~by: Ravi Philemon~

A well-wisher of TOC wrote in to us on 25 January that he "had heard from reliable sources a long while ago (early 2011 or even in 2010) that top CID guys are under investigation by CPIB", and that it was around this time that Ng Boon Gay was shifted to CNB.

The New Paper confirms today that former Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB) Director Ng Boon Gay was investigated by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) in 2010, in relation to allegations of improper conduct of share dealings based on insider information.

"CPIB investigations concluded there was insufficient evidence that Ng had committed offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Subsequent Police investigation also found no evidence of insider trading or that he had benefitted from any insider information", a spokesman for Ministry of Home Affairs reportedly told that newspaper. 

"The Singapore Police Force (SPF) assessed that even though Ng did not break any laws, he should have been more circumspect in his dealings with acquaintances so as to avoid any perception of partiality", the MHA spokesperson added. 

Mr Ng was then counselled and issued with a Letter of Warning on 20 December 2010, but SPF assessed that he could continue with the Force. He was posted to head CNB in January 2011. 

The spokesperson for MHA told the newspaper that his Letter of Warning was taken into consideration when posting him to head CNB, but that Mr Ng had performed well throughout his career in senior positions within the SPF, and that it 'was assessed that while this (warning letter) was a spot on his record, no criminal wrongdoings had been found, and his conduct did not render him unsuitable for the post". 

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Singapore citizens increasingly seek to assert rights online: HRW

Singapore’s government further restricted freedom of expression and assembly in 2014, and…

【冠状病毒19】自阻断措施以来 肉贩多次没戴好口罩接警告信

盛港巴刹及美食广场(Kopitiam Square)一肉贩在工作时,没有将口罩戴好,接获该广场当局所发出的警告信。 据《Stomp》报导,除了肉贩,该摊位的工作人员也接到了警告信。 据网民T分享的照片中,只见该肉贩直降口罩遮住下巴,且并非一、两次违规没戴好。 T指出,该肉贩除了戴好口罩,在处理食品时,也不戴手套。 “无论我几时到该广场,都会看到他没戴好口罩。当他和别人交谈时,口罩总是在下巴部位。” “这情况已经发生数个月了,自6月的阻断措施开始,我就看到是这样了。” 肉摊的其他工作人员都有正确戴好口罩。 受询问时,广场发言人感谢网民的反馈,并表示已经完成相关的调查。“相关人员已接获口头警告,而摊位职员和持牌人都接到了警告信。” 当局表示,除了加强监督,当局也向所有的摊位租户发出卫生提醒函,促请大家严格遵守所有的安全管理措施。 “我们很抱歉对民众带来不便。请放心,我们认真看待任何不遵守安全管理措施的情况,并且会立即采取对付行动。” 新加坡食品局也指出,目前餐饮场所营业者必须执行安全管理措施,并准守冠状病毒19临时措施法令。“这包括强制要求每个出门在外的民众都必须带上口罩,遮住鼻子和嘴巴,除了用餐和饮水的时候。”…

Charging for tap water – is it justifiable?

G Hui Singapore is an island surrounded by water. Rainfall is plentiful…

何晶:不应下定论群聚拥挤 造成客工宿舍疫情扩散

总理夫人何晶又发表“伟论”!她在周六(5月30日)发文,指出我们不应武断地定论,客工宿舍“群聚、拥挤”的情况,就是造成客工宿舍疫情爆发的主因之一。 何晶也是淡马锡首席执行长。淡马锡控股在疫情爆发后,也与盛裕控股集团寻找并确认博览中心,设立为社区护理设施。 何晶在贴文中解释,例如豪华游轮即便乘客都有独立的客房,但还是造成了疫情爆发;疗养院也不拥挤,监狱同样把囚犯区隔开来,但这些地方都出现了疫情。 社区护理设施(CCF)分为红黄绿区。一些隔离设施的“黄区”仍转变为感染群。她指出,在经过调查后,当局发现这可能是因为他们习惯把食物集中在一起,集体进食的社交习惯。 何晶提及分享食物的社交习惯存在于不同文化,也指她也认为防疫应着重在防止飞沫传播。 故此,她认为在大家反对拥挤客工宿舍、在仓促落实应对疫情的改变前,应先理解病毒的传播途径,以及人们社交习惯的本能。 “听起来像精英口气?” 不过,也有网民留言对何晶这番言论嗤之以鼻,“听起来像精英居高临下的口气,客工群体对我国经济社会作出重大贡献,这种论述似乎严重缺乏同情心。” 网民认为,即便客工的习俗可能造成疫情传播,但暗示这就是主要原因是谬误的,也缺乏基于事实的证明,反而促成分化我者与他者(因文化等)的区别。 杨莉明曾指工地共用工具也可能是传播途径 事实上,人力部长杨莉明在4月25日接受《联合早报》直播访谈, 曾提及专家研究也得知客工之间感染不仅是宿舍问题,他们也有共同工作场所如建筑工地等,而工地中工友间共用工具也可能是传染渠道之一。