~by: Howard Lee~

Ric O’Barry, marine mammal specialist and the man behind the Academy Award winning film, “The Cove”, is in Singapore for a dialogue session on 4 October to talk about his work to end dolphin exploitation. As part of his visit, he also attempted to open a dialogue with Resorts World Sentosa (RWS) on returning their captured dolphins, headed for RWS’s marine park attraction, to their original home in the Solomon Islands.

O’Barry, formerly a highly successful dolphin trainer for the “Flipper” television series, had his life-changing moment when one of the dolphins under his care died in his arms, whereupon he realised the error of attempting to confine and train dolphins. From then on, he has spent the last 40 years working to free dolphins around the world through his films and campaigns with local communities and authorities.

Barely hours of his landing in Singapore, I managed to call O’Barry for a tele-interview and got his views on his work, animal rights efforts in Singapore, and what ACRES has been doing.

_______

Film and the Internet figured heavily in your projects. What are the benefits of the media that makes you want to use it?

The Internet and Facebook has changed everything, as corporations can no longer lie and get away. They will be exposed. What we capture on film is clear evidence that the capture of dolphins for conservation and research purposes is a lie. And we were able to reach millions through social media and get their signatures of support. Organisations used to be able to get away with their lies before the age of Internet. Now, they are just shown to be inherently hypocritical.

I see a lot of perseverance and dedication in what you do. Do you think you are a dying breed in the world?

I don’ think so. “The Cove”, for instance, has created thousands of activists. If I used to feel alone, I don’t any more.

What have you heard of conservation and animal rights efforts in Singapore and what is your opinion of these efforts?

I only know of the one by ACRES to try and get the RWS dolphins back to the Solomon Islands. As part of our international campaign to save dolphins, they have my support and the support of millions. And I see that it is primarily a good thing for Singapore as a whole. If ACRES succeeds, it will be a positive windfall of publicity around the world for Singapore and for RWS, as people who care. Of course, the biggest winners will be the dolphins, as they get to return to their rightful home in the Solomon Islands.

What is your opinion on what RWS and the authorities have done so far?

I believe that RWS and the Singapore authorities can have an immeasurable impact on our youths by admitting they made a mistake and releasing the dolphins. RWS doesn’t need to have wild dolphins in their marine park, it is complete and perfect as an attraction by itself.

Looking at your projects around the world, you must have been branded a “foreign interference” many times. I can assure you that such sentiments will be prevalent in Singapore. How would you respond to this?

The 25 dolphins do not have Singapore passports. They belong in the Solomon Islands. The capture and traffic of dolphins is an international problem, and we all have an equal responsibility to do them right.

What has been the role of governments in your projects, particularly where they have been part of the negotiation process? What do you hope to see from Singapore’s government in the RWS dolphins case?

We are working with the Solomon Island authorities for a complete ban on the capture of wild dolphins. You, know, the Solomon Island people have been hunting dolphins for more than 450 years, and yet they can do this with us! Singapore has no reason to want the dolphins. I see my effort in the Solomon Island authorities as one of teach and learn – understand their position, but let them know that what they are doing is not sustainable. If the people of the Solomon Islands can stop, so can RWS and Singapore.

What will you say to the dolphin trainers and those tasked with working for RWS dolphin project? Bearing in mind that theirs is probably a job that puts food on the table.

They can be redeployed to train the dolphins, to help and prepare them for their return to the wild. It is a long term project that will take years, and there is no reason why they should not be able to do so.

Can we expect to see you here more often, helping ACRES campaign for RWS to let the dolphins go?

Yes. I fully support what ACRES is doing. If they need me, I will be here.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

DBS makes foray into chat commerce with “foodster” – Southeast Asia’s first bank-led retail chatbot

DBS announced the launch of Foodster – Southeast Asia’s first bank-led retail chatbot that…

Shouldn't the injured be transported to the nearest hospital by ambulances?

A tragic accident took place near Lucky Plaza whereby two people tragically…

First F-35 outside US crashed into the sea

Reuters reported today (10 Apr) that an F-35 stealth fighter belonging to…

“捍卫自由律师团”提告尚穆根 遭马国高庭撤销

马国高庭撤销当地人权律师组织“捍卫自由律师团”,对我国内政部长尚穆根提出的告诉。此前,尚穆根曾援引援引《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》(POFMA),下令更正有关“捍卫自由律师团”的一篇文章。 今年1月16日,“捍卫自由律师团”发表一则声明,指责樟宜监狱以残酷和不合法方式处决囚犯。 内政部驳斥相关内容,并强调政府不遗余力确保执法严格遵守法律程序,而执刑也都有监狱长或一名医生在场等。尚穆根更于22日援引 《防止网络假信息和网络操纵法令》,对该组织发出更正指令,并称文章内容不属实驳斥相关内容。 1月24日,“捍卫自由律师团”入禀法庭,要求马国法院裁决,尚穆根无法用防假消息法,对身在马国的“捍卫自由律师团”采取行动。该组织认为,此举如同把欺压性质的打假新闻法令,也对马国的言论伸出触角。 新加坡内政部今日(1日)也发布文告,该组织虽然提告尚穆根,但后续却未向他发出诉讼令状。反观该法庭文件也过期,而“捍卫自由律师团”也停止更新相关申请。有鉴于此,马国高庭上周一(21日)撤销了相关告诉。 文告指出,“捍卫自由律师团”曾指出将会提供证据证明,但却尚未有任何行动,基于该组织并未采取后续法律行动,因此足以证明目前所采取的法律行动是毫无根据的。