the following is a brief report of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’a speech in Parliament today on Ministerial salaries:

Speaking in Parliament today, PM Lee said that the issue is not just whether salary is “correct” or “incorrect”, but if the basis is proper and legitimate.  He said that the key is to find right balance between idealism and pragmatism; and to find a formula that is acceptable to citizens and one that will work well.
He also said that the Ministerial salary issue should not be just about the amount of money, but also about Singapore’s future; to ensure that Singapore always has a good government.  In selecting a team of MPs and ministers, the overriding priority is to build the best team for Singapore.
PM Lee also stated that many good officers, now in the civil service, would have been lost to the private sector, if the civil service did not pay well. If one chooses to become an MP, the PM reminded, there is no certainty of success, you may lose your job-specific skills and there is also no turning back.
If money had been a consideration they would not even have been fielded as MPs, said the PM, let alone be brought into the government.
The MPs have come in to serve Singapore and for them salaries are not a make or break issue. Although some did decline to be MPs but not because of pay.
Heng Swee Keat, a former top civil servant for example declined (due to children) when first approached.  But he agreed subsequently taking a substantial pay cut.
PM Lee said that he had grappled with the salary issue his entire career, from SAF in the 80s to adjusting civil service pay, when it lagged behind the private sector.  He agreed that ministerial pay remains an issue with Singaporeans who feel that Ministers’ salary were too high and that it should not pegged to private sector or that ministers are deciding their own pay.
The concerns of Singaporeans are reasonable said the PM. No government can function without the interests of people at heart, he acknowledged. He said that this issue cannot be resolved in the heat of election.
PM Lee reiterated that salary is critical but what’s more worrisome is the ability to assemble the best team to serve Singapore, which remains a constant worry for him. The government needs people of different backgrounds and aspirations, but cannot afford to have our entire system based on this, he said. He also emphasised that bigger monetary sacrifice won’t deter more public-spirited Singaporeans from coming forward to serve and that there have been Singaporeans who have come forward.
He reminded that there is a need to be pragmatic. Overall this approach has worked for Singapore and today we have a strong committed team, he said.  It may not be perfect, but it works.
PM Lee emphasised that we are a little red dot and that our survival and success will always be based on our ability to be extra-ordinary.  And he also stated that there is no one to bail us out.
Touching on the suggestion to follow other countries in the Ministerial salaries issue, PM Lee said that we need to be realistic. Others have their own problems and are not in same situation as Singapore, he said.
Some foreign leaders have also privately expressed to him that they wished to follow Singapore’s model on salaries, but cannot because of politics, and that they are impressed with Singapore’s Ministers. PM Lee said that a good government will remain critical to Singapore which will face different challenges and that it cannot work on auto-pilot.
He said that a country cannot be run by technocrats and that Singapore politics is changing and so it will be more difficult to find potential Ministers.  And if ministerial salaries are uncompetitive, it will just add another obstacle to people who have something to contribute to Singapore.
The ‘Pink’ identity card is a Singapore dividend said PM Lee, as many have high regard for Singapore and Singaporeans.  If people stop having high regard for us, we will be in trouble, he reminded.
PM Lee said that ultimately his responsibility is to ensure that individually each minister is performing up to expectations and that Cabinet delivers the best Government.  Ministers must be held accountable no matter what they are paid.  A good minister does not do what the PM tells him to do but is entrepreneurial, he said.
A minister’s responsibility cannot be a formula, PM Lee emphasised, because not every Minister is equal. Some are different in judgement and ability, he admitted. But they are all in one team, the PM stressed.
In conclusion, PM Lee said that he does not expect his speech to be the last word on the issue of Ministerial salaries, but that he needs the right system to help the next team to succeed.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Criticisms posted on Balakrishnan’s Facebook page deleted

Comments by members of the public criticising Vivian Balakrishnan on his Facebook…

若2030年人口少过690万 为何仍执迷开发树林建组屋?

回溯去年大选,人民行动党政府驳斥民主党,强调政府没有所谓“一千万人口”的规划目标;去年10月,总理公署部长英兰妮也在国会宣称,政府在2018年曾预测,截至2030年,新加坡的总人口数可能会低于690万人。 英兰妮当时也表示,2019年新加坡民生育率达到1.14,与2018年相同。 武吉巴督山坡树林保育发起人Jimmy Tan,对此不禁困惑,假设直到2030年,新加坡总人口可能大大低于690万人,为何政府仍执迷大事开发树林,建造更多组屋住房呢? Jimmy Tan今日(12日)在脸书上持续公开为武吉巴督山坡丛林发声,重申武吉巴督山坡丛林的重要性,以及质问砍伐树林建造住房的目的。 他表示,自去年8月发动联署开始,已获得近1万支持,除了武吉巴督的居民外,其实乌鲁班丹、榜鹅、白沙林一带的居民,也面对附近树林或自然生态栖息地逐渐减少的隐忧。 “这些居民之所以选择在当地定居,是因为可以和大自然亲近、空气清新,偶尔能够看见野生动物,以及享受宁静的片刻。当你看见如此幸福的保护区和自然栖息地,被他们以开发房产地的名义夺走,真的感到很悲伤。” 他续指,与其破坏成熟的次生林(secondary forest),不如将预购组屋(BTO)在一些开发建筑地,或棕地(废弃工业或商业用地)上建造会或许会更好。 另一方面,他也质疑尤其在生育率低的时代,为何仍需要不停建造组屋,甚至不惜破坏已不多的树林,就是为了建造更多住房空间。 “有报道指出,鉴于最近的趋势,截至2030年,我国的总人口可能大大低于690万,为何仍需破坏武吉巴督部分森林,以建造更多住房空间。”…

黄志豪:政府应明年7月起 调高退休和再雇佣年龄顶限

全国职工总会副秘书长黄志豪建议,政府应按原定计划,从2022年7月起,调高退休和再雇佣年龄顶限。 去年5月,政府为了减轻企业在疫情下负担,而宣布年长员工公积金缴交率的调高,从原定今年1月1日,延缓一年落实。 但职总却认为,应该按劳资政去年达成的共识,从明年1月起开始调高。 黄志豪称,考量到整体的劳动市场的反应以及政府提供的协助、以及当前疫苗计划已推行,“我们认为这是可以进行的,因为我们本就要为我们年长员工的退休储蓄铺路。” 他指截至去年6月,即便在疫情下本地年长员工就业率,仍增加近1个百分点,为此认为年长员工的就业率已趋向稳定。 他指出,目前更多企业意识到年长员工的重要。黄志豪也呼吁雇主,在转向数码化和灵活工作下,不忽略年长员工的机会和培训。 回溯2019年,总理在国庆群众大会演说,宣布政府将在2021年迈出第一步,在未来十年逐步把退休年龄和重新雇佣年龄,分别调高至65岁和70岁。