The friends of Yong Vui Kong celebrated his 24th birthday at the Speakers’ Corner today. TOC wishes Vui Kong happy birthday as well and request Singapore’s Cabinet to consider granting him his one birthday wish – a second chance at life. The following is a poem by Howard Lee. Howard says that he sends a birthday wish of peace to Yong Vui Kong, “but this is written for the Singapore Cabinet, on which rests the future of this young man.”

The dawn of a new day clears the mist.
We go about our daily dues.
Do what you can, take a few good risks,
For tomorrow again, we try anew.

But for some, each day is barely done
For repenting, reflecting and making amends.
Inner peace matters when dusk comes,
If you know the day and hour it ends.

All have one life, yet some have more breaths.
What would you do, if there is no logic in death?

Life’s complex, we say, too many villains.
An assault on values is our greatest fear.
Too much at stake if we ponder variants.
A show of strength is not to waiver.

But what of the heart that beats true
To a cause or need we’ve never witnessed?
Vexed answers we seek from simple rules.
Our fixed mindset, to praise or curse?

When we are done judging by virtue of maths,
We might realise, alas, there is no logic in death.

Do our people want blood on their hands?
Is there order found at a noose end?
Are a hundred maybes worth the life of a man?
Do we even know what we defend?

The legals have decided the penalty to be.
That course has run, now is your turn.
The difference between a trial and clemency
Is the compassion you can give in return.

If we but recognise the role we play best,
Then we’ll see there is no logic in death.

Do we give thought to remorse and sadness,
While for happiness we strive?
Or are we caught up in the busy-ness
That rules the seconds of our lives?

Were there times you wished to be forgiven,
By God, by man, by those you offend?
Will you reach out and touch a face so foreign,
And realise you, too, have made amends?

If we all had to take the same last test,
Might we believe there is no logic in death?


picture credit: Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss’ Facebook

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Expat’s wife complains to Mothership about S’porean who verbally abused her family at Pasir Ris

Local media publication, Mothership.sg, published an article yesterday (10 May) revealing that…

三官委议员坚持立场力争修《防假消息法》遭否决

5月8日,《防止网络假信息和网络操纵法案》在国会经过两天、超过13小时的马拉松辩论,最终以72赞成票、九张反对票、三张弃权票,三读通过。共有七名部长和次长、31名议员参与相关辩论,其中三名官委议员:王丽婷、特斯拉和郭秀钦,争取通过他们的修法建议但遭否决,在三读时投弃权票。 在辩论进行时,王丽婷数度提出《防假信息法》的修改建议,包括了要求部长们保证能够更加严格看待修正建议、将部长和政府的权限写入法案主体中、要求设立独立的理事会监督执法、还有上诉程序中的缺陷等等。 他们也呼吁政府修改法案中,对“事实”和“不真实信息”的定义,因为目前的定义仍然太过宽泛和主观。 在针对上诉程序中,三人建议在法案中加入一个阐明更多立法原则的条文,并且建议上诉程序必须迅速且成本低。惟,但是尚穆根对此建议表示不认同,他认为三人提出的原则过于宽泛,与之相比,政府反而给出了更具体的时间表。 三人多数建议中,有些在第二次辩论中就已经不被采纳,因此他们决定弃权。 特斯拉更是数度要求国会秘书将有关的弃权票数记录在案。 间中,工人党党魁毕丹星也曾经一度站起来发言,表示对于他们之前不被采纳的建议,每一条都投弃权票。(工人党立场是反对《防假消息法》) 工人党议员之前曾表示,法案将导致寒蝉效应,严重影响人们言论自由。 网民评论有褒有贬 三名官委议员的表现,在《网络公民》脸书专页上载后,网民反应有褒有贬。有人按赞,为三人的表现鼓掌,有人感到无奈,也有人觉得力量不足。 有网民对他们的表现感到敬佩,甚至称赞他们为勇敢的火枪手(brave musketeers)。…

民众奉献、鼓励是“无可估量的礼物” 林志蔚满怀感恩

盛港集选区议员林志蔚于昨日(13日)分享自己从居民手中接过的礼物并表示感谢。 林志蔚透露,他们在和居民交流时偶尔会受到一些实体赠品,大多是书籍、钥匙圈、饼干、蛋糕和口罩。 他也解释,“身为议员,我们都要为这些进行申报,如果我们要保留一些赠品,都要自掏腰包付费(防止赠品成为影响政策抉择的因素)。” 除了收到居民的实体赠品以外,也有居民和支持者担任志愿者,奉献精力和时间,或为新加坡制定更好政策给予反馈和鼓励,林志蔚亦在文内对他们表达感谢。 “但除此之外,我们也从居民和支持者那里得到了无形的礼物,亦有同样的价值,他们选择作为志愿者牺牲时间和精力,或是对我们如何制定更好的政策给予反馈和鼓励。” 林志蔚也分享上周末在走访社区时,收到两张小便条,不同于以往,这些便条不是为林志蔚而写,而是向林志蔚的家人表达感谢,感谢他们愿意支持和牺牲,让林志蔚为国服务。 “这些礼物的价值是无法估量的”,林志蔚感谢说道,无论是何种形式的礼物,他们都将以感激之情接受。 <iframe src=”https://web.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fweb.facebook.com%2Fjamusjlim%2Fphotos%2Fa.114054826894198%2F164917518474595%2F%3Ftype%3D3&width=500″ width=”500″ height=”735″ style=”border:none;overflow:hidden”…