~by: Leong Sze Hian~

Image from ChannelNewsAsia.com

I refer to the articles “HDB resale prices up, private property prices moderate” (Asiaone, Oct 3) and  “First-time BTO applicants stand good chance” (Channel NewsAsia, Oct 3).

The Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) flash estimates released on 3 October, show that HDB resale and private residential property prices roses by 3.8 and 1.3 per cent, respectively, in the last quarter.

Demand from foreigners?

The prices of HDB flats are primarily driven by demand and supply.

On the demand side, the population increased from 5.08 to 5.18 million last year.

The number of foreigners and permanent residents (PRs) increased by 80,400 last year, compared to 59,100 the previous year. If most of the increase in foreigners is from higher income or more affluent foreigners, the demand pressures may mainly be on the private property market. However, if the bulk of foreigners are lower-income – they may have to rely on renting rooms or entire HDB flats, or buying resale flats if they qualify to buy as PRs.

When foreigners become PRs or citizens, they too may add to demand pressures in the HDB resale market.

Longer MOP?

Since the Minimum Occupation Period (MOP) for resale flats was changed from three to five years, the demand pressures on the resale market may increase, as it would take about nine years (four years to build plus five years MOP) for a Build-to-order (BTO) flat to be available in the resale market for sale or rental of the entire flat.

Who can’t buy BTO?

The following are not eligible to apply for BTO flats:-

  • PRs
  • Singaporeans who have owned their existing HDB flat for less than five years
  • private property and Executive Condo (EC) owners who have sold their property less than 30 months ago
  • those who have purchased two HDB or DBSS/EC flats with subsidies or grants
  • Singaporeans who cannot form a family nucleus, such as singles, divorcees, etc
  • Singaporeans who do not meet the various income ceilings – $10,000 maximum, $5,000 for 3-room, $2,000 for 2-room
  • Singaporeans who cannot afford to pay the resale levy of up to $55,000 on their previous flat
  • Divorcees who purchased a flat with subsidy or grant will have to wait for five years after their divorce is made absolute

In view of the above, many Singaporeans may not qualify for BTO flats. Moreover, since 95 per cent are reserved for first-timers, even those who qualify for BTO flats but as second-timers, may find it very difficult to get one.

So, where do all the above who can’t apply or can’t get BTO flats go to? – resale flats?

COV disappeared?

When the National Development Minister stopped disclosing the median Cash-over-valuation (COV) statistics the previous quarter, saying that it was misleading, it may have spooked the market into asking for even higher prices.

After all, isn’t it logical to expect this to be the natural reaction when statistics become so high (COV) that they can’t be disclosed anymore?


Support TOC! Buy Leong Sze Hian’s book here!

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Increase in maximum tenancy period for renting out of HDB flat to non-Malaysian non-citizen tenants

Flat owners applying to rent out their flat or bedroom(s) to non-Malaysian…

求爱失败 怒火中烧 嫉妒男杀女护士图奸尸

因爱而不得,男子嫉妒得杀死女护士,甚至尝试奸尸。 马来西亚籍的51岁男子,莫顺和今天在高庭中被揭发涉嫌于2016年3月21日中午12时15分至傍晚5时49分之间,在循环路某组屋单位内杀死一名女子,并企图奸尸,还取走了死者的现款和手机。 面对包括谋杀和企图性侵女尸等三项控状,被告表示不认罪,控方以谋杀罪状进行审讯。 控方在开庭陈词中指出,莫顺和在三年前跟踪他热烈追求一名28岁的女护士,并曾尝试和护士发生关系即亲吻,但在得知她和其他男人见面且态度亲热后,他妒忌地用浴巾将这名护士杀死了。 检察官指出,被告杀死护士后,为护士拍裸照,并试图和尸体发生关系,但因无法勃起而告吹。 被告随后逃到马来西亚,至2016年4月初才被马来西亚皇家警察逮捕,送回我国。 被告和小他19岁的中国籍死者,张花香是于2011年左右,在滨海湾金沙当餐厅职员时认识的。 死者没回应被告感情 副检察官Wong Kok Weng指出,被告一直将死者看做女友来对待,但是死者并没有回应对方的感情,也没有亲密往来。两人虽然有一起出门购物和用餐,但是死者在2016年3月初开始就拒绝和被告出门。 被告察觉死者试图和他保持距离,曾经四五次到死者住家对面的单位进行监视,并在2016年3月18日发现死者和一名男子乘出租车出门。…

Basis of conviction by judge in corruption offence debunks claim by AGC of having insufficient evidence to prosecute the six former Keppel executives

Teo Chu Ha, a Singaporean, was prosecuted and convicted for 12 charges…

工作睡着监禁三月?私人保安新条例对保安过于苛刻

翻译自资深保安领域从业人Loh Teck Yong文章(经编辑以便读者阅读): “今天,我在上班时不小心睡着了,结果警察来逮捕我。我将面对三个月的监禁。” 你以为以上的情景是开玩笑,但自今年1月1日起,我国私人保安业(行为)条例的行为准则,明确列出保安人员若在工作时出现打瞌睡、擅离职守、言辞侮辱等失职行为,可面对不超过两千元罚款或三个月监禁。 确实,专业的保安员不应出现上述疏失,即便直接开除用词侮辱和频频打瞌睡的保安员也不为过,但是要被罚款两千元甚至监禁三个月?这是在开玩笑吗? 不幸的是,我们的立法、执法机构从不幽默,上述的立法也不是开玩笑,但让我们看看保安员的真实处境: 保安员工作时间超长! 虽然有减少保安员加班、工时的建议,然而通常一名全职保安每周的工时仍长达72小时,几乎是每天12小时、每周工作六天。不如您来试试做一两个月,再来谈谈是否该严惩打瞌睡行为。当处在这种悲伤困境时,也许你能意识到保安要求人道点的待遇不算过分。 还有者每周工作96-120小时,连续数日都24小时不休工作,这种情况下,能不打瞌睡吗? 让保安连续不休工作肯定是违反的,但还是有不道德的保全机构还是要求保安这么做,一方要求,另一方愿挨,在完成12小时的轮值后,保安再继续加班,结果睡着了,他终归只是肉体凡胎,生理上该休息时就容易睡着,但就因为如此就严惩他们吗? 我在军中野外训练时不小心睡着,得到的惩罚也只不过是增加警备任务!…