800px-Rochor_Centre_Jan_06

Debate concerning the clearance of Bukit Brown Cemetery to make way for a new four-lane dual carriageway and new housingdevelopments will likely be revived with the recently announced plans to evict and relocate residents of Rochor Centre to make way for the North-South Expressway. The central argument made by the authorities is that such changes are necessary for Singapore’sdevelopment. Change is inevitable – that has formed the core of Singapore’s development ethos for much of our history as an independent nation. But it is worth considering for a moment what exactly development stands for.

Development is almost always assumed to be positive and progressive. I will question that assumption further into this note, but will grant for now that development does indeed involve beneficial change. But it is important to also understand who benefits fromdevelopment

In the case of the Bukit Brown and Rochor developments, the extension of Singapore’s road network will undoubtedly benefit vehicle-owners by easing traffic congestion. Car-owners stand to benefit most, since cars account for the largest proportion of all vehicles. Car-owners can safely be assumed to be in the middle and upper strata of society, simply because of the economic demands associated with purchasing and owning a car.

Large swathes of what is now Bukit Brown Cemetery has also been slated for residential use. The question then is: for who? Singapore’s resident population is shrinking due to our low fertility rate, and the Government has promised to stabilize and control the foreign resident population. Production of Build-to-Order flats in existing residential estates has also been increased recently to meet the demands of first-time flat-buyers. If there is no need to house a growing population, one can assume that future residential projects in the Bukit Brown will cater to those looking to upgrade their homes, perhaps to a condominium or a DBSS flat. These again are likely to benefit those in the middle and upper strata of society.

The general understanding then is that the benefits of development in Bukit Brown and Rochor are most likely to accrue to Singaporeans that are financially better-off.

But what of the costs associated with development? The case for Bukit Brown has been made by heritage associations, historians, and concerned Singaporeans in general – the cemetery is one of the last remaining links to our past, and preserving it can enrich our understanding and appreciation of our culture and heritage. Development is multidimensional, and should be approached from perspectives beyond simple economics. The intangibles, culture in this case, are equally important for a holistic consideration of a country’s level of development. An economy that is not rooted in such intangibles is no different from a simple corporation – soulless, and without character.

The cost of the Rochor development, on the other hand, will be borne by over 700 residents and shop-owners of Rochor Centre who will be uprooted from where they have lived, many for decades, some since the building was constructed in 1977. Despite the offer of relocation and compensation, many of the affected are senior in age, and will find it challenging to have to adapt to new and alien living environments. The anxiety, stress, emotional trauma and sense of dislocation are important considerations that are often  not accounted for in the economic calculus of Singapore’s development narrative.   

To compound matters, it is likely that the residents of Rochor Centre are not likely to benefit much from the new North-South Expressway, despite bearing the brunt of the cost of development. As explained earlier, the benefits of the expressway are likely to accrue to Singaporeans that are financially better-off. My assumptions here are that most of those affected in Rochor do not drive, and are less well-off financially and thus not able to afford a car in the first place. Is it fair then that the interests of the more vulnerable among us be sacrificed for the benefit of those who are fortunate enough to be in the upper rungs of society?

There are also other costs associated with these upcoming projects in Bukit Brown and Rochor. Blogger Mr Brown stated in a recent post that such projects feed Singapore’s car culture. A burgeoning car culture will most certainly worsen air quality in Singapore, which in turn may increase healthcare costs with a higher incidence of respiratory diseases. Once again it is the lower-income groups that are least able to cope with an increased healthcare burden.

Development may not necessarily entail progress, especially when the purported benefits are not equitably distributed, and the costs disproportionately shouldered by the more vulnerable groups in society. Neither is development, in the typical bulldozing Singapore-style, necessarily inevitable. The authorities must seriously consider less disruptive alternatives to solve a stated problem. All this must start from us thinking beyond simple economic cost-benefit analyses when considering the impact of development. 

You May Also Like

吴家和号召募资为清寒子弟偿还欠费 成功筹得逾万元善款

社运分子吴家和发起群众筹资,成功筹集得逾一万元,帮助尚拖欠学费的清寒子弟偿还学费,让孩子们能够如同一般孩子领取自己的正本成绩单。 日前吴家和指有清寒子弟原本只能领取小六会考成绩单影本,引起了各界的关注。为了让孩子能够顺利获得正本成绩单,吴家和在Go Get Funding网站,发起“为小六会考、N水准、O水准学子偿还欠费募善款”。截至周四下午5点05分,已有147名人士支持募款活动,共筹得了1万零677元的资金。 除了中小学生的学费,吴家和也通过众筹协助无法缴纳学费的理工学院学生。 吴家和也呼吁民众一旦发现欠缴学费的学生,尽早通知他,好让他能够尽快审理并支付学费。 他强调,“任何未欠缴学费案例都有可能影响孩子领取正本成绩单的可能,不要让孩子因为无法领取证书而自尊受到影响。” 也协助N水准和理工学院学生还清欠费 吴家和昨日也在脸书上持续分享相关案例,一名N水准学生也是透过筹资的资金偿还了以往欠下的费用,共700元。其中500元是透过众筹资金所支付,而另有200元则是透过善心人士支付。 该名学生也因为偿还了之前的费用后,得以继续在工艺教育学院继续修读护理课程。 除了以上的受惠学生,吴家和也协助一名理工学院学生偿还学费。据悉,该名学生一学期费用需达995元。学生通过筹资支付了500元,其余的金额则由善心人士支付。 家长出意外,无法继续机场工作…

Prime Minister Lee discharged from SGH after successful operation

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong was discharged from Singapore General Hospital this…

时隔一月又沦陷! 双溪登加增57冠病病例

上月21日,当局宣布双溪登加客工宿舍(Sungei Tengah Lodge)是无冠病,孰不知一个月后竟再度“沦陷”,出现新感染群,共新增57冠病19病例! 双溪登加客工宿舍也是本地最大的客工专用宿舍,脱离感染群名单时,累计病例2203例。 根据卫生部文告,截至本月22日中午12时,本地新增50冠病19确诊,有两例社区病例,五例入境病例。 社区病例都是本地公民, ,两人分别是年龄56岁和63岁的新加坡籍女子,其中一人在出现症状后,还曾到宏茂桥的工艺教育中区学院工作。 入境病例方面,一名新加坡公民在本月10日从伊朗返国。另两人是29岁印度籍女子和44岁荷兰籍女子,持家属准证,在本月10日分别从印度和荷兰抵境。 还有一名学生证持有者,本月8日从印度抵境;以及一名40岁菲律宾籍工作准证持有者,本月9日从菲律宾抵新。他们都有遵守居家通知并接受检测。 目前,本地仍有1万3700名客工在隔离。 本地累计确诊增至5万6266例。当局仍在收集病例详情并将在今晚公布细节。  

An open letter to the Education Minister from a group of project work teachers

The following is a letter addressed to the Education Minister and it…