrary to rumours, former presidential candidate Mr Tan Jee Say was not involved in the resignations. If he decides to join the SPP, we will welcome him fully.

The SPP is supportive of opposition unity and initiatives towards this end.

We have no ill intentions towards the ex-CEC members. They have indicated their intention to pursue other interests – we respect their decision and we sincerely wish them all the best in their future endeavours.

Chiam See Tong

Secretary-General

SPP


the following is a statement by Singapore People's Party:

On 29 January 2012, the SPP conducted an Ordinary Party Conference (OPC) and elected a new Central Executive Committee (CEC). The appointments within this new CEC have not yet been decided – this will be subjected to a vote within 3 weeks of the OPC, and will be announced in due course.

The party received both resignations, which had been accepted, as well as new applications for membership. This was an opportune time for the party to renew and strengthen the team.

The events within the SPP over the past week were an internal matter, and the party saw no need to speak to the media about it. However, some claims leveled at members in the party in public are untrue and we want to make certain clarifications. 

It was reported in several sources in the print and online media reported that the resignation of the CEC members was linked to former presidential candidate Mr Tan Jee Say. That rumour went that the possibility of Mr Tan joining the SPP was met with resistance from within the party. This is not true. If Mr Tan decides to join the SPP, we will fully welcome him.  The SPP is also supportive of opposition unity and initiatives towards this end.

We have 3 main points of focus now:  

Internally we are focused on building a sustainable pipeline of talents. The party takes the leadership pipeline seriously. This includes taking a very careful stance in planning for succession. To be accountable to Singaporeans whom we serve, the SPP has to be sure of the capability and aptitude of the next leader, whether he or she can work well with all the bases of the party including our strong grassroots and volunteers bases, and must be proven over time. This guiding principle applies to our decision in the OPC. The leadership in SPP has been carefully building up the character of select young candidates with the passion to serve through different platforms such as the policy working group and the weekly MPS. These potential leaders will be given the chance to drive key projects within the SPP for the good of Singaporeans. This select group receives personal mentorship from senior members of the SPP directly.

A second focus is the continuity of our work. Besides the policy work group, the party’s other activities continue as usual. These include its financial counselling sessions led by volunteer Mr Leong Sze Hian, at Potong Pasir Block 108; its weekly Meet the People sessions (MPS), conducted by NCMP Mrs Lina Chiam at Block 213 Lorong 8 Toa Payoh; and the party's regular walkabouts of outreach and door-to-door MPS at Bishan-Toa Payoh. Currently the team is working on inputs from the public for the upcoming parliamentary debate on the 2012 Singapore Budget. Our 3 priorities for policy work comprises of social and healthcare, CPF and economic growth.

Thirdly, the party sees Potong Pasir, Bishan-Toa Payoh and Hong Kah North constituencies as its priorities at the next general election due in 2016.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Social worker saves domestic worker from being sent back her country under dubious circumstances

Jolovan Wham, a Social Worker at Humanitarian Organization for Migration Economics (HOME)…

Thai opposition figure vows to fight on despite royal defamation case

A billionaire Thai opposition figure accused of defaming the country’s monarchy has…

何晶转载文章“为何总理薪资那么高” 为夫君高薪说理

还记得荣誉国务资政吴作栋,在去年引起网民怒火的“部长高薪论”吗?吴作栋当时捍卫“高薪养廉”,也批评要部长减薪的建议乃民粹主义做法,引起网民热议。 时隔一年,总理夫人何晶,在个人脸书分享一则文章,题为《为何新加坡总理的薪资那么高?》,并且发表个人观点,似乎也有意为夫君的高薪说理。 她开头先言“对于谁值得拥有什么”没有意见,但对于他所分享的文章表达看法,指出在新加坡“裸薪”政策下最大的区别是,为官期间除了薪资外不会再享有任何其他额外待遇,即便离职后也不会有任何退休金和其他福利。 她续指,即使不是全部,大部分其他国家的领导在位时,都能享有许多待遇,例如可以有管家、理发师、乘坐免费航班,甚至家庭假期;而如美国等国的领袖,即便退位后都还享有其他待遇。 她在贴文中说道:“不论是对公共服务,还是在协助贫穷、弱势群体的社会服务领域,我们都需要的确有热诚、肯付出之人,且拥有相符的能力和知识,且拥有智慧和理解长远影响和可持续性的体制。” “不应占便宜”给不足薪资 她需称,如果这些能人都拥有这些卓越的素质,更不应该“占他们便宜”给他们过低的薪资,或者强要他们戴上圣人的高帽”。 然而,当她提及在其他国家,从政者即便退休后都有额外待遇,但不禁令我们想起,包括前总理公署部长林文兴2011年在离开政坛后,隔年就加入淡马锡基金;前副总理兼内政部长黄根成也受聘为淡马锡旗下子公司星桥腾飞董事长,尚有其他例子,不胜枚举。 至于有关探讨为何总理李显龙薪资为何全球居首的文章,作者声称“没有任何政治背景”,仅是透过研究分析,摆事实讲道理,来厘清网络上对总理薪资的各种流言。 文章内容不外乎对比包括中、美、英和邻国马来西亚领导人的薪资,并提出尽管总理的年薪(220万新元),几乎是香港特首林郑月娥的两倍(约86万6千新元),但文章也指出,许多私人企业的总裁,例如星展银行总裁高博德(Piyush Gupta)的薪资,在2018年入账约1千190万新元。 文章又继续阐述,试图透过说明国内生产总值(GDP)自独立以来节节上升,以该表现来合理化本地领导人的高薪。文内举例,美国在2017年的人均GDP达到8万0662元,而新加坡是7万8161元,顺序排在后面的是香港、英国、马来西亚和中国。…